Patent application title:

Electrocatalytic devices using MOx/ICP composite thin films and methods of making the same

Publication number:

-

Publication date:
Application number:

18/203,384

Filed date:

2023-05-30

✅ Patent granted

Patent number:

US 12,531,169 B1

Grant date:

2026-01-20

PCT filing:

-

PCT publication:

-

Examiner:

Mark Kopec

Agent:

Daniel J. Jenkins

Adjusted expiration:

2044-02-03

Smart Summary: Electrocatalytic devices are designed to help speed up chemical reactions, specifically for reducing oxygen. They use special thin films made from a combination of materials called MOx and ICP. These films are created through a process called electrodeposition, which involves applying an electric current to form the films on a surface. The devices can improve efficiency in various applications, such as fuel cells. Overall, this technology aims to enhance energy conversion processes. 🚀 TL;DR

Abstract:

The present disclosure is directed to electrocatalytic devices having an electrodeposited MOx/ICP composite thin films for performing oxygen reduction reactions.

Inventors:

Assignee:

Applicant:

Interested in similar patents?

Get notified when new applications in this technology area are published.

Classification:

H01B1/124 »  CPC main

Conductors or conductive bodies characterised by the conductive materials; Selection of materials as conductors mainly consisting of other non-metallic substances organic substances Intrinsically conductive polymers

C01G45/02 »  CPC further

Compounds of manganese Oxides; Hydroxides

C08F134/04 »  CPC further

Homopolymers of cyclic compounds having no unsaturated aliphatic radicals in a side chain and having one or more carbon-to-carbon double bonds in a heterocyclic ring in a ring containing sulfur

H01B1/02 »  CPC further

Conductors or conductive bodies characterised by the conductive materials; Selection of materials as conductors mainly consisting of metals or alloys

H01M4/04 »  CPC further

Electrodes; Electrodes composed of, or comprising, active material Processes of manufacture in general

H01M4/50 »  CPC further

Electrodes; Electrodes composed of, or comprising, active material; Selection of substances as active materials, active masses, active liquids of inorganic oxides or hydroxides of manganese

H01M4/608 »  CPC further

Electrodes; Electrodes composed of, or comprising, active material; Selection of substances as active materials, active masses, active liquids of organic compounds; Polymers containing aromatic main chain polymers containing heterocyclic rings

H01M4/668 »  CPC further

Electrodes; Electrodes composed of, or comprising, active material; Carriers or collectors; Selection of materials Composites of electroconductive material and synthetic resins

H01M50/122 »  CPC further

Constructional details or processes of manufacture of the non-active parts of electrochemical cells other than fuel cells, e.g. hybrid cells; Primary casings, jackets or wrappings of a single cell or a single battery characterised by the material Composite material consisting of a mixture of organic and inorganic materials

C25B11/095 »  CPC further

Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material; Electrodes formed of electrocatalysts on a substrate or carrier characterised by the electrocatalyst material consisting of at least one catalytic element and at least one catalytic compound; consisting of two or more catalytic elements or catalytic compounds at least one of the compounds being organic

H01B1/00 IPC

Conductors or conductive bodies characterised by the conductive materials; Selection of materials as conductors

H01B1/12 IPC

Conductors or conductive bodies characterised by the conductive materials; Selection of materials as conductors mainly consisting of other non-metallic substances organic substances

H01M4/60 IPC

Electrodes; Electrodes composed of, or comprising, active material; Selection of substances as active materials, active masses, active liquids of organic compounds

H01M4/66 IPC

Electrodes; Electrodes composed of, or comprising, active material; Carriers or collectors Selection of materials

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/678,914, entitled “Electrocatalytic Devices Using MOx/ICP Composite Thin Films and Methods of Making the Same”, filed Aug. 16, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/377,282, entitled “Electrocatalytic Devices Using MOx/ICP Composite Thin Films and Methods of Making the Same”, filed Aug. 19, 2016, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

STATEMENT CONCERNING FEDERALLY-SPONSORED RESEARCH

The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. DE-AC04-94AL85000 between the United States Department of Energy and Sandia Corporation, and Contract No. DE-NA0003525 between the United State Department of Energy and National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, both for the operation of the Sandia National Laboratories.

FIELD

This invention relates generally to catalysis, and more particularly to electrocatalytic devices having cathodes including MOx/ICP composite thin films.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

As one of the key electrochemical reactions in energy storage and conversion applications, the efficiency of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is crucial to next-generation devices. High overpotentials are associated with the complex, four-electron transfer of the ORR, increasing operating potentials for devices like fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Commercially used electrocatalysts for the ORR, such as Pt and Pt/C, are expensive, rare, and not environmentally sustainable. Thus, there is motivation to design materials with the ability to catalyze the ORR that do not incur such high costs and sacrifice resources.

Metal oxides (MOx) have gained a certain prominence as non-precious metal electrocatalyst for the ORR with their ease and versatility of preparation, high activity, wide stability range, and environmental abundance. This includes, but is not limited to, perovskites, e.g., La0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3, spinels, e.g., NixCo3−xO4 and manganese-based oxides, e.g., MnO2 and Mn2O3. Manganese oxides (MnOx) have specific advantages in being extremely abundant and are naturally effective at decomposing peroxide, a possible intermediate/product of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Formally, the ORR can either proceed by a direct, four-electron reduction to hydroxide (Equation 1) or a two-electron reduction to peroxide (Equation 2), followed by either another two-electron reduction of the peroxide (Equation 3) or catalytic decomposition of the peroxide (Equation 4).
O2(g)+2H2O(l)+4e→4OH(aq)  (1)
O2(g)+H2O(l)+2e →HO2(aq)+OH(aq)  (2)
HO2(aq)+H2O(l)+2e→3OH(aq)  (3)
2HO2(aq)→2OH(aq)+O2(g)  (4)

Blending metal oxides (MOx), including MnOx, with carbon has been shown to greatly increase the preference of the four-electron mechanism due to improved conductivity and electron transport. The discovery and implementation of graphene in the past ten years has greatly expanded the possibilities of composite graphene/metal oxide catalysts because of its conductivity, structural variability (e.g. nanoribbons, fullerenes, sheets), effective dispersion of nanomaterials, and independent ORR activity. A class of materials that has been overlooked when considering the approaches to increasing conductivity is intrinsically conductive polymers (ICPs), despite the fact that conjugated polymers and polyheterocycles have exhibited extremely high conductivity.

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) was discovered in the 1980s and has since been utilized in many industries due to its ease of synthesis, high conductivity, optical properties, and stability in humidity and high temperatures. PEDOT can be easily prepared by “in situ” chemical or electrochemical oxidation methods from the 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) monomer, and is highly conductive when prepared by either route (˜101-102 S cm−1). Prior developments introduced the possibility of electropolymerization in aqueous media. Besides lowering the oxidation potential, electropolymerization in aqueous media afforded the possibility of co-electrodeposition with other anodically deposited materials, such as MnOx. The oxidation of Mn2+ in solution also occurs at a low potential, making the approach of polymerizing PEDOT and growing a MnOx film simultaneously very reasonable.

What is needed is an electrocatalyst that overcomes the limitations of the prior art.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1.0 shows a two-step preparation of a hybrid PEDOT/MnO2 nanoparticle film on a glassy carbon substrate to form an RDE working electrode or fused silica tab electrode according to an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 1A shows a schematic of the electrodeposition of MnOx/PEDOT composite thin films.

FIG. 1B shows an XRD spectra of the MnOx/PEDOT film grown on ITO, with indices for MnO2 (dotted, PDF #053-0633) and background ITO (solid, PDF #039-1058).

FIG. 1C shows CV scans in electrodeposition solutions for MnOx (dashed), PEDOT (solid), and MnOx/PEDOT (short dashed), vertical dashed line represents the optimum deposition potential, 0.75 V vs. SCE.

FIG. 2A shows a Volcano plot showing the trends in onset potential (solid squares) and half-wave potential (open squares) as the deposition potential is changed.

FIG. 2B shows a Volcano plot showing the trends in terminal current density (solid squares) and n value (open squares) as the Mn2+ deposition concentration is changed.

FIG. 2C shows a QCM plot showing the mass change vs. time of the MnOx, PEDOT, and MnOx/PEDOT depositions, individual (dotted lines) and average (solid lines) runs.

FIG. 2D shows an SEM image of a MnOx/PEDOT film grown for 40 seconds.

FIG. 2E shows an SEM image of a MnOx/PEDOT film grown for 120 seconds.

FIG. 3A shows disk current density LSVs for MnOx (dashed), PEDOT (thick solid), MnO-x/PEDOT (dotted) and 20% Pt/C (thin solid).

FIG. 3B shows ring current density LSVs for MnOx, PEDOT, MnOx/PEDOT and 20% Pt/C (same color legend as FIG. 3A).

FIG. 3C shows n value LSVs for MnOx, PEDOT, MnOx/PEDOT and 20% Pt/C (same color legend as FIG. 3A).

FIG. 3D shows peroxide percentage LSVs for MnOx, PEDOT, MnOx/PEDOT and 20% Pt/C (same color legend as FIG. 3A).

FIG. 3E shows EIS spectra for MnOx (three point circles), PEDOT (dark squares), MnOx/PEDOT (five point circles) and 20% Pt/C (light squares).

FIG. 3F shows stability and methanol experiments on MnOx/PEDOT (broken squares) and 20% Pt/C (open circles), the arrow represents the addition of methanol in to the cell at two hours.

Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to represent the same parts.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure is directed to oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) devices having electrodeposited MOx/Intrinsically conductive polymers (ICP) composite thin films and their method of making. In an embodiment, the metal may be, but is not limited to a manganese oxide and manganese dioxide (collectively referred to as manganese dioxide), ruthenium oxide or other metal oxide capable of facilitating an oxygen reduction reaction. The metal oxide may include a metal additive, such as gold and platinum, for example, in the form of a Au(metal)-MnOx/ICP composite. In an embodiment, the metal oxide may be a mixed metal ORR oxide, with a second metal oxide selected from a group including Fe, Nb and TA, oxides and perovskites. In an embodiment, the manganese oxide may be MnyOx or MnOx, from the group MnO, MnO2, MnO3, Mn3O4, Mn2O3, Mn2O7 and combinations thereof which are exemplified by MnOx or MnO2 for the remainder of the disclosure. The ICP may be, but is not limited to polythiophenes such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (PEDOT), propylenedioxythiophene (ProDOT)-phenylene polymers, and polyanilines, and polypyrolles, polyacetylenes, polyphenylenevinylenes and mixtures and unit combinations thereof.

The present disclosure is directed to oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) devices having electrodeposited MnOx/ICP composite thin films and their method of making. In an embodiment, the ORR device may be a cathode. In an embodiment, the composite films may be produced by co-electrodeposition, (electrodeposition, followed by chemical modification) or other (chemical modification followed by a general physical deposition on a substrate). The ORR device may be part of an electrocatalytic device, such as, but not limited to a fuel cell, battery or electrolyzer.

The present disclosure is further directed to methods of forming the composite thin film ORR devices by depositing the ORR thin film electrocatalyst upon a substrate. In an embodiment, the electrocatalyst may be a coating upon or within a cathode substrate, thereby forming an ORR cathode device. In an embodiment, the cathode may be part of, but not limited to a battery, fuel cell, electrolyzer, hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) device, or other device employing an ORR reaction.

In an embodiment, ORR devices having MnOx/ICP composite thin films may be formed by electrodeposition of MnOx/ICP to form a homogeneous film upon a substrate. In another embodiment, the ORR devices having MnOx/ICP composite thin films may be formed by sequentially electrochemically depositing PEDOT and MnO2 to form hybrid films of PEDOT and MnO2 nanoparticles. In an embodiment, the sequential depositing is performed by electropolymerization of EDOT to form PEDOT, followed by aqueous, room-temperature growth of MnO2 nanoparticles by MnO4 reduction. In another embodiment, the ORR devices having MnOx/ICP composite thin films may be formed by sequentially physically depositing PEDOT and MnO2 to form hybrid films of PEDOT and MnO2 nanoparticles where physically depositing includes but is not limited to drop casting or spraying.

In an embodiment, a method of forming a cathode is disclosed that includes co-depositing a MOx/ICP composite thin film upon an electrode substrate.

In another embodiment, a method of forming a cathode is disclosed that includes depositing a MOx/ICP composite thin film upon an electrode substrate, wherein the thin film is formed by depositing sequential layers of MOx and ICP.

In another embodiment, a method of forming a cathode is disclosed that includes depositing a pre-formed MOx/ICP hybrid that was formed by the chemical reaction of MnO4 ion on an existing ICP polymer.

In another embodiment, a cathode is disclosed that includes an electrodeposited MOx/ICP composite thin film upon a cathode substrate.

In another embodiment, a cathode is disclosed that includes an electrodeposited ICP thin film that is then chemically reacted in order to deposit MOx nanoparticles, thereby forming a hybrid MOx/ICP structure.

In another embodiment, a device is disclosed that includes an electrodeposited MOx/ICP composite thin film upon a cathode substrate. The device may be, but is not limited to a battery, a fuel cell, or an electrolyzer.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure is directed to composite films, electrodes including the composite films, electrocatalytic devices including the composite film electrodes, and methods of making the same. The composite films include metal oxide particles dispersed in an intrinsically conductive polymer (ICP). The metal oxide is an electrocatalytically active mater, such as but not limited to manganese oxides.

The present disclosure is further directed to methods that improve MnOx conductivity and ORR activity by hybridizing manganese oxide (MnOx) nanoparticles with an intrinsically conductive polymer (ICP), such as, but not limited to poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT). According to an embodiment, hybrid PEDOT/MnOx nanoparticle films were prepared by organic electropolymerization of the 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) monomer, followed by room temperature, aqueous growth of MnOx nanoparticles. This process is shown in FIG. 1.0. The PEDOT/MnOx film exhibits high activity toward the ORR in alkaline electrolyte, with an onset potential and half-wave potential. The PEDOT/MnOx film also shows predominantly a four-electron ORR mechanism and electrochemical selectivity in the presence of methanol.

The present disclosure is further directed to MnOx/ICP composite thin films as a highly active catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline electrolyte. The composite films may be used as a coating upon a substrate to form a cathode to be used in electrocatalytic devices. The electrocatalytic device may be, but is not limited to fuel cells, batteries and electrolyzers.

The present disclosure is further directed to methods of forming electrocatalytic devices having a MnOx/ICP composite thin film deposited thereupon.

The present disclosure is further directed to ICP polymers that have been functionalized to include cationic, anionic functional groups or sites in order to aid ionic transport.

The present disclosure is further directed to ICP polymers that have been functionalized to include fluorinated moieties, such as fluorocarbon chains to effect wettability and gas transport properties.

In an embodiment, the electrocatalytic devices having MnOx/ICP composite thin films may be formed by electrodeposition of MnOx/ICP to form homogeneous films. In another embodiment, the electrocatalytic devices having MnOx/ICP composite thin films may be formed by sequentially depositing ICP and MnO2 to form hybrid films of ICP and MnO2 nanoparticles. In an embodiment, the sequential depositing is performed by organic electropolymerization of an ICP, followed by aqueous, room-temperature growth of MnO2 nanoparticles by MnO4 reduction.

In another embodiment, a method of forming a cathode is disclosed that includes depositing a MOx/ICP composite thin film upon an electrode substrate, wherein the thin film is formed by depositing sequential layers of MOx and ICP.

In another embodiment, a method of forming a cathode is disclosed that includes depositing a pre-formed MOx/ICP hybrid that was formed by the chemical reaction of MnO4 ion with an existing ICP polymer.

According to an embodiment of the disclosure, MnOx/ICP composite thin films were electrodeposited by the aqueous micellar route in the presence of Mn2+ (see FIG. 1A to form the electrocatalytic devices. Briefly, MnOx and PEDOT were co-electrodeposited from an aqueous solution of Mn(OAc)2, EDOT, LiClO4, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at an anodic potential. MnOx only films and PEDOT only films were also electrodeposited, as controls, in the absence of EDOT or Mn(OAc)2, respectively.

FIG. 1B shows that the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of a MnOx/PEDOT film deposited on indium tin oxide coated glass (ITO, PDF #039-1058) resembles MnO2 (PDF #053-0633), but with weak intensity. Similarly electrodeposited films of MnOx have been characterized as MnO2 and MnOx in the literature. Here we will refer to the films as hydrous MnOx. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was examined in the deposition solutions in order to monitor the redox processes of manganese and EDOT. FIG. 1C shows the CV curves, between −1.0 and 1.0 V vs. SCE at 100 mV s−1, of the MnOx, PEDOT, and MnOx/PEDOT deposition solutions. Two peaks in the anodic scan of MnOx deposition appear around 0.45 V and 0.8 V vs. SCE, attributing to a change in Mn valance from 2+ to a mix of 3+ and 4+. Generation of MnO2 in potentiostatic electrodeposition is proposed to proceed through the generation of bulk Mn3+, which decomposes in to a mix of Mn2+ and Mn4+, forming MnO2 through hydrolysis.30 Oxidation current of the PEDOT deposition solution begins around −0.25 V vs. SCE, corresponding to the oligomerization and polymerization processes at the electrode surface resulting in a thin film, while the rapid current growth beginning at 0.75 V vs. SCE is consistent with the oxidation potential of EDOT in aqueous solution. In the combined MnOx/PEDOT deposition solution, the anodic current of PEDOT coincides with the oxidation processes of manganese.

Because the CV experiments were unclear in providing the optimum oxidation potential for co-deposition of MnOx and PEDOT, films were prepared at varying potentials (0.6 V-0.85 V, in 0.5 V increments) and their electrocatalytic performance compared utilizing rotating disk electrode (RDE) experiments. FIG. 2A shows the trends in ORR metrics of onset potential and half wave potential, as the deposition potential is changed. With the highest onset (0.84 V) and half-wave (0.75 V) potential values, 0.75 V vs. SCE was identified as the deposition potential resulting in the most active MnOx/PEDOT films and all future composite films were prepared at this potential. The possibility of effecting the MnOx film growth and performance by changing the concentration of Mn2+ in the deposition solution was also investigated. FIG. 2B shows the trends in ORR metrics of terminal current density and reaction order (n value), as determined from the Koutecky-Levich equation, when the Mn2+ concentration was halved (5 mM) and doubled (20 mM). With the highest terminal current density (−1.62 mA cm−2) and n value (3.74), 10 mM Mn2+ was identified as producing the most active film, and all future composite films were prepared at this concentration.

A quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) was utilized to monitor the changes in film mass during the electrodepositions. FIG. 2C shows the resulting mass change over time for the electrodeposition of MnOx, PEDOT, and MnOx/PEDOT thin films. PEDOT exhibits a near-linear growth rate between 0 and 240 seconds, while MnOx and MnOx/PEDOT show an accelerated rate between 0 and 60 seconds followed by a near-linear region between 60 and 240 seconds. The resemblance of the MnOx/PEDOT growth to MnOx is consistent with the qualitative visual observation that the first 60 seconds of co-electrodeposition is almost completely MnOx film (gold color) growth, followed by PEDOT polymerization after this initiation period (blue color). QCM was also used to quantify film growth rates, and all of the catalyst films were prepared at an identical mass loading of 40 μg cm−2.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken to examine the morphology of the films and provide further evidence of the co-electrodeposition growth process. FIGS. 2D and 2E show SEM images of MnOx/PEDOT films grown for 40 and 120 seconds, respectively. The images show the nanotextured morphology of the films, and that there is no appreciable difference in the overall morphology between 40 seconds and 120 seconds of deposition. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental analysis shows the presence of S and Mn and that their intensity is growing at a linear rate with respect to time. The S present in the film is likely due to both polymer growth and SDS incorporation in to the structure, which is known to occur with the aqueous micellar electropolymerization of PEDOT. Furthermore, cross-sectional analysis indicates that the MnOx/PEDOT films have thicknesses of 58, 84, and 111 nm for deposition times of 40, 80, and 120 seconds, respectively. These values suggest that the films become slightly denser and less porous as the deposition time increases.

Catalyst films were then grown directly on the disk electrode of a rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) in order to test their electrocatalytic activity toward the ORR. RRDE was used to simultaneously monitor the ORR current at the disk and oxidation current from generated peroxide (if any) at the ring, while scanning from low to high ORR overpotential in O2 purged and blanketed 0.1 M KOH. It was expected that the MnOx films would indicate a quasi-four-electron reduction as the intrinsic ability of MnOx to catalytically decompose peroxide is known.32-33 PEDOT, while conductive, is generally known to catalyze the ORR by the two-electron mechanism, although there is one example of a vapor phase-polymerized PEDOT operating via a 4 electron ORR process. Co-electrodeposited MnOx/PEDOT, while used for capacitors, until now has not yet been investigated for electrocatalytic ORR. FIG. 3A shows the relevant catalytic ORR data for the electrodeposited films and commercial 20% Pt/C, all at the total mass loading of 40 μg cm−2.

FIG. 3A shows the increase in ORR activity from the MnOx and PEDOT films to the MnOx/PEDOT composite film. The synergistic effect of the co-electrodeposition can be seen in the improvement in onset potential (MnOx: 0.682 V vs. RHE, PEDOT: 0.622 V, MnOx/PEDOT: 0.877 V), half-wave potential (MnOx: 0.593 V vs. RHE, PEDOT: 0.481 V, MnOx/PEDOT: 0.825 V), and terminal current density (MnOx: −0.892 mA cm−2, PEDOT: −0.971 mA cm−2, MnOx/PEDOT: −1.617 mA cm−2). Furthermore, the metric values of the MnOx/PEDOT films are equal to or better than those of commercial benchmark catalyst 20% Pt/C, with an onset potential of 0.875 V vs. RHE, a half-wave potential of 0.791 V vs. RHE, and a terminal current density of −1.667 mA cm−2. While the onset potential and terminal current values are similar, the MnOx/PEDOT film (half-wave potential: 0.825 V vs. RHE) outperforms 20% Pt/C (half-wave potential: 0.791 V) in the half-wave regime. This distinction is of importance as the half-wave region is generally around the potential in which the maximum power could be extracted from a fuel cell.34 Tafel slopes were also calculated to assess the kinetic effectiveness of each catalyst in the onset region. A low slope signifies a more effective catalyst; and the slopes trend with the overall ORR activity here, PEDOT (106 mV dec−1)>MnOx (91 mV dec−1)>20% Pt/C (87 mV dec−1)>MnOx/PEDOT (39 mV dec−1). An ORR metric comparison with all other PEDOT and PEDOT composite catalysts studied by RDE can be seen in Table Si, Supporting Information. This data shows the superior performance of the MnOx/PEDOT films prepared here when compared to other PEDOT-based ORR electrocatalysts.

Ring current linear scanning voltammetry (LSV) scans in FIG. 3B represent the current from the oxidation of peroxide being generated by the catalysts performing ORR on the disk. The PEDOT and MnOx films exhibit significantly higher ring current during the ORR, especially when considered as a ratio of ring/disk current density (PEDOT jR/jD=0.177, MnOx jR/jD=0.045, MnOx/PEDOT jR/jD=0.012, 20% Pt/C jRjD=0.003). The quantification of ring and disk current by RRDE allows an accurate calculation of the n value and percent of peroxide generated for each catalyst, based on the collection efficiency of the instrument (see Supporting Information). n values, n=4(ID)/(ID+IR/N) where ID is the disk current, IR is the ring current, and N is the collection efficiency, are shown in FIG. 3C. 20% Pt/C, as expected, showed an n value of ˜4 from low (onset, n=3.98) to high overpotential (steady-state, n=3.98) as it generally proceeds by an efficient four-electron ORR mechanism. MnOx/PEDOT exhibited a quasi-four-electron ORR mechanism, perhaps two rapid two electron transfers, with an essentially constant n value from low (onset, n=3.86) to high overpotential (steady-state, n=3.92). These values demonstrate the remarkable synergism between MnOx and PEDOT as the maximum attained n values for these catalysts individually were 3.68 and 2.96, respectively. Hence, the peroxide generation (FIG. 3D), % (H2O2)=200(IR/N)/(IR/N+ID), of the MnOx/PEDOT film was significantly lower (<5%) at all overpotentials than the MnOx (>15%) and PEDOT (>50%) films. 20% Pt/C generated<1% peroxide, further verifying its efficient reduction of oxygen.

Considering the similarity of the MnOx/PEDOT film and 20% Pt/C in ORR activity, further testing was done to assess their charge transfer and stability characteristics. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) experiments were carried out at constant half-wave current in O2-purged and blanketed 0.1 M KOH, FIG. 3E. Modeling to the equivalent Randles circuit yielded charge transfer resistance (RCT) values of 361Ω (MnOx/PEDOT), 394Ω (20% Pt/C), 478Ω (MnOx), and 3117Ω (PEDOT). RCT values calculated in the onset region of the ORR LSV yielded the same trend: 806Ω (MnOx/PEDOT), 1181Ω (20% Pt/C), 2215Ω (MnOx), and 2997Ω (PEDOT). Co-electrodeposition of MnOx and PEDOT clearly helps facilitate electron transfer during the ORR, perhaps even more efficiently than the 20% Pt/C benchmark catalyst. The intimate electrode contact realized by electrodeposition could explain the low resistances, another fundamental and practical advantage over a commercial powder electrocatalyst. Galvanostatic stability experiments were also carried out at constant half-wave current in O2 purged and blanketed 0.1 M KOH for 8400 seconds, FIG. 3F. The MnOx/PEDOT and 20% Pt/C catalysts were extremely stable over a two hour period, both retaining >97% of their activity. After two hours, methanol (5 wt. %) was introduced in order to test the catalysts' electrocatalytic selectivity for ORR in the presence of methanol (arrow—FIG. 3F). The MnOx/PEDOT film displayed higher tolerance for methanol than 20% Pt/C suggesting its compatibility with methanol fuel cells. Combined with the fact that PEDOT has been used in fuel cells to limit methanol crossover and as a catalyst support, the development of MnOx/PEDOT could find real application as an electrocatalyst in fuel cells.

In summary, MnOx/ICP composite thin films were anodically electrodeposited by an aqueous micellar route and used as electrocatalysts for the ORR. The composite MnOx/ICP thin film showed significant improvements over the MnOx and ICP control films for the ORR: 0.2-0.25 V more positive onset potential, 0.23-0.34 V more positive half-wave potential, 0.6-0.7 mA cm−2 increase in terminal current density, and 100-2700Ω decrease in RCT, as studied here. The activity of the MnOx/PEDOT proved competitive with the commercial benchmark catalyst 20% Pt/C in terms of onset potential (MnOx/PEDOT: 0.877 V vs. RHE, 20% Pt/C: 0.875 V), half-wave potential (MnOx/PEDOT: 0.825 V vs. RHE, 20% Pt/C: 0.791 V), RCT (MnOx/PEDOT: 361 Ω, 20% Pt/C: 394Ω), and exhibited superior electrocatalytic selectivity for ORR when exposed to methanol. The synergism and high activity of the MnOx/PEDOT film is attributed to the facilitated electron transport, realized by co-electrodepositing MnOx and PEDOT.

While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. An oxygen reduction reaction device, comprising:

a composite film, comprising:

a homogeneously dispersed composite film consisting essentially of a plurality of manganese oxide particles dispersed in an intrinsically conductive polymer that is a component of a cathode of an electrocatalytic device;

wherein the intrinsically conductive polymer is selected from a group consisting of PEDOT and ProDOT;

wherein the homogeneously dispersed composite film is formed by electrodeposition of the manganese oxide particles with the PEDOT or ProDOT to homogeneously disperse the manganese oxide particles in the intrinsically conductive polymer to form a composite film consisting of MnO2 and PEDOT or ProDOT; and

wherein the composite film performs an oxygen reduction reaction.

2. The device of claim 1, further comprising a substrate.

3. The device of claim 1, wherein the device is an electrode.

4. The device of claim 3, wherein the electrode is a cathode.

5. The device of claim 1, wherein the composite film is a cathode that is part of a system selected from the group consisting of batteries, fuel cells, electrolyzers, hydrogen evolution reaction devices.

6. The device of claim 1, wherein the manganese oxide particles are nanoparticles.

7. The device of claim 1, wherein the manganese oxide particles are MnO2 particles.

Resources

Images & Drawings included:

Sources:

Recent applications in this class:

Recent applications for this Assignee: