Magnetic recording write transducer having an improved sidewall angle profile

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/876,340, filed on Sep. 11, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C depict ABS, yoke and side views of a conventional magnetic recording head 10. The magnetic recording transducer 10 may be a perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) head. The conventional magnetic recording transducer 10 may be a part of a merged head including the write transducer 10 and a read transducer (not shown). Alternatively, the magnetic recording head may be a write head including only the write transducer 10. Although termed a yoke view, the view shown in FIG. 1B is taken along the surface parallel to the ABS a distance x1 from the ABS. This surface is depicted as a dotted line in FIG. 1C.

The main pole 20 resides on an underlayer 12 and includes sidewalls 22 and 24. The sidewalls 22 and 24 of the conventional main pole 20 form an angle α0 with the down track direction at the ABS and an angle α1 with the down track direction at the distance x1 from the ABS. As can be seen in FIGS. 1A and 1B, portions of the main pole 20 recessed from the ABS in the stripe height direction are wider in the cross track direction than at the ABS. In addition, the angle between the sidewalls 22 and 24 and the down track direction increases. Thus, α1 is greater than α0. For example, if α0 is on the order of 13°, then α1 may be 25°.

Although the conventional magnetic recording head 10 functions, there are drawbacks. In particular, the conventional magnetic recording head 10 may not perform sufficiently at higher recording densities. For example, the write field of the conventional main pole 20 may not have a sufficiently high magnitude write field to meet particular standards. Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method for improving the performance of a magnetic recording head.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A-1C depict ABS, yoke and side view of a conventional magnetic recording head.

FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a magnetic recording disk drive.

FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C depict ABS, yoke and side views of an exemplary embodiment of a magnetic recording transducer.

FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C depict ABS, yoke and side views of an exemplary embodiment of a magnetic recording transducer.

FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D and 5E depict ABS and various views and a side view of an exemplary embodiment of a magnetic recording transducer.

FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D and 6E depict ABS and various views and a side view of an exemplary embodiment of a magnetic recording transducer.

FIG. 7 depicts a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a method for providing magnetic recording transducer.

FIG. 8 depicts a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a method for fabricating a portion of a magnetic recording transducer.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 2 depicts a side view of an exemplary embodiment of a portion of a disk drive 100 including a write transducer 120. FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C depict ABS, yoke and side views of the transducer 120. For clarity, FIGS. 2, 3A, 3B and 3C are not to scale. For simplicity not all portions of the disk drive 100 and transducer 120 are shown. In addition, although the disk drive 100 and transducer 120 are depicted in the context of particular components other and/or different components may be used. For example, circuitry used to drive and control various portions of the disk drive 100 is not shown. For simplicity, only single components 102, 110, 120 and 130 are shown. However, multiples of each components 102, 110, 120 and/or and their sub-components, might be used. The disk drive 100 may be a PMR disk drive. However, in other embodiments, the disk drive 100 may be configured for other types of magnetic recording.

The disk drive 100 includes media 102, a slider 110 and a write transducer 120. Additional and/or different components may be included in the disk drive 100. Although not shown, the slider 110 and thus the transducer 120 are generally attached to a suspension (not shown).

The transducer 120 is fabricated on the slider 110 and includes an air-bearing surface (ABS) proximate to the media 102 during use. In general, the disk drive 100 includes a write transducer 120 and a read transducer (not shown). However, for clarity, only the write transducer 120 is shown. The transducer 120 includes a main pole 130 and coils 140. In other embodiments, different and/or additional components may be used in the write transducer 120.

The coil(s) 140 are used to energize the main pole 130. Two turns 140 are depicted in FIG. 2. Another number of turns may, however, be used. Note that only a portion of the coil(s) 140 is shown in FIG. 2. If, for example, the coil(s) 140 form a helical coil, then additional portion(s) of the coil(s) 140 may be located on the opposite side of the main pole 130 as is shown. If the coil(s) 140 is a spiral, or pancake, coil, then additional portions of the coil(s) 140 may be located further from the ABS. Further, additional coils may also be used.

The main pole 130 includes a pole tip region 132 close to the ABS and a yoke region 134 recessed from the ABS. The pole tip region 132 is shown as having top and bottom bevels 131 and 133, respectively, near the ABS. In addition, the pole tip region 134 includes sidewalls 136 and 138 in the cross track direction. The sidewalls are configured such that the pole 130 has a bottom and a top wider than the bottom.

The sidewalls 136 and 138 form sidewall angles with the down track direction. At the ABS, the sidewall 136 forms sidewall angle α0 with respect to the down track direction. In some embodiments, the sidewalls 136 and 138 are symmetric. Thus, although not labeled, the sidewall 138 would form substantially the same sidewall angle with the down track direction as the sidewall 136. In some embodiments, α0 is not more than fourteen degrees. In some such embodiments, α0 is at least twelve degrees. For example, α0 may be nominally 13.5°. At a distance x1 recessed from the ABS, the sidewall 136 forms sidewall angle α1 with the down track direction. The sidewall angle α1 is less than α0 at x1. For example, if α0 is 12-14 degrees, then α1 is greater than or equal to zero degrees and not more than 12-14 degrees. In some embodiments, α1 is at least seven degrees. Further, the distance x1 may vary. In some embodiments, x1 is desired to be not more than the distance which the bevel 131 or 133 extends into the ABS. For example, in some embodiments, x1 is not more than two hundred nanometers. In some embodiments, x1 is desired to be closer to the ABS. In some embodiments, x1 may be not more than eighty nanometers. For example, x1 may be at least 30 nm from the ABS if, for example, the processing tolerance in the location of x1 is 10 nm (corresponding to a 3σ of 30 nm). In general, x1 is desired to be sufficiently large that the sidewall angle α0 at the ABS remains unchanged. The manner in which the sidewall angle changes from α0 to α1 may vary. The sidewall angle may monotonically decrease between the ABS and x1. In some embodiments, the sidewall angle smoothly varies from α0 to α1. In other embodiments, the sidewall angle may change in step function(s) from α0 to α1. Although described herein as step function(s), one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that there are processing and/or other limitations or considerations. Therefore, the transitions of such a “step” function may be rounded and/or transitions may not be sharp. Thus, as used herein, a step function may not be identical to a purely mathematical step function. This may occur at x1 or between the ABS and x1. In other embodiments, the change may be linear or piece-wise linear. In other embodiments the change may be in accordance with a higher order function including but not limited to a quadratic function. However, other configurations are possible. Although described herein in terms of particular mathematical functions, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that there are processing and/or other limitations or considerations. Consequently, the actual profile of the main poles may not precisely follow the mathematical functions used herein.

The magnetic disk drive 100 may exhibit improved performance. Because of the variation in the sidewall angle, the magnetic field generated by the main pole 130 and used to write to the media 102 may be enhanced. The reverse overwrite gain may also be improved. The gradient in the magnetic field may also be improved while maintaining substantially the same side fields. As a result, adjacent track interference may not be adversely affected. Further, the pole tip region 132 of the main pole 130 may have an increased magnetic volume. Stated differently, the pole tip region 132 may include more magnetic material. As a result, the cross track magnetic anisotropy may be improved and domain lockup issues mitigated. Thus, performance of the disk drive 100 may be improved.

FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C depict ABS, yoke and side views of a transducer 120′ analogous to the transducer 120 in disk drive 100. For clarity, FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C are not to scale. For simplicity not all portions of the transducer 120′ are shown. Because the magnetic recording transducer 120′ is analogous to the transducer 120 in the magnetic disk drive 100, analogous components have similar labels.

The transducer 120′ includes a main pole 130′ having sidewalls 136′ and 138′ that are analogous to the main pole 130 and sidewalls 136 and 138, respectively. The main pole 130′ also includes a pole tip region 132′ and a yoke region 134′ that are analogous to the pole tip 132 and yoke 134, respectively. The pole tip region 132′ is shown as having top and bottom bevels 131 and 133, respectively that are analogous to the bevels 131 and 133 depicted in FIGS. 2 and 3C. The sidewalls 136′ and 138′ are configured such that the pole 130′ has a bottom and a top wider than the bottom.

The sidewalls 136′ and 138′ form sidewall angles α0′ and α1′ with respect to the down track direction at the ABS and x1′, respectively. In some embodiments, α0′ has a size range analogous to α0. For example, α0′ may be at least twelve degrees and not more than fourteen degrees and in some embodiments may be nominally 13.5°. The sidewall angle α1′ is less than α0′ at x1′. In the embodiment shown, α1′ is zero degrees. The distance x1′ may also vary in a manner analogous to x1. In some embodiments, x1′ is desired to be not more than the distance which the bevel 131 or 133 extends into the ABS. For example, in some embodiments, x1′ is not more than two hundred nanometers. In some embodiments, x1′ is desired to be closer to the ABS. In some embodiments, x1′ is not more than eighty nanometers. For example, x1′ may be at least 30 nm from the ABS if, for example, the processing tolerance in location of x1′ is 10 nm. In general, x1′ is desired to be sufficiently large that the sidewall angle α0′ at the ABS remains unchanged. The manner in which the sidewall angle changes from α0′ to α1′ may vary. The sidewall angle may monotonically decrease between the ABS and x1′. In some embodiments, the sidewall angle smoothly varies from α0′ to α1′. In other embodiments, the sidewall angle may change in step function(s) from α0′ to α1′. These change(s) may occur at x1′ or between the ABS and x1′. In other embodiments, the change may be linear or piece-wise linear. In other embodiments the change may be in accordance with a higher order function including but not limited to a quadratic function. However, other configurations are possible. Although the variation in sidewall angle is described herein in terms of step function(s) and other mathematical functions, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that there exist processing and/or other limitations or considerations. Therefore, the transitions of such a “step” function may be rounded and/or transitions may not be sharp. Similarly, “linear” regions may not be perfectly straight. Thus, the actual profile of the main poles may not precisely follow the mathematical functions used herein.

The magnetic transducer 120′ may exhibit improved performance for analogous reasons to those discussed above. Because of the variations in the sidewall angle, the magnetic field generated by the main pole 130′ may be increased. The reverse overwrite gain may also be improved. The gradient in the magnetic field may also be improved while maintaining substantially the same side fields. As a result, adjacent track interference may not be adversely affected. Further, the pole tip region 132′ of the main pole 130′ may have an increased magnetic volume. As a result, the cross track magnetic anisotropy may be improved and domain lockup issues mitigated. Thus, performance of the disk drive 100 may be improved.

FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5C and 5E depict ABS, first pole tip, second pole tip, yoke and side views, respectively, of a transducer 120″ analogous to the transducers 120/120′ and disk drive 100. For clarity, FIGS. 5A-5E are not to scale. For simplicity not all portions of the transducer 120″ are shown. Because the magnetic recording transducer 120″ is analogous to the transducers 120/120′ in the magnetic disk drive 100, analogous components have similar labels.

The transducer 120″ includes a main pole 130″ having sidewalls 136″ and 138″ that are analogous to the main pole 130/130′ and sidewalls 136/136′ and 138/138′, respectively. The main pole 130″ also includes a pole tip region 132″ and a yoke region 134″ that are analogous to the pole tip 132/132′ and yoke 134/134′, respectively. The pole tip region 132″ is shown as having top and bottom bevels 131 and 133, respectively, that are analogous to the bevels 131 and 133 depicted in FIGS. 2, 3C and 4C. The sidewalls 136″ and 138″ are configured such that the pole 130″ has a bottom and a top wider than the bottom.

The sidewalls 136″ and 138″ form sidewall angles α0″ and α1″ with respect to the down track direction at the ABS and x1″, respectively. In addition, the sidewalls 136″ and 138″ form sidewall angles α2 and α3 at positions x2 and x3. In the embodiment shown, α2 and α3 are between α0 and α1. Thus, the sidewall angle monotonically decreases from the ABS to x2, x3 and x1. In some embodiments, α0″ has a size range analogous to α0. For example, α0″ may be at least twelve degrees and not more than fourteen degrees and in some embodiments may be nominally 13.5°. The sidewall angle α1″ is less than α0″ at x1″. In the embodiment shown, α1″ is zero degrees. The distance x1″ may also vary in a manner analogous to x1/x1′. In some embodiments, x1″ is desired to be not more than the distance which the bevel 131 or 133 extends into the ABS. For example, in some embodiments, x1″ is not more than two hundred nanometers. In some embodiments, x1″ is desired to be closer to the ABS as described above. In general, x1″ is desired to be sufficiently large that the sidewall angle α0″ at the ABS remains unchanged. The manner in which the sidewall angle changes from α0″ to α1″ may vary. In some embodiments, the sidewall angle smoothly varies from α0′ to α1′. In other embodiments, the sidewall angle may change in a manner analogous to step function(s) from α0″ to α1″. These change(s) may occur at x2, x3 and x1″. For example, α2 may be 11° and x2 may be approximately 50 nm within tolerances. Similarly, α3 may be 7° and x3 may be one hundred nanometers within tolerances. However, in other embodiments, other distances and other sidewall angles may be possible. In other embodiments, the change may be linear or piece-wise linear. For example, a new slope for each line segment may occur at x2, x3 and x1. In other embodiments the change may be in accordance with a higher power function including but not limited to a quadratic function. However, other configurations are possible. Although the variation in sidewall angle is described herein in terms of step function(s) and other mathematical functions, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that there exist processing and/or other limitations or considerations. Therefore, the transitions of such a “step” function may be rounded and/or transitions may not be sharp. Similarly, “linear” regions may not be perfectly straight. Thus, the actual profile of the main poles may not precisely follow the mathematical functions used herein.

The magnetic transducer 120″ may exhibit improved performance for analogous reasons to those discussed above. Because of the variations in the sidewall angle, the magnetic field generated by the main pole 130″ may be increased. The reverse overwrite gain may also be improved. The gradient in the magnetic field may also be improved while maintaining substantially the same side fields. As a result, adjacent track interference may not be adversely affected. Further, the pole tip region 132″ of the main pole 130″ may have an increased magnetic volume. As a result, the cross track magnetic anisotropy may be improved and domain lockup issues mitigated. Thus, performance of the disk drive 100 may be improved.

FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D and 6E depict ABS, first pole tip, second pole tip, yoke and side views, respectively, of a transducer 120′″ analogous to the transducers 120/120′/120″ and disk drive 100. For clarity, FIGS. 6A-6E are not to scale. For simplicity not all portions of the transducer 120′″ are shown. Because the magnetic recording transducer 120′″ is analogous to the transducers 120/120′/120″ in the magnetic disk drive 100, analogous components have similar labels.

The transducer 120′″ includes a main pole 130′″ having sidewalls 136′″ and 138′″ that are analogous to the main pole 130/130′/130″ and sidewalls 136/136′/136″ and 138/138′/138″, respectively. The main pole 130′″ also includes a pole tip region 132′″ and a yoke region 134′″ that are analogous to the pole tip 132/132′/132″ and yoke 134/134′/134″, respectively. The pole tip region 132′″ is shown as having top and bottom bevels 131 and 133, respectively, that are analogous to the bevels 131 and 133 depicted in FIGS. 2, 3C, 4C and 5C. The sidewalls 136′″ and 138′″ are configured such that the pole 130′″ has a bottom and a top wider than the bottom.

The sidewalls 136′″ and 138′″ form sidewall angles α0′″ and α1′″ with respect to the down track direction at the ABS and x1′″, respectively. In addition, the sidewalls 136′″ and 138′″ form sidewall angles α2′ and α3′ at positions x2′ and x3′. In the embodiment shown, α2′ and α3′ are substantially equal to α0′″. Thus, the sidewall angle is substantially constant from the ABS to x2 and at least x3. In some embodiments, α0′″ has a size range analogous to α0. For example, α0′″ may be at least twelve degrees and not more than fourteen degrees and in some embodiments may be nominally 13.5°. The sidewall angle α1′″ is less than α0′″ at x1′″. In the embodiment shown, α1′″ is zero degrees. The distance x1′″ may vary in a manner analogous to x1/x1′/x1″. In some embodiments, x1′″ is desired to be not more than the distance which the bevel 131 or 133 extends into the ABS. For example, in some embodiments, x1′″ is not more than two hundred nanometers. In some embodiments, x1′″ is desired to be closer to the ABS as described above. In general, x1′″ is desired to be sufficiently large that the sidewall angle αO′″ at the ABS remains unchanged. The manner in which the sidewall angle changes from α0′″ to α1′″ may vary. In some embodiments, the sidewall angle may change in a step function from α0′″ to α1′″ at some location after x3′ and by x1′″. However, other configurations are possible. Although the variation in sidewall angle is described herein in terms of step function(s) and other mathematical functions, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that there exist processing and/or other limitations or considerations. Therefore, the transitions of such a “step” function may be rounded and/or transitions may not be sharp. Similarly, “linear” regions may not be perfectly straight. Thus, the actual profile of the main poles may not precisely follow the mathematical functions used herein.

The magnetic transducer 120′″ may exhibit improved performance for analogous reasons to those discussed above. Because of the variations in the sidewall angle, the magnetic field generated by the main pole 130′″ may be increased. The reverse overwrite gain may also be improved. The gradient in the magnetic field may also be improved while maintaining substantially the same side fields. As a result, adjacent track interference may not be adversely affected. Further, the pole tip region 132′″ of the main pole 130′″ may have an increased magnetic volume. As a result, the cross track magnetic anisotropy may be improved and domain lockup issues mitigated. Thus, performance of the disk drive 100 may be improved.

FIG. 7 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a method 300 for providing a magnetic recording transducer 120 having a main pole that may has a varying sidewall angle, such as main pole 130, 130′, 130″, and/or 130′″. For simplicity, some steps may be omitted, interleaved, and/or combined. The method 200 is also described in the context of providing a magnetic recording head 100 and transducer 120 depicted in FIGS. 2, 3A, 3B and 3C. However, the method 200 may be used to fabricate multiple magnetic recording heads at substantially the same time. The method 200 may also be used to fabricate other magnetic recording transducers including but not limited to any combination of 120, 120′, 120″, and/or 120′″. The method 200 is also described in the context of particular layers. A particular layer may include multiple materials and/or multiple sub-layers. The method 200 also may start after formation of other portions of the magnetic recording head. For example, the method 200 may start after a read transducer, return pole/shield and/or other structure have been fabricated.

Referring to FIGS. 2, 3A-3C and 7, the main pole 130 is provided, via step 202. Step 202 may include using one or more damascene processes. For example, a trench may be formed in a layer. The trench may be fabricated such that portions of the trench sidewalls form different angles with the down track direction. The material(s) for the pole 130 deposited, for example via plating. One or more ferromagnetic materials may be used. The pole tip 132 and yoke 134 may be formed. Other methods may also be used to form the pole 130 including but not limited to full film deposition of magnetic materials and removal for example via milling and/or lapping.

The coil(s) 140 are provided, via step 204. Portions of step 204 may thus be interleaved with the remaining steps of the method 200. For example, portions of the coil 140 may be provided before the formation of the main pole 130. However, other portions of the coil 140 may be provided after some or all of the main pole 130 has been formed. Step 204 may also include depositing and patterning the material(s) used for the coil(s) 140. Step 204 may include forming a single helical coil or one or more pancake/spiral coil. In such embodiments, a pancake coil 140 may include other turns far from the ABS.

Using the method 200, the magnetic disk drive 100 and magnetic transducers 120, 120′, 120″ and/or 120′″ may be provided. Thus, the benefits of the magnetic transducers 120, 120′, 120″ and/or 120′″ may be achieved.

FIG. 8 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a method 210 for providing a magnetic recording transducer 120 having a main pole that may has a varying sidewall angle, such as main pole 130, 130′, 130″, and/or 130′″. For simplicity, some steps may be omitted, interleaved, and/or combined. The method 210 is also described in the context of providing a magnetic recording head 100 and transducer 120 depicted in FIGS. 2, 3A, 3B and 3C. However, the method 210 may be used to fabricate multiple magnetic recording heads at substantially the same time. The method 210 may also be used to fabricate other magnetic recording transducers including but not limited to any combination of 120, 120′, 120″, and/or 120′″. The method 210 is also described in the context of particular layers. A particular layer may include multiple materials and/or multiple sub-layers. The method 210 also may start after formation of other portions of the magnetic recording head. For example, the method 210 may start after a read transducer, return pole/shield and/or other structure have been fabricated.

Referring to FIGS. 2, 3A-3C and 8, materials are provided in layers that are perpendicular to the ABS, via step 212. For example, one material may extend from the ABS to x1, while another extends from x1 to further from the ABS. In other embodiments, such as the transducer 120″, one material may extend from the ABS to x2, another from x2 to x3, a third from x3 to x1 and a fourth from x1 to further from the ABS.

A trench is etched for the pole, via step 204. Step 204 may include using one or more damascene processes. The different materials may have different etch characteristics. Consequently, each material may etch a different amount and provide a portion of the trench that has a different profile. Thus, the trench may have different sidewall angles at different distances from the ABS. The material(s) for the pole 130 deposited, via step 216. One or more ferromagnetic materials may be plated. The pole tip 132 and yoke 134 may be formed.

Using the method 210, the main pole 130/130′/130″/130′″, magnetic disk drive 100 and magnetic transducers 120, 120′, 120″ and/or 120′″ may be provided. Thus, the benefits of the magnetic transducers 120, 120′, 120″ and/or 120′″ may be achieved.