Self-Adaptive Cement Systems
US20070204765A1
2007-09-06
10/557,106
2004-05-12
Abstract:
A self-healing cement system includes cement, water and at least one additive that swells in contact with water from reservoir or from formation in the case of a structural failure in the set cement to provide a physical barrier in the zone of failure. Examples of such material include particles of super-absorbent polymer. These additives have the effect of making the cement self-healing in the event of physical failure or damage such as micro-annuli. The self healing property is produced by the contact of the water itself, the potential repair mechanism is thus activated if and when needed in case of start of loss of zonal isolation. Several super-absorbent polymers have been identified such as polyacrylamide, modified crosslinked poly(meth)acrylate and non-solute acrylic polymers.
Inventors:
- Keith Dismuke 11 🇺🇸 Katy, TX, United States
- Sylvaine Le Roy-Delage 28 🇫🇷 Paris, France
- Erik Nelson 18 🇺🇸 Houston, TX, United States
- Muriel Martin-Beurel 1 🇫🇷 Lescar, France
Interested in similar patents?
Get notified when new applications in this technology area are published.
Classification:
C04B24/2652 » CPC main
Use of organic materials as active ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone, e.g. plasticisers; Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds Nitrogen containing polymers, e.g. polyacrylamides, polyacrylonitriles
C04B28/02 » CPC further
Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing inorganic binders or the reaction product of an inorganic and an organic binder, e.g. polycarboxylate cements containing hydraulic cements other than calcium sulfates
C09K8/467 » CPC further
Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations; Compositions for cementing, e.g. for cementing casings into boreholes; Compositions for plugging, e.g. for killing wells containing inorganic binders, e.g. Portland cement containing additives for specific purposes
C04B2103/0049 » CPC further
Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Polymers chosen for their physico-chemical characteristics Water-swellable polymers
C04B2111/00146 » CPC further
Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use; Physico-chemical characteristics of the mixtures Sprayable or pumpable mixtures
C04B2111/00155 » CPC further
Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use; Physico-chemical characteristics of the mixtures; Sprayable or pumpable mixtures Sprayable, i.e. concrete-like, materials able to be shaped by spraying instead of by casting, e.g. gunite
C04B2103/22 » CPC further
Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Retarders Set retarders
C04B2103/408 » CPC further
Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Surface-active agents, dispersants Dispersants
C04B2103/46 » CPC further
Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone Water-loss or fluid-loss reducers, hygroscopic or hydrophilic agents, water retention agents
C04B40/0641 » CPC further
Processes, in general, for influencing or modifying the properties of mortars, concrete or artificial stone compositions, e.g. their setting or hardening ability; Inhibiting the setting, e.g. mortars of the deferred action type containing water in breakable containers ; Inhibiting the action of active ingredients Mechanical separation of ingredients, e.g. accelerator in breakable microcapsules
C04B22/124 » CPC further
Use of inorganic materials as active ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone, e.g. accelerators, shrinkage compensating agents; Acids or salts thereof containing halogen in the anion Chlorides of ammonium or of the alkali or alkaline earth metals, e.g. calcium chloride
C04B2103/0051 » CPC further
Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Polymers chosen for their physico-chemical characteristics Water-absorbing polymers, hydrophilic polymers
C04B2103/12 » CPC further
Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Accelerators; Activators Set accelerators
C04B14/08 » CPC further
Use of inorganic materials as fillers, e.g. pigments, for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Treatment of inorganic materials specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Granular materials, e.g. microballoons; Silica-rich materials; Silicates Diatomaceous earth
C04B20/0076 » CPC further
Use of materials as fillers for mortars, concrete or artificial stone according to more than one of groups  - and characterised by shape or grain distribution; Treatment of materials according to more than one of the groups  - specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Expanding or defibrillating materials characterised by the grain distribution
C04B24/2641 » CPC further
Use of organic materials as active ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone, e.g. plasticisers; Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds Polyacrylates; Polymethacrylates
C04B40/0071 » CPC further
Processes, in general, for influencing or modifying the properties of mortars, concrete or artificial stone compositions, e.g. their setting or hardening ability making use of a rise in pressure
C04B24/2676 » CPC further
Use of organic materials as active ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone, e.g. plasticisers; Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds Polystyrenes
C04B40/0259 » CPC further
Processes, in general, for influencing or modifying the properties of mortars, concrete or artificial stone compositions, e.g. their setting or hardening ability; Selection of the hardening environment Hardening promoted by a rise in pressure
C04B2103/50 » CPC further
Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone Defoamers, air detrainers
C04B40/0028 » CPC further
Processes, in general, for influencing or modifying the properties of mortars, concrete or artificial stone compositions, e.g. their setting or hardening ability Aspects relating to the mixing step of the mortar preparation
C04B40/0675 » CPC further
Processes, in general, for influencing or modifying the properties of mortars, concrete or artificial stone compositions, e.g. their setting or hardening ability; Inhibiting the setting, e.g. mortars of the deferred action type containing water in breakable containers ; Inhibiting the action of active ingredients Mortars activated by rain, percolating or sucked-up water; Self-healing mortars or concrete
C04B20/008 » CPC further
Use of materials as fillers for mortars, concrete or artificial stone according to more than one of groups  - and characterised by shape or grain distribution; Treatment of materials according to more than one of the groups  - specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Expanding or defibrillating materials characterised by the grain distribution Micro- or nanosized fillers, e.g. micronised fillers with particle size smaller than that of the hydraulic binder
C04B2103/0062 » CPC further
Function or property of ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Polymers chosen for their physico-chemical characteristics Cross-linked polymers
C04B24/00 IPC
Use of organic materials as active ingredients for mortars, concrete or artificial stone, e.g. plasticisers
C04B7/00 IPC
Cements
C04B7/00 IPC
Hydraulic cements
C04B40/00 IPC
Processes, in general, for influencing or modifying the properties of mortars, concrete or artificial stone compositions, e.g. their setting or hardening ability
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to adaptive cement systems. In particular, the invention relates to cement systems which are “self-healing”, i.e. system which can adapt to compensate for changes or faults in the physical structure of the cement, or which adapt their structure after the setting phase of the cement in the cementing of oil, gas, water or geothermal wells, or the like.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONDuring the construction of underground wells, it is common, during and after drilling, to place a liner or casing, secured by cement pumped into the annulus around the outside of the liner. The cement serves to support the liner and to provide isolation of the various fluid-producing zones through which the well passes. This later function is important since it prevents fluids from different layers contaminating each other. For example, the cement prevents formation fluids from entering the water table and polluting drinking water, or prevents water from passing into the well instead of oil or gas. In order to fulfill this function, it is necessary that the cement be present as an impermeable continuous sheath. However, for various reasons, over time this sheath can deteriorate and become permeable. The deterioration can be due to physical stresses caused by tectonic movements of temperature effects, chemical degradation of the cement, or various other reasons.
There have been a number of proposals to deal with the problems of deterioration of the cement sheath over time. One approach is to design the cement sheath to take into account physical stresses that might be encountered during its lifetime. Such an approach is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,296,057. Another approach is to include in the cement composition materials that improve the physical properties of the set cement. U.S. Pat. No. 6,458,198 describes the addition of amorphous metal fibers to the cement slurry to improve its strength and resistance to impact damage. EP 1129047 and WO 00/37387 describe the addition of flexible materials (rubber or polymers) to the cement to confer a degree of flexibility on the cement sheath. WO 01/70646 and PCT/EP03/01578 describe cement compositions that are formulated so as to be less sensitive to the effects of temperature on the cement when setting.
A number of proposals have been made for designs of self-healing concretes for use in the construction industry. These are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,841, U.S. Pat. No. 5,660,624, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,334, U.S. Pat. No. 6,261,360 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,849, and in “Three designs for the internal release of sealants, adhesives, and waterproofing chemicals into concrete to reduce permeability”, Dry, C. M., Cement and Concrete Research 30 (2000) 1969-1977. None of these are immediately applicable to well cementing operations because of the need for the cement to be pumpable during placement and because of the pressure and temperature range.
It is an objective of the present invention to provide well cementing systems that can be placed by pumping in the normal manner, and which contain materials that allow the cement sheath to adapt its structure in response to environmental conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONMore precisely, the present invention aims at providing well cementing systems that include at least one additive that reacts and/or swells when the set cement is in contact with an aqueous fluid, such as formation waters. This behavior has the effect of making the cement self-healing in the event of physical failure or damage.
The additive is a material which reacts/expands in contact with water—for instance from the underground formation which enters a fault in the cement matrix. Examples of such materials include super-absorbent polymers. Super-absorbent polymers are crosslinked networks of flexible polymer chains. The most efficient water absorbers are polymer networks that carry dissociated, ionic functional groups. When super-absorbent polymers absorb liquids, an elastic gel forms. The gel is a soft, deformable solid composed of water and the expanded polymer chains.
The polymer particles can be of almost any shape and size: spherical, fiber-like, ovoid, mesh systems, ribbons, etc., which allows their easy incorporation in cement slurries of comprising solid materials in discrete particle size bands. In practice, polymer particles ranging from about 10 to about 1500 ÎĽ can be used.
The absorbent materials are preferably dry blended with the cement and any other solid components before transport to the well-site, mixing with water and placement in the well. The sizes and quantities will be selected to allow even dispersion through the cement matrix.
It has been found that though the super-absorbent polymers such as polyacrylamide and modified crosslinked polymethacrylate swell when incorporated in a cement slurry, they seem to release at least part of the absorbed water during the cement hydration and hence, have a reserve of absorbability that allow them to swell again if they are later exposed to water due to a crack of the matrix for instance. Since they are highly reactive with water, the concentration of super-absorbent added to the blend must remain relatively small, compositions with more than 3.2% of super-absorbent (by weight, of cement) may typically have a viscosity too high for pumping the slurry in favorable conditions. In fact the maximum SAP concentration depends on the slurry density and also on the nature of the Super Absorbent Polymer.
It has been found that the addition of salts such as sodium chloride or calcium chloride for instance favors the rheology of the systems thereby enabling increasing the concentration of super-absorbent polymers. Cement slurries of lower density have also a greater acceptability of higher concentrations of super-absorbent polymers, even without salt.
In another aspect of the present invention, at least part of the super-absorbent polymers are encapsulated so that they are—for instance in the form of a resin or other material that releases the polymer in response to exposure to a downhole parameter (for instance such as temperature, a specific mineral system, pressure, shear etc). In yet another aspect, the rupture of the encapsulating means is actually induced by the failure of the cement matrix, in a way similar to the mechanism described by Dry for instance in U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,841, U.S. Pat. No. 5,660,624, U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,334, U.S. Pat. No. 6,261,360 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,849.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONA screening has been carried out for identifying super-absorbent polymers suitable for self-healing cementing applications. The main issues were to check the ability to dry blend the polymers with cement and to optimize the rheology and thickening time.
Testing ProcedureTests have been carrying out by incorporating powders of various types of polymers as solid additives in cement slurries. Properties of the slurry as well as properties of the set cement have been studied.
The slurries were optimized with the mere objective of obtaining stability. Focus was to get acceptable plastic viscosity (PV) and yield stress (TY) at mixing time and after 20 minutes of conditioning. Free water and sedimentation tests were also carried out. Mixing and test procedure was according to API Spec 10.
The same equipment and bob was used for all rheology measurements, whatever the tested design. Many tests were performed at one slurry density (15.8 lbm/gal) and one temperature (BHCT equal to 60° C.). Some examples were studied at 12 lbm/gal and at 14 lbm/gal. For lowest density, the temperature is equal 25° C. and 85° C. The design is based on tap water and black Dyckerhoff North cement. Unless otherwise mentioned, all designs include an antifoam agent based on polypropylene glycol at 0.03 gallon per US gallons per sack of 94 lbs of cement (in other words, 1 gps=88.78 cc/kg), polynapthalene sulfonate as dispersing agent at 0.04 gps and the superabsorbent polymer at concentration ranging form 0.1% BWOC (by weight of cement) to 0.9% BWOC for 15.8 lbm/gal. Decreasing the density allows to increase the concentration in Super Absorbent Polymer. For instance for a given SAP the maximum concentration at 15.8 lbm/gal is 1% bwoc without salt in the mixing water and can reach 3% bwoc at 12 lbm/gal.
Three types of superabsorbent polymers were tested:. S1, a polyacrylamide available form Lamberti, Italy. Three grades were tested, namely S1G-Lamseal® G, with particles ranging form 500 μ to 1500 μ (density 1.25 g/cm3), S1GS-Lamseal® GS, with particles of about 200 μ (density 1.48 g/cm3), and S1GM, Lamseal® GM, with particles of about 700μ(density 1.47 g/cm3). S2, a modified polyacrylate available from Itochu, Japan, under the name Aqualic® CS-6HM, selected for its salt resistance, in particular its capacity to keep super absorbent capacity in high valent metal ions solutions. The average particle size is 100 μ and the density 1.46 g/cm3. S3, a non soluble acrylic polymers , Norsocryl C200 from Atofina with particles of about 250 μ in average (density 1.6 g/cm3).
In the examples, bwoc or BWOC stands for by weight of cement and bwow or BWOW for by weight of water.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Example 1 Addition ProcedureThe first step was to define the best addition process. As shown in table 1 below, dry blending induces lower effects on rheology and free water and leads to an easy mixing
| TABLE 1 | ||||
| Design | Reference | A1 | A2 | A3 |
| S1G (% bwoc) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
| Note | prehydrated | prehydrated | ||
| (static) | dry blended | under agitation | ||
| at 2000 RPM | ||||
| during 15 | ||||
| minutes. |
| Mixing rheology |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 2.3 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 3.2 |
| PV (cP) | 25.5 | 18.9 | 27.2 | 32.4 |
| BHCT rheology at 60° C. |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 24.6 | 21.2 | 27.3 | 52.8 |
| PV (cP) | 20.9 | 18.4 | 26.6 | 33.3 |
| 10′/1′gel | 25/16 | 14/9 | 19/11 | 15/13 |
| Free Water mL | 1 | 7 | trace | 2.5 |
| Sedimentation | 1.14 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| ppg | ||||
For the S1 particles, the finer the particles, the higher the rheology and free water.
| TABLE 2 | |||||
| Design | Reference | S1 G | S1 GM | S1GS | |
| S1 (% bwoc) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Mixing rheology |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 6.7 | |
| PV (cP) | 25.5 | 27.2 | 29 | 41 |
| BHCT rheology at 60° C. |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 24.6 | 27.3 | 24.4 | 38.7 | |
| PV (cP) | 20.9 | 26.6 | 35.6 | 40.9 | |
| 10′/1′gel | 25/16 | 19/11 | 15/12 | 12/9 | |
| Free Water mL | 1 | trace | 2 | 4 | |
| Sedimentation ppg | 1.14 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.9 | |
This test shows that cement slurry with super-absorbent polymers S1 are compatible with conventional fluid loss control additive (flac). This shows that the composition of the present invention can still be optimized by the addition of conventional additives such as dispersing agent, fluid loss control agent, set retarder, set accelerator and anti-foaming agent.
| TABLE 3 | |||
| Design | X3.1 | X3.2 | |
| S1G (% bwoc) | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
| Flac | 0.4 | ||
| Mixing rheology | |||
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 1.4 | 7.9 | |
| PV (cP) | 27.2 | 104.7 | |
| BHCT rheology at 60° C. | |||
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 27.3 | 13.7 | |
| PV (cP) | 26.6 | 125 | |
| 10′/1′gel | 19/11 | 13/7 | |
| Free Water mL | trace | trace | |
Results with the polymethacrylate based superabsorbent polymer S2 show less sensitivity to the addition mode.
| TABLE 4.1 | |||||
| Design | Reference | X4.1 | X4.2 | X4.3 | X4.4 |
| S2 (% bwoc) | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.15 | |
| — | dry blended | dry blended | prehydrated | dry blended | |
| Mixing rheology | |||||
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 2.3 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 6.4 | 5.3 |
| PV (cP) | 25.5 | 31.9 | 35.9 | 37.9 | 64.8 |
| BHCT rheology at 60° C. |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 24.6 | 20.2 | 23.3 | 20.7 | 19.9 |
| PV (cP) | 20.9 | 24.3 | 22.4 | 30.3 | 57 |
| 10′/1′gel | 25/16 | 17/9 | 15/9 | 12/7 | 12/10 |
| Free Water mL | 1 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 5.5 | |
| Sedimentation ppg | 1.14 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1 |
Polymer S2 can also be added in higher quantity, at least up to 0.45% BWOC as shown in the following table 4.2:
| TABLE 4.2 | |||||
| Design | Reference | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| antifoam (gps) | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Dispersing agent (gps) | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| S2 (% bwoc) | 0 | 0.9 (exces) | 0.2 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| S2 (% bwow) | 0 | 2 | 0.44 | 1 | 1 |
| Remarque | dry blended | dry blended | dry blended | prehydrated |
| Mixing rheology |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 2.3 | Too | 8.3 | 19.7 | 24.9 |
| PV (cP) | 25.5 | viscous | 52.2 | 142.8 | 228.7 |
| Comment | Difficult mixing |
| BHCT rheology at 60° C. |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 24.6 | Too viscous | 14.3 | 25.8 | 11.6 |
| PV (cP) | 20.9 | 40.3 | 172.5 | 178.4 | |
| 10′/1′gel | 25/16 | 14/9 | 25/7 | 18/9 | |
| Free water mL | 1 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 4.5 |
| Sedim ppg | 1.14 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
This example shows that the setting properties and the rheological properties can be optimized, a key requirement for well cementing applications. In all cases, the super-absorbent polymer was dry blended with the cement.
| TABLE 5.1 | |||
| Design | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| S2 (% bwoc) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Antifoam (gps) | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Lignosulfonate (gps) | 0.05 | — | 0.025 |
| Fluid loss control agent (gps) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Polynaphtalene (gps) | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.045 |
| Mixing | Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 10.4 | 11 | 10.6 |
| rheology | PV (cP) | 121.9 | 134 | 125.8 |
| BHCT | Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 15.5 | 16.7 | 16 |
| rheology | PV (cP) | 132 | 132.4 | 129 |
| at 60° C. | 10′/1′gel | 24/10 | 9/5 | 12/7 |
| Free water mL | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Sedimentation ppg | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | |
| Thickening test 100 Bc | 13 h 30 min | 3 h 03 min | 8 h 49 min | |
| (hh:min) | ||||
| TABLE 5.2 | ||||
| Design | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 |
| Antifoam (gps) | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Lignosulfonate (gps) | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.025 |
| Fluid loss control agent (gps) | 0.4 | 0.4 | — | 0.2 |
| Polynaphtalene (gps) | 0.045 | 0.6 | 0.045 | 0.045 |
| Mixing rheology | ||||
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 46.8 | 41.9 | 23 | 32 |
| PV(cP) | 303 | 293 | 92 | 154 |
| BHCT rheology at 60° C. | ||||
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 32 | 35 | 6.6 | 19 |
| PV(cP) | 226 | 248 | 66 | 145 |
| 10′/1′gel | 12/7 | 11/6 | 11/7 | 9/4 |
| Free water mL | Trace | Trace | 10 | 2.5 |
In the table 5.2, the designed slurries have a density of 15.8 lbm/gal, and the concentration of super-absorbent S2 is 0.3% bwoc (corresponding to 0.7% bwow).
| TABLE 5.3 | ||||
| Design | 33 | 34 | 35 | |
| Antifoam (gps) | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| Lignosulfonate (gps) | 0.025 | 0.025 | — | |
| NaCl (by weight of water) | 37 | |||
| Fluid loss control agent (gps) | 0.2 | 0.15 | — | |
| Polynaphtalene (gps) | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.9 | |
| Mixing rheology | ||||
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 46.8 | 45 | 4.4 | |
| PV (cP) | 223 | 208 | 61 | |
| BHCT rheology at 60° C. | ||||
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 27 | 50 | 14 | |
| PV (cP) | 217 | 240 | 51 | |
| 10′/1′gel | 10/5 | 10/7 | 20/9 | |
| Free water mL | 1.5 | 1 | — | |
| API Fluid loss (ml) | 170 | |||
In the table 5.3, the designed slurries have a density of 15.8 lbm/gal, and the concentration of super-absorbent S2 is 0.4% bwoc (corresponding to 0.9% bwow).
Example 6This example shows that the addition of a salt allows an increase of the concentration of superabsorbent polymer while keeping acceptable rheology properties. In table 6.1, tests have been carried out with sodium chloride as added salt. In table 6.2, the added salt is calcium chloride. In both tables, the cements have a density of 15.8 ppg.
| TABLE 6.1 | ||||
| Design | 1 | 36 | 37 | 38 |
| S2 (% bwoc) | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Antifoam (gps) | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| NaCl (by weight of water) | 0 | 37 | 18.5 | 37 |
| Polynaphtalene (gps) | 0.04 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
| Mixing rheology |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | Too viscous | 13.4 | 27.1 | 61.8 |
| PV (cP) | 119 | 207 | 352 |
| BHCT rheology at 60° C. |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 30.7 | 31.5 | 59 | |
| PV (cP) | 107 | 1059 | 433 | |
| 10′/1′gel | 28/19 | — | 433 | |
| Free water mL | Trace | |||
| TABLE 6.2 | |||
| Design | 70 | 81 | |
| Antifoam (gps) | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Flac (gps) | 0.5 | — | |
| Lignosulfonate (gps) | 0.05 | — | |
| Polynaphtalene (gps) | — | 0.9 | |
| Sulfonated melamine-formaldehyde (gps) | 0.12 | — | |
| Sodium chloride (% BWOW) | — | 37 | |
| Calcium chloride (% BWOC) | 2 | — | |
| S2 (% BWOC) | 0.45 | 0.9 | |
| Mixing rheology | |||
| Ty (lbf/100ft2) | 29 | 30 | |
| PV (cP) | 244 | 173 | |
| BHCT tests at 60° C. | |||
| Rheology | |||
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 34 | 22 | |
| PV(cP) | 211 | 110 | |
| 10′gel/1′stiring | 17/9 | 23/10 | |
| Free water (mL) | 0 | 0 | |
| Fluid loss (mL API) | 78 | 18 | |
| Thickening time | 5 h 17 min | — | |
This example shows that if the slurry density is lower, higher concentration of super-absorbent polymers can be used, even without the addition of a salt.
| Design | X7.1 | X7.2 | X7.3 | |
| Density (lbm/gal) | 14 | 12 | 12 | |
| BHCT (deg C.) | 60 | 25 | 85 | |
| Antifoam (gps) | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| Flac (gps) | 0.4 | — | — | |
| Lignosulfonate (gps) | 0.025 | — | — | |
| Polynaphtalene (gps) | 0.045 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| S2 (% bwoc) | 0.9 | 3 | 3 | |
| S2 (% bwow) | 1.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Mixing rheology |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 21.18 | 19.2 | 19.63 | |
| PV (cP) | 156.9 | 90.3 | 86.39 |
| Rheology at BHCT |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 49.31 | 27.5 | 4.92 | |
| PV (cP) | 180.5 | 169.7 | 82.78 | |
| 10′gel/1′stiring | 32/22 | 28/12 | 11/6 | |
| Fluid loss (mL API) | — | 149 | 240 | |
Cement samples comprising super-absorbent polymers were taken form the sedimentation column and additional water was added at the surface of broken pieces to simulate contact with formation water after a crack. Tests were performed at room temperature and at 60° C. In all cases, swelling was observed showing that the super-absorbent polymer particles remain effectively available to absorb additional water (even though the cement matrix always comprises residual water).
Example 9This test was performed with super-absorbent S3. Good rheology is obtained.
| TABLE 9 | |||
| Design | 5 | 13 | 19 |
| Density (lbm/gal) | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.8 |
| BHCT (deg C.) | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Antifoam (gps) | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Flac (gps) | 0.5 | 0.4 | — |
| Lignosulfonate (gps) | 0.05 | 0.025 | — |
| Polynaphtalene (gps) | — | 0.05 | 0.9 |
| Sulfonated melamine formaldehyde (gps) | 0.12 | — | — |
| Sodium chloride (% BWOW) | — | — | 37 |
| Calcium chloride (% BWOC) | 2 | — | — |
| S3 (% bwoc) | 3 | 0.9 | 2 |
| S3 (% bwow) | 7.7 | 2.2 | 4.5 |
| Mixing rheology |
| Ty(lbf/100 ft2) | 26 | 19 | 4 |
| PV (cP) | 262 | 195 | 54 |
| BHCT Rheology |
| Ty (lbf/100 ft2) | 13 | 19 | 4 |
| PV (cP) | 154 | 145 | 30 |
| 10′gel/1′stiring | 7/5 | 14/4 | 15/6 |
| Free water (mL) | 0 | 0 | — |
| Fluid loss (mL API) | 48 | — | — |
Claims
1. A composition for well cementing comprising:
i. a pumpable slurry of cement,
ii. water and
iii. a material having residual water-absorption properties after the setting of the cement, so that said material is susceptible to swell in contact with underground water in case of failure of the cement matrix.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein said material is a super-absorbent polymer.
3. The cement system of claim 1, wherein the super-absorbent polymer is selected from the list consisting of polymethacrylate and polyacrylamide or a non-soluble acrylic polymers.
4. The cement system of claim 2, wherein the super-absorbent polymer is added to the slurry dry-blended with the cement.
5. The cement system of claim 2, wherein the super-absorbent polymer is added at a concentration between 0.05% and 3.2% by weight of cement.
6. The cement system of claim 2 further comprising a salt.
7. The cement system of claim 6, wherein said salt is sodium chloride or calcium chloride.
8. The cement slurry of claim 2, wherein the super-absorbent polymer is added under the form of particles ranging from 10 ÎĽm to 1500 ÎĽm.
9. The cement system of claim 1, whereby the material is provided in a capsule that releases the material in response to exposure of the cement to at least one downhole parameter.
10. The cement system of claim 1, whereby the material is provided in a capsule that releases the material when the cement matrix cracks.
11. The cement system of claim 1 further comprising at least one additive selected from the list consisting of dispersing agent, fluid loss control agent, set retarder, set accelerator and anti-foaming agent.
12. The cement system of claim 2 whereby the material is provided in a capsule that releases the material in response to exposure of the cement to at least one downhole parameter.
13. The cement system of claim 2 whereby the material is provided in a capsule that releases the material when the cement matrix cracks.
14. The cement system of claim 2 further comprising at least one additive selected from the list consisting of dispersing agent, fluid loss control agent, set retarder, set accelerator and anti-foaming agent.