Patent application title:

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING CHILDHOOD OBESITY

Publication number:

US20210038166A1

Publication date:
Application number:

16/985,375

Filed date:

2020-08-05

Abstract:

A method of predicting likelihood for childhood obesity, comprises: obtaining a plurality of parameters, wherein at least a few of the parameters characterize an infant or toddler subject. A machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity is feed with the plurality of parameters. An output indicative of a likelihood that the infant or toddler subject is expected to develop childhood obesity is received from the procedure. The output is related non-linearly to the parameters.

Inventors:

Assignee:

Interested in similar patents?

Get notified when new applications in this technology area are published.

Classification:

A61B5/7275 »  CPC main

Measuring for diagnostic purposes ; Identification of persons; Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes; Specific aspects of physiological measurement analysis Predicting development of a medical condition based on physiological measurements, e.g. determining a risk factor

A61B5/48 »  CPC further

Measuring for diagnostic purposes ; Identification of persons Other medical applications

A61B5/14507 »  CPC further

Measuring for diagnostic purposes ; Identification of persons; Measuring characteristics of blood , e.g. gas concentration, pH value; Measuring characteristics of body fluids or tissues, e.g. interstitial fluid, cerebral tissue specially adapted for measuring characteristics of body fluids other than blood

A61B2503/045 »  CPC further

Evaluating a particular growth phase or type of persons or animals; Babies, e.g. for SIDS detection Newborns, e.g. premature baby monitoring

A61B2503/06 »  CPC further

Evaluating a particular growth phase or type of persons or animals Children, e.g. for attention deficit diagnosis

A61B5/00 IPC

Measuring for diagnostic purposes ; Identification of persons

A61B5/145 IPC

Measuring for diagnostic purposes ; Identification of persons Measuring characteristics of blood , e.g. gas concentration, pH value; Measuring characteristics of body fluids or tissues, e.g. interstitial fluid, cerebral tissue

G06N20/00 »  CPC further

Machine learning

G16H10/60 »  CPC further

ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records

G16H10/20 »  CPC further

ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data for electronic clinical trials or questionnaires

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/882,623 filed on Aug. 5, 2019, the contents of which are all incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein in their entirety.

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention, in some embodiments thereof, relates to medicine and, more particularly, but not exclusively, to a method and system for predicting childhood obesity.

Over the past decades, the prevalence of childhood obesity has rapidly increased worldwide. A global analysis demonstrated that in 2016, 50 million girls and 74 million boys worldwide were obese, making it a global public health crisis. Obese children are very likely to have obesity persist into adulthood. Childhood obesity is associated with elevated blood pressure and lipids, and increased risk of diseases, such as asthma, type 2 diabetes, arthritis, and cardiovascular diseases at a later stage of life. Furthermore, childhood obesity can have a negative psycho-social effect.

Preventing excess weight gain in children is important for numerous reasons. Pediatric obesity is a multisystem disease that can greatly impact a child's physical and mental health. It is associated with a greater risk for premature mortality and earlier onset of chronic disorders such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, ischemic heart disease and type 2 diabetes, with insulin resistance identified in obese children as young as 5 years of age. Furthermore, there is currently an underestimation of obesity by parents and physicians and there is currently little guidance for health care professionals to identify infants at risk. Additionally, young age is a suitable time period for intervention, as it is associated with more beneficial long-term outcomes after lifestyle modifications.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method of predicting likelihood for childhood obesity. The method comprises: obtaining a plurality of parameters, wherein at least a few of the parameters characterize an infant or toddler subject; accessing a computer readable medium storing a machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity; feeding the procedure with the plurality of parameters; and receiving from the procedure an output indicative of a likelihood that the infant or toddler subject is expected to develop childhood obesity, wherein the output is related non-linearly to the parameters.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from an electronic health record associated with the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the method comprises presenting to a user, by a user interface, a questionnaire and a set of questionnaire controls, receiving a set of response parameters entered by the user using the questionnaire controls, wherein the plurality of parameters comprises the response parameters.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from a body liquid test applied to the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter characterizing a parent or a sibling of the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the at least one parameter characterizing the parent comprises a parameter extracted from a body liquid test applied to the parent or sibling.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from a diagnosis previously recorded for the subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter indicative of a pharmaceutical prescribed for the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the infant or toddler subject is less than two years of age.

According to some embodiments of the invention the infant or toddler subject is not obese. According to some embodiments of the invention the method wherein the infant or toddler subject has a normal weight. According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises a weight-for-length score of the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprise a weight of the infant or toddler subject at age of from about 4 to about 6 months, a weight of the infant or toddler subject at age of from about 12 to about 16 months, and a weight of the infant or toddler subject at age of from about 18 to about 22 months.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises a parameter pertaining to a body-mass-index of a sibling of the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises a parameter pertaining to a body-mass-index of a father of the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises a result of a hemoglobin concentration test applied to the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the wherein the plurality of parameters comprises a result of a mean platelet volume test applied to the infant or toddler subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 10 or at least 20 or at least 30 or at least 40 or at least 50 or at least 100 or at least 200 or at least 300 or at least 400 or at least 500 or more of the parameters listed in Table 1.1.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 10 or at least 12 or at least 14 or at least 16 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-40 more preferably lines 1-30 more preferably lines 1-20 of Table 1.1.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 20 or at least 22 or at least 24 or at least 26 or at least 28 or at least 30 or at least 32 or at least 34 or at least 36 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-50 more preferably lines 1-45 more preferably lines 1-40 of Table 1.1.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises least 50 or at least 60 or at least 70 or at least 80 or at least 90 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-300 more preferably lines 1-200 more preferably lines 1-100 of

Table 1.1.

According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method of predicting likelihood for childhood obesity. The method comprises: obtaining a plurality of parameters characterizing at least one of a parent and a sibling of an unborn subject; accessing a computer readable medium storing a machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity; feeding the procedure with the plurality of parameters; and receiving from the procedure an output indicative of a likelihood that the unborn subject is expected to develop childhood obesity after birth, wherein the output is related non-linearly to the parameters.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from an electronic health record associated with the at least one of the parent and the sibling.

According to some embodiments of the invention the method comprises presenting to a user, by a user interface, a questionnaire and a set of questionnaire controls, receiving a set of response parameters entered by the user using the questionnaire controls, wherein the plurality of parameters comprises the response parameters.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from a body liquid test applied to the at least one of the parent and the sibling.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises a parameter pertaining to a body-mass-index of the sibling.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises a parameter pertaining to a body-mass-index of a father of the unborn subject.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 10 or at least 20 or at least 30 or at least 40 or at least 50 or at least 100 or at least 200 or at least 300 or at least 400 or at least 500 or at least 1,000 or at least 1,500 or more of the parameters listed in Table 1.2.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 10 or at least 12 or at least 14 or at least 16 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-40 more preferably lines 1-30 more preferably lines 1-20 of Table 1.2.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 20 or at least 22 or at least 24 or at least 26 or at least 28 or at least 30 or at least 32 or at least 34 or at least 36 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-50 more preferably lines 1-45 more preferably lines 1-40 of Table 1.2.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises least 50 or at least 60 or at least 70 or at least 80 or at least 90 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-300 more preferably lines 1-200 more preferably lines 1-100 of Table 1.2.

According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method of predicting likelihood for childhood obesity. The method comprises: presenting on a user interface a questionnaire and a set of questionnaire controls, and receiving from the user interface a set of response parameters entered using the questionnaire controls, wherein the set of response parameters characterizes an infant or toddler subject; accessing a computer readable medium storing a machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity; feeding the procedure with the set of parameters; and receiving from the procedure an output indicative of a likelihood that the infant or toddler subject is expected to develop childhood obesity, wherein the output is related non-linearly to the parameters.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 10 or at least 20 or at least 30 or at least 40 or at least 50 or more of the parameters listed in Table 1.3.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 10 or at least 12 or at least 14 or at least 16 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-40 more preferably lines 1-30 more preferably lines 1-20 of Table 1.3.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 20 or at least 22 or at least 24 or at least 26 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-50 more preferably lines 1-40 more preferably lines 1-30 of Table 1.3.

According to an aspect of some embodiments of the present invention there is provided a method of predicting likelihood for childhood obesity. The method comprises: presenting on a user interface a questionnaire and a set of questionnaire controls, and receiving from the user interface a set of response parameters entered using the questionnaire controls, wherein the set of response parameters characterizes at least one of a parent and a sibling of an unborn subject; accessing a computer readable medium storing a machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity; feeding the procedure with the set of parameters; and receiving from the procedure an output indicative of a likelihood that the unborn subject is expected to develop childhood obesity after birth, wherein the output is related non-linearly to the parameters.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 5 or at least 10 or at least 15 or more of the parameters listed in Table 1.4.

According to some embodiments of the invention the plurality of parameters comprises at least 5 or at least 10 of the parameters that are listed at lines 1-15 of Table 1.4.

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and/or scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments of the invention, exemplary methods and/or materials are described below. In case of conflict, the patent specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and are not intended to be necessarily limiting.

Implementation of the method and/or system of embodiments of the invention can involve performing or completing selected tasks manually, automatically, or a combination thereof. Moreover, according to actual instrumentation and equipment of embodiments of the method and/or system of the invention, several selected tasks could be implemented by hardware, by software or by firmware or by a combination thereof using an operating system.

For example, hardware for performing selected tasks according to embodiments of the invention could be implemented as a chip or a circuit. As software, selected tasks according to embodiments of the invention could be implemented as a plurality of software instructions being executed by a computer using any suitable operating system. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, one or more tasks according to exemplary embodiments of method and/or system as described herein are performed by a data processor, such as a computing platform for executing a plurality of instructions. Optionally, the data processor includes a volatile memory for storing instructions and/or data and/or a non-volatile storage, for example, a magnetic hard-disk and/or removable media, for storing instructions and/or data. Optionally, a network connection is provided as well. A display and/or a user input device such as a keyboard or mouse are optionally provided as well.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

Some embodiments of the invention are herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of embodiments of the invention. In this regard, the description taken with the drawings makes apparent to those skilled in the art how embodiments of the invention may be practiced.

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a flowchart diagram of a method suitable for predicting likelihood for childhood obesity, according to various exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a client-server configuration which can be used according to some embodiments of the present invention for predicting likelihood for childhood obesity, according to some embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a dataset of nationwide health records used in a study directed to a prediction of childhood obesity and an analysis of risk, according to some embodiments of the present invention.

FIGS. 4A-D show BMI dynamics in early childhood, as obtained in experiments performed according to some embodiments of the present invention. FIG. 4A shows mean BMI z-score for children who were obese (upper curve) versus non obese (lower curve) at 13 years of age. FIG. 4B shows mean change in annual BMI-scores for the same groups of children. Shaded areas are 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. FIG. 4C shows obesity status transition of the study cohort. Left side: distribution of obesity status at the last available routine checkup before 2 years of age. Right side: distribution of obesity status at 5-6 years of age. Transitions from different obesity states between these two time points are presented. FIG. 4D shows distribution of obesity status at infancy for obese 5-6 years old children.

FIGS. 5A-D show evaluation of obesity prediction model constructed in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. FIG. 5A shows ROC curve of the model of the present embodiments (solid line) and a baseline model based on the last available routine checkup measurement (dashed). The dots and percentages represent different decision probability thresholds. FIG. 5B is calibration curve. The dots represents deciles of predicted probabilities. The dotted diagonal line represents an ideal calibration. The histogram at the bottom represents predicted probabilities of normal-weight children and obese children. FIG. 5C shows a Precision-Recall curve. The Baseline model is marked with an X. Threshold percentiles are marked on the curves. FIG. 5D shows decision curve analysis containing different treatment strategies of the model according to some embodiments of the present invention (solid curve) and the baseline model (dashed curve). Strategies of treating all (dashed line), treating none (dotted line) and the perfect hypothetical predictor (dot-dash line) are also presented. Abbreviations: auPR/auROC—Area under the PR/ROC curve, PPV—positive predictive value, PR—Precision-Recall, ROC—Receiver-Operator-Characteristic

FIGS. 6A-C show discrimination performances of the obesity prediction model in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. The discrimination performances are represented by Precision-Recall (auPR) according to last measured WFL percentile (FIG. 6A), different subpopulations of children (FIG. 6B), and the child's age (0-24 months) (FIG. 6C). Abbreviations: auPR—Area under the PR curve, PR—Precision-Recall, WFL—weight for length.

FIGS. 7A-H show interpretation of the model of the present embodiments. FIG. 7A shows Shapley values of different groups of features. FIGS. 7B-H are plots showing in the lower part a histogram of the distribution of a feature in the data and in the upper part a dependence plot of the predicted relative risk for obesity at 5-6 years of age versus the value of the feature for child last WFL z-score (FIG. 7B), child birth weight (FIG. 7C), siblings mean BMI z-score (FIG. 7D), maternal and paternal mean BMI (FIG. 7E); maternal 50 g GCT results during pregnancy (FIG. 7F), duration of antibiotic therapy calculated by the summation of the days in which the child was issued an antibiotics treatment (FIG. 7G), and Child North African Ethnicity index (FIG. 7H). Abbreviations: GCT—glucose challenge test, WFL—Weight-for-Length, y/o—years old.

FIGS. 8A and 8B show results of applying the childhood obesity prediction model of the present embodiments prior to 2 years of age. FIG. 8A shows auPR curve for prediction models of obesity at 5-6 years of age based on features that were extracted up to a predefined endpoint age, ranging from pre-birth to 2 years of age of note, auPR of the prediction model pre-birth and at birth overlap. The baseline model was defined as last routine checkup WFL z-score. FIG. 8B shows relative importance of groups of features for the prediction models, calculated by normalizing to the sum of mean absolute SHAP values for each model. “Others” sums up non-anthropometric or demographic features such as laboratory tests and drug features. Abbreviations: auPR—Area under the PR curve, PR—Precision-Recall, WFL—weight for length

DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The present invention, in some embodiments thereof, relates to medicine and, more particularly, but not exclusively, to a method and system for predicting childhood obesity.

Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not necessarily limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components and/or methods set forth in the following description and/or illustrated in the drawings and/or the Examples. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways.

FIG. 1 is a flowchart diagram of a method suitable for predicting likelihood for childhood obesity, according to various exemplary embodiments of the present invention. It is to be understood that, unless otherwise defined, the operations described hereinbelow can be executed either contemporaneously or sequentially in many combinations or orders of execution. Specifically, the ordering of the flowchart diagrams is not to be considered as limiting. For example, two or more operations, appearing in the following description or in the flowchart diagrams in a particular order, can be executed in a different order (e.g., a reverse order) or substantially contemporaneously. Additionally, several operations described below are optional and may not be executed.

The processing operations of the present embodiments can be embodied in many forms. For example, they can be embodied in on a tangible medium such as a computer for performing the operations. They can be embodied on a computer readable medium, comprising computer readable instructions for carrying out the method operations. They can also be embodied in electronic device having digital computer capabilities arranged to run the computer program on the tangible medium or execute the instruction on a computer readable medium.

Computer programs implementing the method according to some embodiments of this invention can commonly be distributed to users on a distribution medium such as, but not limited to, CD-ROM, flash memory devices, flash drives, or, in some embodiments, drives accessible by means of network communication, over the internet (e.g., within a cloud environment), or over a cellular network. From the distribution medium, the computer programs can be copied to a hard disk or a similar intermediate storage medium. The computer programs can be run by loading the computer instructions either from their distribution medium or their intermediate storage medium into the execution memory of the computer, configuring the computer to act in accordance with the method of this invention. Computer programs implementing the method according to some embodiments of this invention can also be executed by one or more data processors that belong to a cloud computing environment. All these operations are well-known to those skilled in the art of computer systems. Data used and/or provided by the method of the present embodiments can be transmitted by means of network communication, over the internet, over a cellular network or over any type of network, suitable for data transmission.

The method according to preferred embodiments of the present invention can be embedded into healthcare systems and may allow identification and implementation of prevention strategies for children at high risk for obesity.

The method begins at 10 and continues to 11 at which a plurality of parameters characterizing is obtained. The inventors discovered that the likelihood for childhood obesity can be predicted both for infant or toddler subjects and for unborn subjects, e.g., during the pregnancy of a female carrying the unborn subject.

As used herein “infant” refers to an individual not more that 1 year of age, and “toddler” refers to an individual above 1 year of age and not more than 3 years of age”

Thus, in some embodiments of the present invention the method predicts likelihood that an infant or toddler subject is expected to develop childhood obesity, and in some embodiments of the present invention the method predicts unborn subject is expected to develop childhood obesity after birth. When the subject is an infant or toddler subject he or she is preferably of less than two years of age. The method of the present embodiments is typically used for estimating the likelihood that the subject is expected to develop childhood obesity at age greater than the toddler age, e.g., more than 4 years of age, for example, from about 5 to about 6 years of age.

When the subject is an infant or toddler subject, at least one of the parameters that are obtained at 11, more preferably more than one of these parameters, more preferably at least 10 or at least 20 or at least 30 or at least 40 or at least 50 or at least 100 or at least 200 or at least 300 or at least 400 or at least 500 or more of the parameters are extracted from an electronic health record associated with the subject. Parameters extracted from an electronic health record can include, but are not limited to, anthropometric parameters (e.g., height, weight, body mass index, weight-for-length score), blood pressure measurements, blood and urine laboratory tests, diagnoses recorded by physicians, and/or pharmaceuticals prescribed to the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention at least one of the parameters that are obtained at 11, more preferably more than one of these parameters, more preferably at least 10 or at least 20 or at least 30 or at least 40 or at least 50 or at least 100 or at least 200 or at least 300 or at least 400 or at least 500 or more of the parameters are extracted from an electronic health record associated with a parent (mother and/or father) and/or a sibling (brother and or sister) of the subject. These parameters can include any of the aforementioned parameters associated with the subject, except that they describe the respective parent or sibling (e.g., anthropometric parameters, blood pressure measurements, blood and urine laboratory tests, diagnoses, pharmaceuticals).

When the subject is an unborn subject, there are typically no parameters that describe the subject itself, and so the parameters that are obtained at 11 are typically associated with a parent (mother and/or father) and/or a sibling (brother and or sister) of the subject, as further detailed hereinabove.

A list of parameters from which the parameters can be selected when the subject is an infant or toddler subject is provided in Table 1.1 of the Examples section that follows, and list of parameters from which the parameters can be selected when the subject is an unborn subject is provided in Table 1.2 of the Examples section that follows. In some embodiments of the present invention at least 10 or at least 20 or at least 30 or at least 40 or at least 50 or at least 100 or at least 200 or at least 300 or at least 400 or at least 500 are selected from the parameters listed in Table 1.1 (for an infant or toddler subject) or Table 1.2 (for an unborn subject). Preferably, but not necessarily, at least 10 or at least 12 or at least 14 or at least 16 of the parameters are selected from the parameters that are listed at lines 1-40 more preferably lines 1-30 more preferably lines 1-20 of Table 1.1 (for an infant or toddler subject) or Table 1.2 (for an unborn subject). In some embodiments, at least 20 or at least 22 or at least 24 or at least 26 or at least 28 or at least 30 or at least 32 or at least 34 or at least 36 of the parameters are selected from the parameters that are listed at lines 1-50 more preferably lines 1-45 more preferably lines 1-40 of Table 1.1 (for an infant or toddler subject) or Table 1.2 (for an unborn subject). In some embodiments, at least 50 or at least 60 or at least 70 or at least 80 or at least 90 of the parameters are selected from the parameters that are listed at lines 1-300 more preferably lines 1-200 more preferably lines 1-100 of Table 1.1 (for an infant or toddler subject) or Table 1.2 (for an unborn subject).

Also contemplated are embodiments in which the parameters are selected from a set of response parameters that are provided by a person on behalf of the subject (e.g., a parent, a sibling, etc.), by responding to a questionnaire presented to the person. These parameters can include anthropometric parameters (e.g., height, weight, body mass index, weight-for-length score), one or more parameters indicative of the age of the subject (if born), and one or more parameters indicative of the ethnicity of the subject. A list of parameters which can be provided by responding to the questionnaire is provided in Table 1.3 for the case in which the subject is an infant or toddler subject, and in Table 1.4 for the case in which the subject is an unborn subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters include only parameters extracted from one or more electronic health records, in some embodiments of the present invention the parameters include only response parameters that are provided on behalf of the subject, and in some embodiments of the present invention the parameters include both parameters extracted from electronic health record(s) and response parameters that are provided by the subject or on her behalf.

In some embodiments of the present invention the electronic health record(s) include a record that is associated with the subject, in some embodiments of the present invention parameters the electronic health record(s) include records that are associated with at least one of a parent and a sibling of the subject, and in some embodiments of the present invention the electronic health record(s) include at least one record that is associated with the subject, and at least one record that is associated with a parent and/or a sibling of the subject.

The number of parameters that are extracted from the electronic health record(s) associated is preferably at least 10 or at least 20 or at least 30 or at least 40 or at least 50 or at least 100 or at least 200 or at least 300 or at least 400 or at least 500 or more. The number of response parameters that are provided by the subject or on her behalf is preferably 100 or less, or 80 or less, or 70 or less. The advantage of this embodiment is that a relative small number of parameter allows the subject to manually respond to the questionnaire at a relatively short time.

When the parameters include both parameters extracted from electronic health record(s), and response parameters that are provided on behalf of the subject, the number of parameters that are extracted from the electronic health record(s) is optionally and preferably significantly larger (e.g., at least 2 or at least 3 or at least 4 or at least 5 or at least 6 or at least 7 or at least 8 or at least 9 or at least 10 times larger) than the number of response parameters that are provided on behalf of the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention at least one of the parameters is extracted from a body liquid test applied to the infant or toddler subject. Representative examples of body liquid tests from which a parameter can extracted from a body liquid test applied to the infant or toddler subject according to some embodiments of the present invention include, without limitation, Albumin test, Alk. phosphatase test, Atypical lymph. %-dif test, Atypical lymph-dif test, Basophils percentage (Baso %) test, Basophils (Baso abs) test, Bilirubin total test, Bilirubin-direct test, Calcium test, Chloride test, Cholesterol test, C-reactive protein test, Creatinine test, Eos % test, Eos.abs test, Eosinophils abs-dif test, Eosinophils %-dif test, Ferritin test, Gamma glutamyl transferase (Ggt) test, Glucose test, Got (ast) test, Alanine aminotransferase (Gpt (alt)) test, hemoglobin concentration (Hb) test, Hematocrit (Hct) test, Hematocrit/hemoglobin (Hct/hgb) ratio test, Hyper % test, Hypochromic red cells (Hypo %) test, Iron test, Ldh test, Luc abs test, Luc % test, Lym % test, Lymp.abs test, Lymphocytes %-dif test, Lymphocytes abs-dif test, Macro % test, Mean cell hemoglobin (Mch) test, mean hemoglobin concentration (Mchc) test, mean corpuscular volume (Mcv) test, Micro % test, Micro %/hypo % test, Mono % test, Mono.abs test, Monocytes abs-dif test, Monocytes %-dif test, mean platelet volume (Mpv) test, Mpxi test, Neut % test, Neut.abs test, Neutrophils abs-dif test, Neutrophils %-dif test, Pct test, Pdw test, Phosphorus test, platelet count blood (Plt) test, Potassium test, Protein-total test, Rbc test, red cell distribution width (Rdw) test, Red blood cell distribution width presented as the coefficient of variation (Rdw-cv) test, Sodium test, Stabs %-dif test, Stabs abs-dif test, T4-free test, Transferrin test, Triglycerides test, Thyroid-stimulating hormone (Tsh) test, Urea test, Uric acid test, and white blood cells (Wbc) test.

In some embodiments of the present invention at least one of the parameters is extracted from a body liquid test applied to the mother of the infant or toddler subject during pregnancy of the mother with the infant or toddler subject. Representative examples of body liquid tests from which a parameter can extracted from a body liquid test applied to the mother according to some embodiments of the present invention include, without limitation, Albumin, Alk. phosphatase, Alpha fetoprotein tm, Amylase, Aptt-r, Aptt-sec, Baso %, Baso abs, Bilirubin indirect, Bilirubin total, Bilirubin-direct, Blood type, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol-hdl, Cholesterol, Cholesterol/hdl, Cholesterol-ldl calc, Ck-creat.kinase(cpk), Cmv igg, Control ptt, Creatinine, Dhea sulphate, Eos %, Eos.abs, Eosinophils abs-dif, Eosinophils %-dif, Esr, Estradiol (e-2), Ferritin, Fibrinogen calcu, Fibrinogen, Folic acid, Fsh, Ggt, Globulin, Glom.filtr.rate, Glucose (gtt) 0′, Glucose (gtt) 120′, Glucose (gtt) 180′, Glucose (gtt) 60′, Glucose 50 g, Glucose, Got (ast), Gpt (alt), Hb, Hba, Hba2, Hbf, Hct, Hct/hgb ratio, Hdw, Hemoglobin a, Hemoglobin alc %, Hepatitis bs ab, Hyper %, Hypo %, Iron, Ldh, Lh, Li, Luc abs, Luc %, Lym %, Lymp.abs, Lymphocytes %-dif, Lymphocytes abs-dif, Macro %, Magnesium, Mch, Mchc, Mcv, Micro %, Micro %/hypo %, Mono %, Mono.abs, Monocytes abs-dif, Monocytes %-dif, Mpv, Mpxi, Neut %, Neut.abs, Neutrophils abs-dif, Neutrophils %-dif, Non-hdl_cholesterol, Normoblast. %, Normoblast.abs, Pct, Pdw, Phosphorus, Plt, Potassium, Progesterone, Prolactin, Protein-total, Pt %, Pt-inr, Pt-sec, Rbc, Rdw, Rdw-cv, Rubella ab igg, Sodium, Stabs %-dif, Stabs abs-dif, T3-free, T4-free, Toxoplasma igg, Transferrin, Triglycerides, Tsh, Urea, Uric acid, Vitamin b12, Vitamin d (25-oh), and Wbc.

In some embodiments of the present invention at least one of the parameters is extracted from a test applied to the mother of the infant or toddler subject prior to the pregnancy of the mother with the infant or toddler subject. Representative examples such tests include, without limitation, 17-oh-progesterone, Albumin, Alk. phosphatase, Aly, Aly %, Amylase, Androstenedione, Anti cardiolipin igg, Anti cardiolipin igm, Antithrombin-iii, Aptt-r, Aptt-sec, Baso %, Baso abs, Bilirubin indirect, Bilirubin total, Bilirubin-direct, Blood type, BMI, Ca-125, Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol-hdl, Cholesterol, Cholesterol/hdl, Cholesterol-ldl calc, Ck-creat.kinase(cpk), Cmv igg, Complement c3, Complement c4, Control ptt, Cortisol-blood, C-reactive protein, Creatinine, Dhea sulphate, Eos %, Eos.abs, Eosinophils %-dif, Esr, Estradiol (e-2), Ferritin, Fibrinogen calcu, Fibrinogen, Folic acid, Free androgen index, Fsh, Ggt, Globulin, Glom.filtr.rate, Glucose 50 g, Glucose, Got (ast), Gpt (alt), Hb, Hba2, Hbf, Hct, Hct/hgb ratio, Hdw, Hemoglobin a, Hemoglobin alc %, Hepatitis bs ab, Hyper %, Hypo %, Iga, Iron, Ldh, Lh, Lic, Lic %, Luc abs, Luc %, Lym %, Lymp.abs, Lymphocytes %-dif, Lymphocytes abs-dif, Macro %, Magnesium, Mch, Mchc, Mcv, Micro %, Micro %/hypo %, Mono %, Mono.abs, Monocytes abs-dif, Monocytes %-dif, Mpv, Mpxi, Neut %, Neut.abs, Neutrophils abs-dif, Neutrophils %-dif, Non-hdl_cholesterol, Normoblast. %, Normoblast.abs, Pct, Pdw, Phosphorus, Plt, Potassium, Progesterone, Prolactin, Protein c activity, Protein-total, Prot-s antigen (free, Pt %, Pt-inr, Pt-sec, Rbc, Rdw, Rdw-cv, Rubella ab igg, Shbg, Sodium, T3-free, T3-total, T4-free, Testosterone-total, Toxoplasma igg, Transferrin, Triglycerides, Tsh, Urea, Uric acid, Vitamin b12, Vitamin d (25-oh), Vldl, Wbc, and Weight.

In some embodiments of the present invention the plurality of parameters comprises a result of a blood glucose test applied to the mother of the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention at least one of the parameters is extracted from a test applied to the father of the infant or toddler subject. Representative examples of such tests include, without limitation, Age at the birth of the subject, BMI count, BMI max, BMI mean, BMI median, BMI min, BMI standard deviation (std), Height count, Height max, Height mean, Height median, Height min, Height std, max Cholesterol-hdl, max Cholesterol, max Cholesterol/hdl, max Cholesterol-ldl calc, max Glucose, max Non-hdl_cholesterol, max Triglycerides, mean Cholesterol-hdl, mean Cholesterol, mean Cholesterol/hdl, mean Cholesterol-ldl calc, mean Glucose, mean Non-hdl_cholesterol, mean Triglycerides, median Cholesterol-hdl, median Cholesterol, median Cholesterol/hdl, median Cholesterol-ldl calc, median Glucose, median Non-hdl_cholesterol, median Triglycerides, min Cholesterol-hdl, min Cholesterol, min Cholesterol/hdl, min Cholesterol-ldl calc, min Glucose, min Non-hdl_cholesterol, min Triglycerides, std Cholesterol-hdl, std Cholesterol, std Cholesterol/hdl, std Cholesterol-ldl calc, std Glucose, std Non-hdl_cholesterol, std Triglycerides, Weight count, Weight max, Weight mean, Weight median, Weight min, and Weight std.

In some embodiments of the present invention one or more of the parameters is a result of a hemoglobin concentration test (Hb) applied to the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention one or more of the parameters is a result of a mean platelet volume test (Mpv) applied to the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention one or more of the parameters is a result of a Basophils percentage test (Baso %) applied to the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention one or more of the parameters is a result of a red cell distribution width test (Rdw) applied to the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention one or more of the parameters is a result of a platelet count blood test (plt) applied to the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters comprise at least one parameter extracted from a clinical or hospital diagnosis previously recorded for the subject. Representative examples of clinical and hospital diagnoses which can be used as parameters according to some embodiments of the present invention include, without limitation, Abdominal pain, Abnormal loss of weight, Abnormal weight gain, Accident/injury; nos, Acquired deformities of other parts of limbs, Acute and unspecified inflammation of lacrimal passages, Acute bronchiolitis, Acute bronchitis, Acute conjunctivitis, Acute laryngitis, Acute laryngotracheitis, Acute lymphadenitis, Acute myringitis without mention of otitis media, Acute nasopharyngitis (common cold), Acute nonsuppurative otitis media, Acute pharyngitis, Acute suppurative otitis media, Acute tonsillitis, Acute upper respiratory infections of multiple or unsp.sites, Acute upper respiratory infections of unspecified site, Agranulocytosis, Allergic rhinitis, Allergy, unspecified, not elsewhere classified, Allergy/allergic react nos, Anal fissure, Anemia other/unspecified, Anorexia, Asthma, Asthma, unspecified, Atopic dermatitis/eczema, Benign neoplasm of skin, site unspecified, Blepharitis, Blisters with epidermal loss,burn 2nd.deg.unspecified site, Bronchopneumonia, organism unspecified, Candidiasis of mouth, Candidiasis of skin and nails, Candidiasis of unspecified site, Cellulitis and abscess of finger, Cellulitis and abscess of unspecified sites, Chronic rhinitis, Chronic serous otitis media, Colitis, enteritis, gastroenteritis presumed infectious origin, Congenital anomalies of lower limb, including pelvic girdle, Congenital dislocation of hip, Congenital musculoskeletal deformities of sternocleidomastoid, Constipation, Contact dermatitis and other eczema, Contact dermatitis and other eczema, unspecified cause, Contusion of unspecified site, Convulsions, Cough, Croup, Delivery in a completely normal case, Dermatitis due to food taken internally, Dermatophytosis of the body, Diaper or napkin rash, Diarrhea, Diseases and other conditions of the tongue, Disorders relating to other preterm infants, Dyspnea and respiratory abnormalities, Enlargement of lymph nodes, Enteritis due to specified virus, Enterobiasis, Esophagitis, Feeding difficulties and mismanagement, Fever, Gastrointestinal hemorrhage, Hand, foot, and mouth disease, Hearing complaints, Hearing loss, Hemangioma of unspecified site, Herpangina, Hip symptoms/complaints, Hydrocele, Hydronephrosis, Hypermetropia, Hypertrophy of tonsils and adenoids, Impetigo, Infectious colitis, enteritis, and gastroenteritis, Infectious diarrhea, Infectious mononucleosis, Infective otitis externa, Influenza, Inguinal hernia, without mention of obstruction or gangrene, Injuries, Insect bite, Insect bite, nonvenomous face, neck, scalp without infection, Intestinal malabsorption, Iron deficiency anemia, unspecified, Irritable infant, Jaundice, unspecified, not of newborn, Laceration/cut, Lack of coordination, Lack of expected normal physiological development, Late effect of injury to cranial nerve, Laxity of ligament, Nausea and vomiting, Nervousness, Nonsuppurative otitis media, not specified as acute or chronic, Open wound of face, without mention of complication, Oral aphthae, Otalgia, Other and unspec.noninfectious gastroenteritis and colitis, Other and unspecified chronic nonsuppurative otitis media, Other and unspecified injury to unspecified site, Other atopic dermatitis and related conditions, Other diseases of conjunctiva due to viruses and chlamydiae, Other diseases of nasal cavity and sinuses, Other serum reaction, not elsewhere classified, Other specified disease of white blood cells, Other specified erythematous conditions, Other specified viral exanthemata, Other speech disturbance, Other symptoms involving digestive system, Other viral diseases; nos, Otorrhea, Pneumonia, Pneumonia, organism unspecified, Posttraumatic wound infection not elsewhere classified, Premat/immature liveborn infant, Rash and other nonspecific skin eruption, Seborrhea, Seborrheic dermatitis, unspecified, Serous otitis media;glue, Sleep disturbances, Sneezing/nasal congestion, Stenosis and insufficiency of lacrimal passages, Stomatitis, Strabismus and other disorders of binocular eye movements, Stridor, Teething syndrome, Tongue tie, Torticollis, unspecified, U.r.i. (head cold), Umbilical hernia without mention of obstruction or gangrene, Undescended testicle, Unsp.adv.effect of drug,medicinal/biological substance n.e.s., Unsp.viral infect.in conditions classif.elsewhere, unsp.site, Unspecified fetal and neonatal jaundice, Unspecified otitis media, Urinary tract infection, site not specified, Urticaria, Varicella without mention of complication, Viral exanthem, unspecified, Viral pneumonia, Volume depletion disorder, Vomiting (excl.preg. w06), and Wheezing baby syndrome.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters comprise at least one parameter indicative of a pharmaceutical prescribed for the subject. Representative examples of prescribed pharmaceuticals which can be used as parameters according to some embodiments of the present invention include, without limitation, Aciclovir, Ahiston drop cd, Amoxicillin, Azithromycin, Bethamethasone, Budesonide, Cefaclor, Cefalexin, Ceftriaxone, Cefuroxime, Co-amoxiclav cd, Co-trimoxazole cd, Desloratadine, Dimethindene, Erythromycin, Fluticasone, Ipratropium bromide, Ketotifen, Loratadine, Mebendazole, Metronidazole, Montelukast, Phenoxymethylpenicillin, Prednisolone, Prothiazine/promethazine expectorant cd, Ranitidine, Salbutamol, and Terbutaline.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters comprise at least one parameter indicative of a count of Salbutamol prescriptions provided for the infant or toddler subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters comprise at least one parameter indicative of a count of Bethamethasone prescriptions provided for the infant or toddler subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters comprise at least one parameter indicative of a count of Budesonide prescriptions provided for the infant or toddler subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters comprise at least one parameter indicative of a pharmaceutical prescribed for the mother of the subject. Representative examples of prescribed pharmaceuticals which can be used as parameters according to some embodiments of the present invention include, without limitation, Aciclovir, Amoxicillin, Anti-d (rh) immunoglobulin, Aspirin, Bethamethasone, Budesonide, Cabergoline, Carbamazepine, Cefalexin, Cefuroxime, Cetirizine, Choriogonadotropin alfa, Chorionic gonadotrophin, Ciprofloxacin, Citalopram, Clarithromycin, Clomifene, Clonazepam, Co-amoxiclav cd, Colchicine, Desloratadine, Desogestrel and ethinylestradiol, Desogestrel, Dexamethasone, Doxycycline, Drospirenone and ethinylestradiol, Dydrogesterone, Enoxaparin, Escitalopram, Estradiol, Famotidine, Fexofenadine, Fluconazole, Fluoxetine, Fluticasone, Follitropin alfa, Follitropin beta, Gestodene and ethinylestradiol, Human menopausal gonadotrophin, Ipratropium bromide, Lamotrigine, Lansoprazole, Levothyroxine sodium, Loratadine, Mebendazole, Medroxyprogesterone, Methylphenidate, Metronidazole, Nitrofurantoin, Norethisterone, Norgestimate and ethinylestradiol, Ofloxacin, Omeprazole, Paroxetine, Phenoxymethylpenicillin, Prednisone, Progesterone, Progyluton cd, Roxithromycin, Salbutamol, Seretide cd, Sertraline, Simvastatin, Symbicort/duoresp, and Triptorelin.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters comprise at least one parameter indicative of a pharmaceutical prescribed for the father of the subject. Representative examples of prescribed pharmaceuticals which can be used as parameters according to some embodiments of the present invention include, without limitation, Amlodipine, Atenolol, Atorvastatin, Bezafibrate, Bisoprolol, Cholesterol-hdl, Cholesterol, Cholesterol/hdl, Cholesterol-ldl calc, Enalapril, Glucose, Insulin glargine, Metformin and sitagliptin cd, Metformin, Nifedipine, Nifedipine-cd, Non-hdl_cholesterol, Pravastatin, Propranolol, Ramipril, Ramipril-hydrochlorothiazide cd, Rosuvastatin, Simvastatin, and Triglycerides.

In some embodiments of the present invention the parameters comprise at least one parameter extracted from a clinical or hospital diagnosis previously recorded for the father of subject. Representative examples of clinical and hospital diagnoses which can be used as parameters according to some embodiments of the present invention include, without limitation, Diabetes mellitus, unspecified Obesity, Obesity (BMI>30), other and unspecified hyperlipidemia, Essential hypertension, Morbid obesity, unspecified essential hypertension, Overweight (BMI<30), other abnormal glucose, Lipid metabolism disorder, Impaired fasting glucose, Disorders of lipoid metabolism, Diabetes mellitus without mention of complication, and Adult-onset type diabetes mellitus without complication.

Referring again to FIG. 1, the method proceeds to 12 at which a computer readable medium storing a machine learning procedure is accessed. The machine learning procedure is trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity.

As used herein the term “machine learning” refers to a procedure embodied as a computer program configured to induce patterns, regularities, or rules from previously collected data to develop an appropriate response to future data, or describe the data in some meaningful way.

Representative examples of machine learning procedures suitable for the present embodiments, include, without limitation, clustering, association rule algorithms, feature evaluation algorithms, subset selection algorithms, support vector machines, classification rules, cost-sensitive classifiers, vote algorithms, stacking algorithms, Bayesian networks, decision trees, neural networks, instance-based algorithms, linear modeling algorithms, k-nearest neighbors (KNN) analysis, ensemble learning algorithms, probabilistic models, graphical models, logistic regression methods (including multinomial logistic regression methods), gradient ascent methods, singular value decomposition methods and principle component analysis.

Following is an overview of some machine learning procedures suitable for the present embodiments.

Support vector machines are algorithms that are based on statistical learning theory. A support vector machine (SVM) according to some embodiments of the present invention can be used for classification purposes and/or for numeric prediction. A support vector machine for classification is referred to herein as “support vector classifier,” support vector machine for numeric prediction is referred to herein as “support vector regression”.

An SVM is typically characterized by a kernel function, the selection of which determines whether the resulting SVM provides classification, regression or other functions. Through application of the kernel function, the SVM maps input vectors into high dimensional feature space, in which a decision hyper-surface (also known as a separator) can be constructed to provide classification, regression or other decision functions. In the simplest case, the surface is a hyper-plane (also known as linear separator), but more complex separators are also contemplated and can be applied using kernel functions. The data points that define the hyper-surface are referred to as support vectors.

The support vector classifier selects a separator where the distance of the separator from the closest data points is as large as possible, thereby separating feature vector points associated with objects in a given class from feature vector points associated with objects outside the class. For support vector regression, a high-dimensional tube with a radius of acceptable error is constructed which minimizes the error of the data set while also maximizing the flatness of the associated curve or function. In other words, the tube is an envelope around the fit curve, defined by a collection of data points nearest the curve or surface.

An advantage of a support vector machine is that once the support vectors have been identified, the remaining observations can be removed from the calculations, thus greatly reducing the computational complexity of the problem. An SVM typically operates in two phases: a training phase and a testing phase. During the training phase, a set of support vectors is generated for use in executing the decision rule. During the testing phase, decisions are made using the decision rule. A support vector algorithm is a method for training an SVM. By execution of the algorithm, a training set of parameters is generated, including the support vectors that characterize the SVM. A representative example of a support vector algorithm suitable for the present embodiments includes, without limitation, sequential minimal optimization.

In KNN analysis, the affinity or closeness of objects is determined. The affinity is also known as distance in a feature space between objects. Based on the determined distances, the objects are clustered and an outlier is detected. Thus, the KNN analysis is a technique to find distance-based outliers based on the distance of an object from its kth-nearest neighbors in the feature space. Specifically, each object is ranked on the basis of its distance to its kth-nearest neighbors. The farthest away object is declared the outlier. In some cases the farthest objects are declared outliers. That is, an object is an outlier with respect to parameters, such as, a k number of neighbors and a specified distance, if no more than k objects are at the specified distance or less from the object. The KNN analysis is a classification technique that uses supervised learning. An item is presented and compared to a training set with two or more classes. The item is assigned to the class that is most common amongst its k-nearest neighbors. That is, compute the distance to all the items in the training set to find the k nearest, and extract the majority class from the k and assign to item.

Association rule algorithm is a technique for extracting meaningful association patterns among features.

The term “association”, in the context of machine learning, refers to any interrelation among features, not just ones that predict a particular class or numeric value. Association includes, but it is not limited to, finding association rules, finding patterns, performing feature evaluation, performing feature subset selection, developing predictive models, and understanding interactions between features.

The term “association rules” refers to elements that co-occur frequently within the datasets. It includes, but is not limited to association patterns, discriminative patterns, frequent patterns, closed patterns, and colossal patterns.

A usual primary step of association rule algorithm is to find a set of items or features that are most frequent among all the observations. Once the list is obtained, rules can be extracted from them.

The aforementioned self-organizing map is an unsupervised learning technique often used for visualization and analysis of high-dimensional data. Typical applications are focused on the visualization of the central dependencies within the data on the map. The map generated by the algorithm can be used to speed up the identification of association rules by other algorithms. The algorithm typically includes a grid of processing units, referred to as “neurons”. Each neuron is associated with a feature vector referred to as observation. The map attempts to represent all the available observations with optimal accuracy using a restricted set of models. At the same time the models become ordered on the grid so that similar models are close to each other and dissimilar models far from each other. This procedure enables the identification as well as the visualization of dependencies or associations between the features in the data.

Feature evaluation algorithms are directed to the ranking of features or to the ranking followed by the selection of features based on their impact.

Information gain is one of the machine learning methods suitable for feature evaluation. The definition of information gain requires the definition of entropy, which is a measure of impurity in a collection of training instances. The reduction in entropy of the target feature that occurs by knowing the values of a certain feature is called information gain. Information gain may be used as a parameter to determine the effectiveness of a feature in explaining the response to the treatment. Symmetrical uncertainty is an algorithm that can be used by a feature selection algorithm, according to some embodiments of the present invention. Symmetrical uncertainty compensates for information gain's bias towards features with more values by normalizing features to a [0,1] range.

Subset selection algorithms rely on a combination of an evaluation algorithm and a search algorithm. Similarly to feature evaluation algorithms, subset selection algorithms rank subsets of features. Unlike feature evaluation algorithms, however, a subset selection algorithm suitable for the present embodiments aims at selecting the subset of features with the highest impact on predicting likelihood for childhood obesity, while accounting for the degree of redundancy between the features included in the subset. The benefits from feature subset selection include facilitating data visualization and understanding, reducing measurement and storage requirements, reducing training and utilization times, and eliminating distracting features to improve classification.

Two basic approaches to subset selection algorithms are the process of adding features to a working subset (forward selection) and deleting from the current subset of features (backward elimination). In machine learning, forward selection is done differently than the statistical procedure with the same name. The feature to be added to the current subset in machine learning is found by evaluating the performance of the current subset augmented by one new feature using cross-validation. In forward selection, subsets are built up by adding each remaining feature in turn to the current subset while evaluating the expected performance of each new subset using cross-validation. The feature that leads to the best performance when added to the current subset is retained and the process continues. The search ends when none of the remaining available features improves the predictive ability of the current subset. This process finds a local optimum set of features.

Backward elimination is implemented in a similar fashion. With backward elimination, the search ends when further reduction in the feature set does not improve the predictive ability of the subset. The present embodiments contemplate search algorithms that search forward, backward or in both directions. Representative examples of search algorithms suitable for the present embodiments include, without limitation, exhaustive search, greedy hill-climbing, random perturbations of subsets, wrapper algorithms, probabilistic race search, schemata search, rank race search, and Bayesian classifier.

A decision tree is a decision support algorithm that forms a logical pathway of steps involved in considering the input to make a decision.

The term “decision tree” refers to any type of tree-based learning algorithms, including, but not limited to, model trees, classification trees, and regression trees.

A decision tree can be used to classify the datasets or their relation hierarchically. The decision tree has tree structure that includes branch nodes and leaf nodes. Each branch node specifies an attribute (splitting attribute) and a test (splitting test) to be carried out on the value of the splitting attribute, and branches out to other nodes for all possible outcomes of the splitting test. The branch node that is the root of the decision tree is called the root node. Each leaf node can represent a classification (e.g., whether a particular parameter influences on the likelihood for childhood obesity) or a value (e.g., the predicted likelihood for childhood obesity). The leaf nodes can also contain additional information about the represented classification such as a confidence score that measures a confidence level in the represented classification (i.e., the accuracy of the prediction).

Regression techniques which may be used in accordance with some embodiments the present invention include, but are not limited to linear Regression, Multiple Regression, logistic regression, probit regression, ordinal logistic regression ordinal Probit-Regression, Poisson Regression, negative binomial Regression, multinomial logistic Regression (MLR) and truncated regression.

A logistic regression or logit regression is a type of regression analysis used for predicting the outcome of a categorical dependent variable (a dependent variable that can take on a limited number of values, whose magnitudes are not meaningful but whose ordering of magnitudes may or may not be meaningful) based on one or more predictor variables. Logistic regression may also predict the probability of occurrence for each data point. Logistic regressions also include a multinomial variant. The multinomial logistic regression model is a regression model which generalizes logistic regression by allowing more than two discrete outcomes. That is, it is a model that is used to predict the probabilities of the different possible outcomes of a categorically distributed dependent variable, given a set of independent variables (which may be real-valued, binary-valued, categorical-valued, etc.). For binary-valued variables, a cutoff between the 0 and 1 associations is typically determined using the Yuden Index.

A Bayesian network is a model that represents variables and conditional interdependencies between variables. In a Bayesian network variables are represented as nodes, and nodes may be connected to one another by one or more links. A link indicates a relationship between two nodes. Nodes typically have corresponding conditional probability tables that are used to determine the probability of a state of a node given the state of other nodes to which the node is connected. In some embodiments, a Bayes optimal classifier algorithm is employed to apply the maximum a posteriori hypothesis to a new record in order to predict the probability of its classification, as well as to calculate the probabilities from each of the other hypotheses obtained from a training set and to use these probabilities as weighting factors for future predictions of the likelihood for childhood obesity. An algorithm suitable for a search for the best Bayesian network, includes, without limitation, global score metric-based algorithm. In an alternative approach to building the network, Markov blanket can be employed. The Markov blanket isolates a node from being affected by any node outside its boundary, which is composed of the node's parents, its children, and the parents of its children.

Instance-based techniques generate a new model for each instance, instead of basing predictions on trees or networks generated (once) from a training set.

The term “instance”, in the context of machine learning, refers to an example from a dataset.

Instance-based techniques typically store the entire dataset in memory and build a model from a set of records similar to those being tested. This similarity can be evaluated, for example, through nearest-neighbor or locally weighted methods, e.g., using Euclidian distances. Once a set of records is selected, the final model may be built using several different techniques, such as the naive Bayes.

Neural networks are a class of algorithms based on a concept of inter-connected “neurons.” In a typical neural network, neurons contain data values, each of which affects the value of a connected neuron according to connections with predefined strengths, and whether the sum of connections to each particular neuron meets a predefined threshold. By determining proper connection strengths and threshold values (a process also referred to as training), a neural network can achieve efficient recognition of images and characters. Oftentimes, these neurons are grouped into layers in order to make connections between groups more obvious and to each computation of values. Each layer of the network may have differing numbers of neurons, and these may or may not be related to particular qualities of the input data.

In one implementation, called a fully-connected neural network, each of the neurons in a particular layer is connected to and provides input value to those in the next layer. These input values are then summed and this sum compared to a bias, or threshold. If the value exceeds the threshold for a particular neuron, that neuron then holds a positive value which can be used as input to neurons in the next layer of neurons. This computation continues through the various layers of the neural network, until it reaches a final layer. At this point, the output of the neural network routine can be read from the values in the final layer. Unlike fully-connected neural networks, convolutional neural networks operate by associating an array of values with each neuron, rather than a single value. The transformation of a neuron value for the subsequent layer is generalized from multiplication to convolution.

The machine learning procedure used according to some embodiments of the present invention is a trained machine learning procedure, which provides output that is related non-linearly to the parameters with which it is fed.

A machine learning procedure can be trained according to some embodiments of the present invention by feeding a machine learning training program with parameters that characterizes each of a cohort of subjects that has been diagnosed as either having or not having childhood obesity at obesity at age greater than the toddler age. Once the data are fed, the machine learning training program generates a trained machine learning procedure which can then be used without the need to re-train it.

For example, when it is desired to employ decision trees, machine learning training program learns the structure of each tree in a plurality of decision trees (e.g., how many nodes there are in each tree, and how these are connected to one another), and also selects the decision rules for split nodes of each tree. At least a portion of the decision rules relate to one or more of the parameters that characterize the subject. A simple decision rule may be a threshold for the value of a particular parameter, but more complex rules, relating to more than one parameter are also contemplated. The machine learning training program also accumulates data at the leaves of the trees. The structures of the trees, the decision rules for the split nodes, and the data at the leaves are all selected by the machine learning training program, automatically and typically without user intervention, such that the parameters at the root of the trees provide the likelihood for childhood obesity at the leaves of the trees. The final result of the machine learning training program in this case is a set of trees, where the structures, the decision rules for split nodes, and leaf data for each trees are defined by the machine learning training program.

The method proceeds to 13 at which the trained machine learning procedure is fed with the parameters, and to 14 at which an output indicative of the likelihood that the subject is expected to develop childhood obesity is received from the procedure. Preferably, the procedure provides the likelihood that the subject is expected to develop childhood obesity at an age greater than the toddler are, as further detailed hereinabove. In some embodiments of the present invention the method proceeds to 15 at which a report predating to the likelihood is generated. The report can be displayed on a display device or transmitted to a computer readable medium.

The method ends at 16.

The prediction of likelihood for childhood obesity can be executed according to some embodiments of the present invention by a server-client configuration, as will now be explained with reference to FIG. 2.

FIG. 2 illustrates a client computer 30 having a hardware processor 32, which typically comprises an input/output (I/O) circuit 34, a hardware central processing unit (CPU) 36 (e.g., a hardware microprocessor), and a hardware memory 38 which typically includes both volatile memory and non-volatile memory. CPU 36 is in communication with I/O circuit 34 and memory 38. Client computer 30 preferably comprises a user interface, e.g., a graphical user interface (GUI), 42 in communication with processor 32. I/O circuit 34 preferably communicates information in appropriately structured form to and from GUI 42. Also shown is a server computer 50 which can similarly include a hardware processor 52, an I/O circuit 54, a hardware CPU 56, a hardware memory 58. I/O circuits 34 and 54 of client 30 and server 50 computers preferable operate as transceivers that communicate information with each other via a wired or wireless communication. For example, client 30 and server 50 computers can communicate via a network 40, such as a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN) or the Internet. Server computer 50 can be in some embodiments be a part of a cloud computing resource of a cloud computing facility in communication with client computer 30 over the network 40.

GUI 42 and processor 32 can be integrated together within the same housing or they can be separate units communicating with each other. GUI 42 can optionally and preferably be part of a system including a dedicated CPU and I/O circuits (not shown) to allow GUI 42 to communicate with processor 32. Processor 32 issues to GUI 42 graphical and textual output generated by CPU 36. Processor 32 also receives from GUI 42 signals pertaining to control commands generated by GUI 42 in response to user input. GUI 42 can be of any type known in the art, such as, but not limited to, a keyboard and a display, a touch screen, and the like. In preferred embodiments, GUI 42 is a GUI of a mobile device such as a smartphone, a tablet, a smartwatch and the like. When GUI 42 is a GUI of a mobile device, the CPU circuit of the mobile device can serve as processor 32 and can execute the method optionally and preferably by executing code instructions.

Client 30 and server 50 computers can further comprise one or more computer-readable storage media 44, 64, respectively. Media 44 and 64 are preferably non-transitory storage media storing computer code instructions for executing the method of the present embodiments, and processors 32 and 52 execute these code instructions. The code instructions can be run by loading the respective code instructions into the respective execution memories 38 and 58 of the respective processors 32 and 52. Storage media 64 preferably also store one or more databases including a database of psychologically annotated olfactory perception signatures as further detailed hereinabove.

In operation, processor 32 of client computer 30 displays on GUI 42 a questionnaire and a set of questionnaire controls, such as, but not limited to, a slider, a dropdown menu, a combo box, a text box and the like. A representative example of a displayed questionnaire 60 and a set of controls 62 is shown in FIG. 6C. A person on behalf of the subject can enter response parameters using the questionnaire controls displayed on GUI 42.

Processor 32 receives the response parameters from GUI 42 and typically transmits these parameters to server computer 50 over network 40. Media 64 can store a machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity. Server computer 50 can access media 64, feed the stored procedure with the parameters received from client computer 30, and receive from the procedure an output indicative of the likelihood that the subject that is characterized by the parameters is expected to develop childhood obesity. Server computer 50 can also transmit to client computer 30 the obtained likelihood, and client computer 30 can display this information on GUI 42.

As used herein the term “about” refers to ±10%.

The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance or illustration.” Any embodiment described as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments and/or to exclude the incorporation of features from other embodiments.

The word “optionally” is used herein to mean “is provided in some embodiments and not provided in other embodiments.” Any particular embodiment of the invention may include a plurality of “optional” features unless such features conflict.

The terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “includes”, “including”, “having” and their conjugates mean “including but not limited to”.

The term “consisting of” means “including and limited to”.

The term “consisting essentially of” means that the composition, method or structure may include additional ingredients, steps and/or parts, but only if the additional ingredients, steps and/or parts do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition, method or structure.

As used herein, the singular form “a”, “an” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, the term “a compound” or “at least one compound” may include a plurality of compounds, including mixtures thereof.

Throughout this application, various embodiments of this invention may be presented in a range format. It should be understood that the description in range format is merely for convenience and brevity and should not be construed as an inflexible limitation on the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the description of a range should be considered to have specifically disclosed all the possible subranges as well as individual numerical values within that range. For example, description of a range such as from 1 to 6 should be considered to have specifically disclosed subranges such as from 1 to 3, from 1 to 4, from 1 to 5, from 2 to 4, from 2 to 6, from 3 to 6 etc., as well as individual numbers within that range, for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. This applies regardless of the breadth of the range.

Whenever a numerical range is indicated herein, it is meant to include any cited numeral (fractional or integral) within the indicated range. The phrases “ranging/ranges between” a first indicate number and a second indicate number and “ranging/ranges from” a first indicate number “to” a second indicate number are used herein interchangeably and are meant to include the first and second indicated numbers and all the fractional and integral numerals therebetween.

As used herein the term “method” refers to manners, means, techniques and procedures for accomplishing a given task including, but not limited to, those manners, means, techniques and procedures either known to, or readily developed from known manners, means, techniques and procedures by practitioners of the chemical, pharmacological, biological, biochemical and medical arts.

As used herein, the term “treating” includes abrogating, substantially inhibiting, slowing or reversing the progression of a condition, substantially ameliorating clinical or aesthetical symptoms of a condition or substantially preventing the appearance of clinical or aesthetical symptoms of a condition.

It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination or as suitable in any other described embodiment of the invention. Certain features described in the context of various embodiments are not to be considered essential features of those embodiments, unless the embodiment is inoperative without those elements.

Various embodiments and aspects of the present invention as delineated hereinabove and as claimed in the claims section below find experimental support in the following examples.

EXAMPLES

Reference is now made to the following examples, which together with the above descriptions illustrate some embodiments of the invention in a non limiting fashion.

Example 1

Table 1.1 presents a list of 945 parameters from which parameters for feeing the machine learning procedure can be selected when the subject is an infant or toddler subject. The list is sorted according the significance of the respective feature for predicting the likelihood for childhood obesity, in descending order, so that from the standpoint of prediction accuracy it is more preferred to select a parameter that is listed higher in Table 1.1, than a parameter that is listed lower in Table 1.1. For example, when N parameters are used, it is preferred to select those parameters from lines 1 through M of Table 1.1, where N≤M≤945.

TABLE 1.1
No. Parameter
1 Last WFL zscore
2 Weight Routine checkup - 18-22 months
3 Weight Routine checkup - 12-16 months
4 WFL zscore median
5 Siblings median BMI zscore mean
6 WFL zscore mean
7 Weight Routine checkup - 4-6 months
8 Ethnicity: North Africa
9 Siblings mean BMI zscore mean
10 Siblings max BMI zscore mean
11 Father BMI median
12 WFL Routine checkup - 18-22 months
13 WFL zscore max
14 Father BMI max
15 Child mean Hb
16 Siblings at 5 years of age BMI zscore mean
17 Siblings min BMI zscore mean
18 Father BMI mean
19 Child mean Mpv
20 Father BMI min
21 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI max
22 Child All Antibiotics prescription day counts
23 Weight Routine checkup - 9-12 months
24 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI median
25 Child diagnosed Acute upper respiratory infections of multiple or
unsp.sites
26 Mother 24-40 weeks MCV
27 Height Routine checkup - 12-16 months
28 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI mean
29 Child mean Baso %
30 Mother 24-40 weeks MCH
31 Child mean Rdw
32 Child mean Plt
33 Child count Salbutamol
34 Height Routine checkup - 18-22 months
35 Weight Routine checkup - 6-9 months
36 Age of Father at birth
37 Child mean Eosinophils abs-dif
38 Siblings count BMI zscore std
39 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI min
40 WFL Routine checkup - 1-2 months
41 Ethnicity: Ethiopia
42 Weight Routine checkup - 2-3 months
43 Child mean Mcv
44 Child count Bethamethasone
45 Mother last BMI 24-40 weeks
46 Age of Mother at birth
47 WFL Routine checkup - 9-12 months
48 WFL zscore slope
49 Father Weight median
50 WFL Routine checkup - 12-16 months
51 Locality type: Jewish Locality 100,000-199,999 residents
52 Age at last WFL
53 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight max
54 Ethnicity: Unknown
55 Weight Routine checkup - 1-2 months
56 Mother last BMI 0-12 weeks
57 WFL zscore intercept
58 Height Routine checkup - 4-6 months
59 Child diagnosed Nausea and vomiting
60 Ethnicity: North America
61 Father Height median
62 Height Routine checkup - 6-9 months
63 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight mean
64 Ethnicity: West Europe
65 Child mean Hct
66 Locality type: Non-Jewish Locality 5,000-9,999 residents
67 Child mean Ggt
68 Mother 12-24 weeks VITAMIN B12
69 Child diagnosed Dyspnea and respiratory abnormalities
70 Mother 0-12 weeks MCH
71 Child mean Mch
72 Father std Cholesterol
73 Child mean Wbc
74 Child diagnosed Colitis, enteritis, gastroenteritis presumed
infectious origin
75 Child diagnosed Acute upper respiratory infections of unspecified
site
76 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight median
77 Siblings min BMI zscore std
78 Child mean Protein-total
79 Week of year born
80 Child mean Hypo %
81 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight min
82 WFL zscore min
83 Child diagnosed Hypertrophy of tonsils and adenoids
84 Mother Pre-pregnancy CMV IgG
85 Mother Pre-pregnancy PDW
86 Child diagnosed Acute tonsillitis
87 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE 50 g
88 Mother Pre-pregnancy GGT
89 Child mean Gpt (alt)
90 Child mean Albumin
91 Child diagnosed Fever
92 Child mean Ferritin
93 Father Height mean
94 Height Routine checkup - 9-12 months
95 Ethnicity: Iraq
96 Siblings mean BMI zscore std
97 Child count Budesonide
98 Father max Triglycerides
99 Mother 12-24 weeks RBC
100 Mother 0-12 weeks WBC
101 Siblings std BMI zscore mean
102 Mother last Diastolic Blood Pressure 24-40 weeks
103 Mother 12-24 weeks HB
104 Mother 12-24 weeks LUC %
105 Child Penicillin Antibiotics prescription day counts
106 Child mean Ldh
107 Mother 0-12 weeks VITAMIN B12
108 Child diagnosed Lack of coordination
109 Mother 0-12 weeks HCT
110 Mother Pre-pregnancy GLUCOSE 50 g
111 Father mean Cholesterol- hdl
112 Father mean Triglycerides
113 Father Height min
114 Child mean Tsh
115 Siblings count BMI zscore mean
116 Mother 0-12 weeks LYMP.abs
117 Child mean Rdw-cv
118 WFL Routine checkup - 6-9 months
119 Locality type: Non-Jewish Locality 10,000-19,999 residents
120 Mother Pre-pregnancy GLUCOSE
121 Child diagnosed Acute bronchiolitis
122 Mother last BMI 12-24 weeks
123 Father std Glucose
124 Mother Pre-pregnancy CK—CREAT.KINASE(CPK)
125 Child mean Creatinine
126 Father std Cholesterol-ldl calc
127 Father min Cholesterol- hdl
128 Mother last BMI Pre-pregnancy
129 Mother Pre-pregnancy TSH
130 Date of Birth
131 Mother last Weight Pre-pregnancy
132 Mother Pre-pregnancy MCHC
133 Mother Pre-pregnancy LYMP.abs
134 Siblings median BMI zscore std
135 Mother 12-24 weeks IRON
136 Mother count Roxithromycin
137 Mother last Weight 12-24 weeks
138 Mother 24-40 weeks MPV
139 Mother 12-24 weeks GLUCOSE
140 Mother Pre-pregnancy PT %
141 Height Routine checkup - 2-3 months
142 Mother 24-40 weeks VITAMIN B12
143 Father max Glucose
144 Father Weight max
145 Mother 24-40 weeks EOS %
146 Child diagnosed Cough
147 Child count Amoxicillin
148 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE (GTT) 0′
149 Mother Pre-pregnancy HCT
150 Mother Pre-pregnancy BILIRUBIN-DIRECT
151 Age at Target measurement
152 Mother 0-12 weeks MPV
153 Ethnicity: East Europe
154 Siblings max BMI zscore std
155 Child mean Glucose
156 Child mean Stabs %-dif
157 Height Routine checkup - 1-2 months
158 Father mean Glucose
159 Child mean Mono %
160 Mother 0-12 weeks NEUT.abs
161 Child mean Neutrophils abs-dif
162 Father Weight mean
163 Mother Pre-pregnancy T4- FREE
164 WFL zscore slope_std_err
165 Mother 24-40 weeks RBC
166 Mother Pre-pregnancy LYM %
167 Child diagnosed Hearing loss
168 Child mean Eos.abs
169 Child mean Sodium
170 Mother 24-40 weeks ALK. PHOSPHATASE
171 Child diagnosed Urinary tract infection, site not specified
172 Child mean Luc abs
173 Mother 0-12 weeks EOS.abs
174 Father min Triglycerides
175 Mother 0-12 weeks MONO.abs
176 Child mean Luc %
177 Mother Pre-pregnancy MPV
178 Mother Pre-pregnancy NEUT %
179 Mother 24-40 weeks APTT-R
180 Child diagnosed Otorrhea
181 Siblings at 13 years of age BMI zscore mean
182 Ethnicity: Muslim Arab
183 Child mean Atypical lymph.%-dif
184 Mother Pre-pregnancy PHOSPHORUS
185 WFL Routine checkup - 2-3 months
186 Father count Metformin
187 WFL zscore count
188 Child mean T4- free
189 Mother Pre-pregnancy NEUT.abs
190 Mother 12-24 weeks MCHC
191 Child mean Chloride
192 Mother 24-40 weeks HEMOGLOBIN A1C %
193 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHOLESTEROL-LDL calc
194 Child mean Lym %
195 Child mean Mono.abs
196 Child diagnosed Sleep disturbances
197 Child mean Micro %
198 Child mean Calcium
199 Child mean Rbc
200 Mother last Systolic Blood Pressure 0-12 weeks
201 Child mean Lymphocytes abs-dif
202 WFL Routine checkup - 4-6 months
203 Father median Triglycerides
204 Mother 24-40 weeks MICRO %
205 Mother last Systolic Blood Pressure 12-24 weeks
206 Mother 24-40 weeks MONO.abs
207 Mother 12-24 weeks PLT
208 Locality type: Jewish Locality 10,000-19,999 residents
209 Child mean Alk. phosphatase
210 Child mean Baso abs
211 Child mean Eos %
212 Mother Pre-pregnancy LDH
213 Child mean Atypical lymph-dif
214 Mother 0-12 weeks HEPATITIS Bs Ab
215 Child mean Hyper %
216 Child mean Got (ast)
217 Mother Pre-pregnancy PLT
218 Father min Glucose
219 Child mean Lymp.abs
220 Father max Non-hdl_cholesterol
221 Mother 12-24 weeks NEUT %
222 Mother 24-40 weeks HYPO %
223 Mother last Systolic Blood Pressure Pre-pregnancy
224 Father Height max
225 Mother last Systolic Blood Pressure 24-40 weeks
226 Father median Cholesterol- hdl
227 Mother 12-24 weeks T4- FREE
228 Mother Pre-pregnancy UREA
229 Mother Pre-pregnancy MAGNESIUM
230 Mother 0-12 weeks CHOLESTEROL/HDL
231 Child mean Mchc
232 Mother 24-40 weeks LYM %
233 Mother 12-24 weeks MCV
234 Mother Pre-pregnancy MONO.abs
235 Child mean Neut.abs
236 Mother Pre-pregnancy WBC
237 Mother 12-24 weeks MONO.abs
238 Mother 24-40 weeks HCT
239 Mother 0-12 weeks CMV IgG
240 Mother 24-40 weeks PLT
241 WFL zscore std
242 Birth weight
243 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROTEIN-TOTAL
244 Mother 12-24 weeks CMV IgG
245 Child mean Cholesterol
246 Mother 24-40 weeks CMV IgG
247 Mother 0-12 weeks SODIUM
248 Mother 24-40 weeks NEUT %
249 Mother 24-40 weeks MCHC
250 Father Weight min
251 Mother count Amoxicillin
252 Father mean Cholesterol
253 Child mean Bilirubin total
254 Father median Glucose
255 Child mean Pdw
256 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHOLESTEROL
257 Child Macrolides Antibiotics prescription day counts
258 Mother 0-12 weeks MONO %
259 Mother 24-40 weeks LYMP.abs
260 Mother 12-24 weeks NEUT.abs
261 Mother Pre-pregnancy HYPER %
262 Child mean Iron
263 Mother 12-24 weeks TSH
264 Mother count Cabergoline
265 Mother last Weight 0-12 weeks
266 Mother Pre-pregnancy PCT
267 Father Height std
268 Mother 0-12 weeks TRIGLYCERIDES
269 Mother 0-12 weeks GLUCOSE
270 Father std Cholesterol/hdl
271 Mother Pre-pregnancy HYPO %
272 Mother 24-40 weeks FERRITIN
273 Child count Terbutaline
274 Child mean Monocytes %-dif
275 Jewish Locality
276 Child mean Uric acid
277 Child diagnosed Acute nonsuppurative otitis media
278 Father BMI std
279 Mother Pre-pregnancy BASO %
280 Mother 24-40 weeks SODIUM
281 Mother Pre-pregnancy VITAMIN B12
282 Mother 0-12 weeks ESTRADIOL (E-2)
283 Mother 0-12 weeks LYM %
284 Mother 12-24 weeks EOS %
285 Mother 24-40 weeks NEUT.abs
286 Mother 24-40 weeks NEUTROPHILS abs-DIF
287 Father diagnosed Diabetes mellitus
288 Mother Pre-pregnancy CREATININE
289 Child Cephalosporin Antibiotics prescription day counts
290 Father Weight std
291 Mother 24-40 weeks HB
292 Mother BMI delta 12-24 weeks to 24-40 weeks
293 Mother 0-12 weeks GGT
294 Child mean Urea
295 Mother 0-12 weeks LH
296 Mother 24-40 weeks RDW
297 Mother 12-24 weeks HbA2
298 Mother 0-12 weeks MCV
299 Mother Pre-pregnancy MONO %
300 Mother Pre-pregnancy HB
301 Child mean Micro %/hypo %
302 Mother 24-40 weeks LUC %
303 Mother count Enoxaparin
304 Child mean Monocytes abs-dif
305 Mother 24-40 weeks MONO %
306 Mother 0-12 weeks NEUT %
307 Mother 24-40 weeks WBC
308 Child diagnosed Acute conjunctivitis
309 Father mean Non-hdl_cholesterol
310 Child mean Neutrophils %-dif
311 Mother 0-12 weeks EOS %
312 Mother 0-12 weeks RDW
313 Mother Pre-pregnancy RDW
314 Mother 12-24 weeks LYM %
315 Mother Pre-pregnancy SHBG
316 Mother Pre-pregnancy FOLIC ACID
317 Child mean Transferrin
318 Child diagnosed Other viral diseases; nos
319 Mother 0-12 weeks HYPO %
320 Mother Pre-pregnancy MICRO %
321 Mother 24-40 weeks BILIRUBIN TOTAL
322 Child mean Lymphocytes %-dif
323 Mother Pre-pregnancy SODIUM
324 Mother Pre-pregnancy RBC
325 Child diagnosed Teething syndrome
326 Child count Prednisolone
327 Mother 24-40 weeks BASO %
328 Mother 24-40 weeks LYMPHOCYTES abs-DIF
329 Mother 0-12 weeks PROGESTERONE
330 Father BMI count
331 Mother Pre-pregnancy TRIGLYCERIDES
332 Father max Cholesterol
333 Mother 12-24 weeks LYMP.abs
334 Child diagnosed Benign neoplasm of skin, site unspecified
335 Mother last Diastolic Blood Pressure 0-12 weeks
336 Mother Pre-pregnancy GLOBULIN
337 Mother 24-40 weeks CREATININE
338 Father max Cholesterol-ldl calc
339 Father max Cholesterol- hdl
340 Mother Pre-pregnancy ESR
341 Mother 12-24 weeks PT-SEC
342 Mother 24-40 weeks LUC abs
343 Mother 24-40 weeks MPXI
344 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI std
345 Mother 12-24 weeks FERRITIN
346 Mother 0-12 weeks MPXI
347 Mother 0-12 weeks TSH
348 Mother 24-40 weeks GOT (AST)
349 Mother 24-40 weeks HYPER %
350 Mother 24-40 weeks EOSINOPHILS abs-DIF
351 Mother 12-24 weeks WBC
352 Father mean Cholesterol-ldl calc
353 Ethnicity: Iran
354 Child count Dimethindene
355 Father std Triglycerides
356 Mother Pre-pregnancy HDW
357 Mother 0-12 weeks UREA
358 Mother 12-24 weeks HCT
359 Mother Pre-pregnancy HEPATITIS Bs Ab
360 Child mean Triglycerides
361 Child diagnosed Acute lymphadenitis
362 Mother 0-12 weeks LDH
363 Mother 12-24 weeks POTASSIUM
364 Child mean Neut %
365 Child diagnosed Unspecified fetal and neonatal jaundice
366 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight std
367 Mother 12-24 weeks MICRO %
368 Mother Pre-pregnancy BILIRUBIN TOTAL
369 Mother 0-12 weeks HB
370 Child mean Mpxi
371 Mother Pre-pregnancy C-REACTIVE PROTEIN
372 Mother Pre-pregnancy MCV
373 Mother Pre-pregnancy DHEA SULPHATE
374 Child mean Pct
375 Father min Cholesterol
376 Locality type: Jewish Locality 50,000-99,999 residents
377 Mother Pre-pregnancy EOS %
378 Father median Cholesterol
379 Child mean Hct/hgb ratio
380 Mother 24-40 weeks BILIRUBIN-DIRECT
381 Child diagnosed Diaper or napkin rash
382 Mother 24-40 weeks STABS %-DIF
383 Child mean Stabs abs-dif
384 Siblings at 5 years of age BMI zscore std
385 Child diagnosed Congenital anomalies of lower limb, including
pelvic girdle
386 Father std Cholesterol- hdl
387 Child count Cefalexin
388 Mother 12-24 weeks HYPO %
389 Child diagnosed Oral aphthae
390 Mother 24-40 weeks STABS abs-DIF
391 Child mean Phosphorus
392 Mother 0-12 weeks LUC %
393 Mother 12-24 weeks SODIUM
394 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE (GTT) 60′
395 Mother 24-40 weeks CHOLESTEROL
396 Child count Erythromycin
397 No. of Siblings with BMI data
398 Mother 12-24 weeks CREATININE
399 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE (GTT) 180′
400 Mother 12-24 weeks EOS.abs
401 Child diagnosed Asthma
402 Mother Pre-pregnancy COMPLEMENT C3
403 Mother Pre-pregnancy EOS.abs
404 Ethnicity: Asian
405 Mother 24-40 weeks T3- FREE
406 Mother Pre-pregnancy FERRITIN
407 Mother Pre-pregnancy AMYLASE
408 Father count Pravastatin
409 Mother 24-40 weeks MONOCYTES abs-DIF
410 Mother 24-40 weeks GPT (ALT)
411 Mother Pre-pregnancy URIC ACID
412 Father diagnosed Obesity, unspecified
413 Mother 24-40 weeks NEUTROPHILS %-DIF
414 Child diagnosed Bronchopneumonia, organism unspecified
415 Mother 0-12 weeks MCHC
416 Mother 12-24 weeks MONO %
417 Mother Pre-pregnancy FIBRINOGEN CALCU
418 Mother Pre-pregnancy MPXI
419 Child Beta lactam Penicillin Antibiotics prescription day counts
420 Mother 0-12 weeks URIC ACID
421 Mother Pre-pregnancy LH
422 Mother 24-40 weeks MACRO %
423 Mother Pre-pregnancy MCH
424 Mother 24-40 weeks BASO abs
425 Father count Cholesterol-ldl calc
426 Mother 0-12 weeks MICRO %
427 Mother Weight delta Pre-pregnancy to 0-12 weeks
428 Child diagnosed Constipation
429 Siblings std BMI zscore std
430 Mother 24-40 weeks LDH
431 Mother 0-12 weeks PLT
432 Siblings at 13 years of age BMI zscore std
433 Father count Glucose
434 Mother Pre-pregnancy BILIRUBIN INDIRECT
435 Child mean Eosinophils %-dif
436 Mother 24-40 weeks URIC ACID
437 Mother BMI delta Pre-pregnancy to 0-12 weeks
438 Mother 12-24 weeks GGT
439 Mother 0-12 weeks GPT (ALT)
440 Mother 0-12 weeks PHOSPHORUS
441 Mother Pre-pregnancy LUC %
442 Child diagnosed U.r.i. (head cold)
443 Mother 0-12 weeks HYPER %
444 Mother 0-12 weeks CREATININE
445 Mother 12-24 weeks MICRO %/HYPO %
446 Mother 0-12 weeks MACRO %
447 Mother 12-24 weeks RDW
448 Mother Pre-pregnancy POTASSIUM
449 Mother 0-12 weeks RBC
450 Mother Pre-pregnancy ALK. PHOSPHATASE
451 Child diagnosed Enlargement of lymph nodes
452 Mother Pre-pregnancy ALBUMIN
453 Mother 12-24 weeks TRIGLYCERIDES
454 Mother 0-12 weeks AMYLASE
455 Father min Cholesterol-ldl calc
456 Mother 0-12 weeks ALK. PHOSPHATASE
457 Mother Pre-pregnancy PT-SEC
458 Child diagnosed Diarrhea
459 Mother 0-12 weeks VITAMIN D (25-OH)
460 Child diagnosed Pneumonia
461 Mother 12-24 weeks MCH
462 Child mean Potassium
463 Mother Pre-pregnancy CALCIUM
464 Father count Cholesterol- hdl
465 Father median Cholesterol-ldl calc
466 Mother Pre-pregnancy COMPLEMENT C4
467 Mother count Ofloxacin
468 Child mean C-reactive protein
469 Mother last Weight 24-40 weeks
470 Mother 0-12 weeks CHOLESTEROL-LDL calc
471 Mother Pre-pregnancy MACRO %
472 Mother count Phenoxymethylpenicillin
473 Mother 0-12 weeks HDW
474 Mother 24-40 weeks TRIGLYCERIDES
475 Mother Pre-pregnancy TESTOSTERONE- TOTAL
476 Father std Non-hdl_cholesterol
477 Child diagnosed Contusion of unspecified site
478 Mother 0-12 weeks NON-HDL_CHOLESTEROL
479 Child diagnosed Esophagitis
480 Child mean Macro %
481 Mother last Diastolic Blood Pressure Pre-pregnancy
482 Mother 0-12 weeks APTT-sec
483 Child count Cefuroxime
484 Child diagnosed Atopic dermatitis/eczema
485 Mother 24-40 weeks MICRO %/HYPO %
486 Ethnicity: USSR
487 Mother 12-24 weeks MPXI
488 Mother 0-12 weeks BASO %
489 Father min Non-hdl_cholesterol
490 Mother Pre-pregnancy NON-HDL_CHOLESTEROL
491 Mother 0-12 weeks GLOBULIN
492 Mother 12-24 weeks MACRO %
493 Child diagnosed Stridor
494 Father count Simvastatin
495 Mother 12-24 weeks LUC abs
496 Child diagnosed Infectious diarrhea
497 Mother 12-24 weeks PT-INR
498 Mother 0-12 weeks GOT (AST)
499 Father min Cholesterol/hdl
500 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE
501 Mother 24-40 weeks EOS.abs
502 Child diagnosed Chronic rhinitis
503 Mother 12-24 weeks UREA
504 Mother 0-12 weeks PROTEIN-TOTAL
505 Mother Pre-pregnancy ALY
506 Mother Pre-pregnancy FREE ANDROGEN INDEX
507 Child diagnosed Unsp.viral infect.in conditions classif.elsewhere,
unsp.site
508 Mother 0-12 weeks POTASSIUM
509 Mother 12-24 weeks AMYLASE
510 Mother 12-24 weeks CK—CREAT.KINASE(CPK)
511 Mother Pre-pregnancy GPT (ALT)
512 Mother 0-12 weeks CHOLESTEROL
513 Mother 12-24 weeks BASO %
514 Child diagnosed Anorexia
515 Mother Pre-pregnancy CORTISOL-BLOOD
516 Mother 24-40 weeks RDW-CV
517 Mother Pre-pregnancy ESTRADIOL (E-2)
518 Mother 12-24 weeks MPV
519 Child diagnosed Other specified disease of white blood cells
520 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROLACTIN
521 Mother 24-40 weeks TSH
522 is Male
523 Child diagnosed Lack of expected normal physiological
development
524 Mother 0-12 weeks CK—CREAT.KINASE(CPK)
525 Father median Non-hdl_cholesterol
526 Father mean Cholesterol/hdl
527 Mother 0-12 weeks FOLIC ACID
528 Mother 24-40 weeks IRON
529 Mother 0-12 weeks LUC abs
530 Mother Pre-pregnancy RUBELLA Ab IgG
531 Mother 0-12 weeks ALBUMIN
532 Child mean Bilirubin-direct
533 Mother 0-12 weeks IRON
534 Mother 0-12 weeks RUBELLA Ab IgG
535 Mother 24-40 weeks AMYLASE
536 Number of twin siblings
537 Mother Pre-pregnancy ANDROSTENEDIONE
538 Father count Enalapril
539 Mother count Mebendazole
540 Mother 24-40 weeks CHLORIDE
541 Child diagnosed Influenza
542 Child count Desloratadine
543 Mother 24-40 weeks HDW
544 Child count Ketotifen
545 Child diagnosed Dermatitis due to food taken internally
546 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE (GTT) 120′
547 Father count Cholesterol
548 Mother 12-24 weeks PCT
549 Mother 24-40 weeks UREA
550 Child count Ipratropium bromide
551 Child diagnosed Acute pharyngitis
552 Child diagnosed Acute suppurative otitis media
553 Mother 0-12 weeks TOXOPLASMA IgG
554 Mother Pre-pregnancy MICRO %/HYPO %
555 Mother 24-40 weeks PROTEIN-TOTAL
556 Mother 12-24 weeks TOXOPLASMA IgG
557 Mother 0-12 weeks FSH
558 Father count Non-hdl_cholesterol
559 Child diagnosed Acute nasopharyngitis (common cold)
560 Mother 24-40 weeks CHOLESTEROL- HDL
561 Mother 24-40 weeks PT-SEC
562 Mother Pre-pregnancy ANTI CARDIOLIPIN IgG
563 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI count
564 Mother 24-40 weeks PDW
565 Mother 24-40 weeks MONOCYTES %-DIF
566 Mother 0-12 weeks MICRO %/HYPO %
567 Mother Pre-pregnancy TRANSFERRIN
568 Mother Pre-pregnancy GOT (AST)
569 Child diagnosed Other diseases of conjunctiva due to viruses and
chlamydiae
570 Mother Pre-pregnancy PT-INR
571 Mother 24-40 weeks CALCIUM
572 Child diagnosed Other atopic dermatitis and related conditions
573 Mother 0-12 weeks HEMOGLOBIN A
574 Mother Pre-pregnancy LUC abs
575 Father count Amlodipine
576 Mother 12-24 weeks ALK. PHOSPHATASE
577 Father count Triglycerides
578 Mother 0-12 weeks CALCIUM
579 Child count Azithromycin
580 Mother 12-24 weeks FOLIC ACID
581 Mother Pre-pregnancy FSH
582 Child diagnosed Pneumonia, organism unspecified
583 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHOLESTEROL- HDL
584 Locality type: Non-Jewish Other Rural Locality
585 Child count Ahiston drop cd
586 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROGESTERONE
587 Mother 0-12 weeks T4- FREE
588 Mother 12-24 weeks BASO abs
589 Child diagnosed Other and unspec.noninfectious gastroenteritis
and colitis
590 Child diagnosed Asthma, unspecified
591 Mother Pre-pregnancy ANTITHROMBIN-III
592 Mother 24-40 weeks TOXOPLASMA IgG
593 Mother 0-12 weeks PT-SEC
594 Child diagnosed Volume depletion disorder
595 Mother Pre-pregnancy CONTROL PTT
596 Mother 24-40 weeks EOSINOPHILS %-DIF
597 Mother Pre-pregnancy 17-OH-PROGESTERONE
598 Father count Cholesterol/hdl
599 Mother Pre-pregnancy IRON
600 Mother Pre-pregnancy HEMOGLOBIN A1C %
601 Mother 12-24 weeks HYPER %
602 Mother 0-12 weeks BASO abs
603 Locality type: Non-Jewish Locality 2,000-4,999 residents
604 Mother Pre-pregnancy APTT-sec
605 Mother count Fluticasone
606 Mother 24-40 weeks HCT/HGB Ratio
607 Father count Bezafibrate
608 Locality type: Jewish Locality 200,000-499,999 residents
609 Father diagnosed Obesity (bmi >30)
610 Mother count Omeprazole
611 Child count Co-amoxiclav cd
612 Mother 24-40 weeks PT-INR
613 Mother Pre-pregnancy HCT/HGB Ratio
614 Child count Montelukast
615 Child diagnosed Infectious colitis, enteritis, and gastroenteritis
616 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight count
617 Mother count Estradiol
618 Mother 24-40 weeks PCT
619 Mother Pre-pregnancy T3-TOTAL
620 Mother count Follitropin alfa
621 Child diagnosed Acute bronchitis
622 Ethnicity: Yemen
623 Child diagnosed Abdominal pain
624 Child diagnosed Other and unspecified injury to unspecified site
625 Child count Prothiazine/promethazine expectorant cd
626 Mother 24-40 weeks PT %
627 Locality type: Moshav
628 Mother Pre-pregnancy VLDL
629 Mother 24-40 weeks POTASSIUM
630 Child count Co-trimoxazole cd
631 Mother 12-24 weeks HbF
632 Mother 24-40 weeks BILIRUBIN INDIRECT
633 Mother 24-40 weeks GLOM.FILTR.RATE
634 Mother 24-40 weeks PHOSPHORUS
635 Father max Cholesterol/hdl
636 Child diagnosed Iron deficiency anemia, unspecified
637 Mother Pre-pregnancy ALY %
638 Child diagnosed Rash and other nonspecific skin eruption
639 Mother 0-12 weeks PT %
640 Mother 12-24 weeks PT %
641 Mother 24-40 weeks TRANSFERRIN
642 Father Weight count
643 Child diagnosed Late effect of injury to cranial nerve
644 Mother Pre-pregnancy T3- FREE
645 Mother 12-24 weeks PROTEIN-TOTAL
646 Cesarean birth
647 Mother Pre-pregnancy BASO abs
648 Mother 0-12 weeks T3- FREE
649 Mother Pre-pregnancy RDW-CV
650 Mother count Levothyroxine sodium
651 Child Sulfonamides Antibiotics prescription day counts
652 Mother 12-24 weeks ALBUMIN
653 Child diagnosed Undescended testicle
654 Mother 12-24 weeks CHOLESTEROL
655 Child diagnosed Hearing complaints
656 Mother 24-40 weeks MAGNESIUM
657 Mother 0-12 weeks PDW
658 Mother 0-12 weeks TRANSFERRIN
659 Mother 24-40 weeks HbA2
660 Mother 12-24 weeks T3- FREE
661 Mother count Aspirin
662 Mother 0-12 weeks BLOOD TYPE
663 Mother count Human menopausal gonadotrophin
664 Mother count Co-amoxiclav cd
665 Mother 24-40 weeks T4- FREE
666 Child diagnosed Contact dermatitis and other eczema, unspecified
cause
667 Mother 0-12 weeks DHEA SULPHATE
668 Child diagnosed Intestinal malabsorption
669 Mother 0-12 weeks PROLACTIN
670 Child diagnosed Blepharitis
671 Mother 24-40 weeks LYMPHOCYTES %-DIF
672 Mother 0-12 weeks FERRITIN
673 Mother count Symbicort/duoresp
674 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROTEIN C ACTIVITY
675 Mother 0-12 weeks HCT/HGB Ratio
676 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHOLESTEROL/HDL
677 Child count Metronidazole
678 Mother 12-24 weeks NORMOBLAST.abs
679 Father median Cholesterol/hdl
680 Mother 24-40 weeks ALBUMIN
681 Child diagnosed Candidiasis of skin and nails
682 Mother last Diastolic Blood Pressure 12-24 weeks
683 Mother 0-12 weeks RDW-CV
684 Mother 12-24 weeks URIC ACID
685 Apidoral given at birth
686 Mother 12-24 weeks BILIRUBIN TOTAL
687 Child diagnosed Irritable infant
688 Child diagnosed Varicella without mention of complication
689 Mother 0-12 weeks BILIRUBIN TOTAL
690 Father diagnosed Other and unspecified hyperlipidemia
691 Child diagnosed Infective otitis externa
692 Child diagnosed Insect bite
693 Mother Pre-pregnancy ANTI CARDIOLIPIN IgM
694 Child diagnosed Stenosis and insufficiency of lacrimal passages
695 Mother 24-40 weeks APTT-sec
696 Mother 24-40 weeks VITAMIN D (25-OH)
697 Mother 24-40 weeks GLOBULIN
698 Mother Pre-pregnancy CA-125
699 Child diagnosed Acute and unspecified inflammation of lacrimal
passages
700 Mother count Cetirizine
701 Child diagnosed Anal fissure
702 Child diagnosed Impetigo
703 Child diagnosed Laceration/cut
704 Mother 12-24 weeks APTT-sec
705 Mother 12-24 weeks LDH
706 Child diagnosed Contact dermatitis and other eczema
707 Mother 24-40 weeks CK—CREAT.KINASE(CPK)
708 Child diagnosed Serous otitis media; glue
709 Mother 0-12 weeks BILIRUBIN-DIRECT
710 Mother 12-24 weeks GPT (ALT)
711 Child count Fluticasone
712 Mother Pre-pregnancy APTT-R
713 Mother 24-40 weeks FIBRINOGEN CALCU
714 Mother 12-24 weeks NORMOBLAST.%
715 Child diagnosed Injuries
716 Mother 0-12 weeks CHOLESTEROL- HDL
717 Mother count Desogestrel
718 Mother Pre-pregnancy EOSINOPHILS %-DIF
719 Child diagnosed Wheezing baby syndrome
720 Mother 24-40 weeks FOLIC ACID
721 Mother Pre-pregnancy IgA
722 Child diagnosed Croup
723 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROT-S ANTIGEN (FREE
724 Mother count Lansoprazole
725 Mother 12-24 weeks CHOLESTEROL-LDL calc
726 Child diagnosed Diseases and other conditions of the tongue
727 Mother 12-24 weeks ALPHA FETOPROTEIN TM
728 Mother 12-24 weeks GLUCOSE 50 g
729 Mother 0-12 weeks HbF
730 Locality type: Collective Moshav
731 Child diagnosed Abnormal loss of weight
732 Child diagnosed Other diseases of nasal cavity and sinuses
733 Mother BMI delta 0-12 weeks to 12-24 weeks
734 Mother 0-12 weeks BILIRUBIN INDIRECT
735 Mother Weight delta 12-24 weeks to 24-40 weeks
736 Child diagnosed Acute laryngitis
737 Locality type: Jewish Locality 20,000-49,999 residents
738 Mother count Cefuroxime
739 Mother 12-24 weeks CALCIUM
740 Father diagnosed Essential hypertension
741 Mother Pre-pregnancy MONOCYTES abs-DIF
742 Child diagnosed Umbilical hernia without mention of
obstruction or gangrene
743 Child diagnosed Allergy/allergic react nos
744 Child diagnosed Congenital musculoskeletal deformities of
sternocleidomastoid
745 Child diagnosed Other speech disturbance
746 Mother 12-24 weeks RDW-CV
747 Mother 0-12 weeks PCT
748 Mother Pre-pregnancy LYMPHOCYTES %-DIF
749 Mother 24-40 weeks NORMOBLAST.abs
750 Child diagnosed Enterobiasis
751 Mother Pre-pregnancy FIBRINOGEN
752 Mother count Cefalexin
753 Child count Ceftriaxone
754 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHLORIDE
755 Mother count Progesterone
756 Locality type: Jewish Other Rural Locality
757 Child diagnosed Other and unspecified chronic nonsuppurative
otitis media
758 Mother 12-24 weeks GOT (AST)
759 Mother 12-24 weeks PDW
760 Locality type: Jewish Locality 2,000-4,999 residents
761 Father diagnosed Morbid obesity
762 Mother Pre-pregnancy BLOOD TYPE
763 Mother 0-12 weeks HbA2
764 Mother Weight delta 0-12 weeks to 12-24 weeks
765 Mother 24-40 weeks NON-HDL_CHOLESTEROL
766 Mother 12-24 weeks HDW
767 Mother Pre-pregnancy GLOM.FILTR.RATE
768 Child diagnosed Otalgia
769 Child diagnosed Unspecified otitis media
770 Premature birth
771 Child diagnosed Unsp.adv.effect of drug, medicinal/biological
substance n.e.s.
772 Mother Pre-pregnancy VITAMIN D (25-OH)
773 Mother 24-40 weeks CHOLESTEROL-LDL calc
774 Mother 12-24 weeks CHLORIDE
775 Born in Israel
776 Mother 12-24 weeks CHOLESTEROL- HDL
777 Mother Pre-pregnancy HbA2
778 Mother 0-12 weeks CHLORIDE
779 Locality type: Communal Locality
780 Mother Pre-pregnancy LIC
781 Locality type: Jewish Locality 5,000-9,999 residents
782 Mother 24-40 weeks NORMOBLAST.%
783 Locality type: Jewish Locality 500,000 and more residents
784 Locality type: Kibbutz
785 Locality type: Moshav 2,000-4,999 residents
786 Mother 0-12 weeks NORMOBLAST.%
787 Mother Pre-pregnancy NORMOBLAST.%
788 Locality type: Non-Jewish Locality 20,000-49,999 residents
789 Child diagnosed Urticaria
790 Mother Pre-pregnancy LIC %
791 Mother 24-40 weeks LI
792 Mother Pre-pregnancy NEUTROPHILS abs-DIF
793 Mother Pre-pregnancy TOXOPLASMA IgG
794 Locality type: Non-Jewish Locality 50,000-99,999 residents
795 Mother 24-40 weeks CONTROL PTT
796 Mother 12-24 weeks NON-HDL_CHOLESTEROL
797 Mother Pre-pregnancy HbF
798 Child diagnosed Vomiting (excl.preg. w06)
799 Mother Pre-pregnancy NEUTROPHILS %-DIF
800 Father Height count
801 Mother Pre-pregnancy MONOCYTES %-DIF
802 Mother Pre-pregnancy LYMPHOCYTES abs-DIF
803 Mother 12-24 weeks PHOSPHORUS
804 Mother 12-24 weeks HbA
805 Mother Pre-pregnancy HEMOGLOBIN A
806 Mother 24-40 weeks GGT
807 Mother 12-24 weeks BILIRUBIN-DIRECT
808 Ethnicity: Africa
809 Mother 0-12 weeks HbA
810 Child diagnosed Viral pneumonia
811 Ethnicity: Mediterranean
812 Child diagnosed Viral exanthem, unspecified
813 Mother 24-40 weeks FIBRINOGEN
814 Ethnicity: Latin America
815 Child diagnosed Torticollis, unspecified
816 Child diagnosed Congenital dislocation of hip
817 Mother 0-12 weeks NORMOBLAST.abs
818 Mother count Carbamazepine
819 Mother count Norgestimate and ethinylestradiol
820 Mother count Norethisterone
821 Mother count Nitrofurantoin
822 Mother count Metronidazole
823 Mother count Methylphenidate
824 Mother count Medroxyprogesterone
825 Mother count Loratadine
826 Mother count Ipratropium bromide
827 Mother count Gestodene and ethinylestradiol
828 Mother count Follitropin beta
829 Mother count Fluoxetine
830 Mother count Fluconazole
831 Mother count Fexofenadine
832 Mother count Famotidine
833 Mother count Escitalopram
834 Mother 0-12 weeks PT-INR
835 Mother count Dydrogesterone
836 Mother count Drospirenone and ethinylestradiol
837 Mother count Doxycycline
838 Mother count Dexamethasone
839 Mother count Desogestrel and ethinylestradiol
840 Mother count Desloratadine
841 Mother count Colchicine
842 Mother count Clonazepam
843 Mother count Clomifene
844 Mother count Clarithromycin
845 Mother count Citalopram
846 Mother count Ciprofloxacin
847 Mother count Chorionic gonadotrophin
848 Mother count Paroxetine
849 Child diagnosed Hand, foot, and mouth disease
850 Mother count Prednisone
851 Mother 12-24 weeks TRANSFERRIN
852 Child diagnosed Chronic serous otitis media
853 Child diagnosed Cellulitis and abscess of unspecified sites
854 Child diagnosed Cellulitis and abscess of finger
855 Child diagnosed Candidiasis of unspecified site
856 Child diagnosed Candidiasis of mouth
857 Child diagnosed Blisters with epidermal loss, burn
2nd.deg.unspecified site
858 Child diagnosed Convulsions
859 Child diagnosed Delivery in a completely normal case
860 Child diagnosed Anemia other/unspecified
861 Child diagnosed Allergy, unspecified, not elsewhere classified
862 Child diagnosed Allergic rhinitis
863 Child diagnosed Agranulocytosis
864 Child diagnosed Dermatophytosis of the body
865 Child diagnosed Disorders relating to other preterm infants
866 Mother count Progyluton cd
867 Child diagnosed Enteritis due to specified virus
868 Child diagnosed Acute myringitis without mention of otitis media
869 Child diagnosed Acute laryngotracheitis
870 Child diagnosed Feeding difficulties and mismanagement
871 Child diagnosed Acquired deformities of other parts of limbs
872 Child diagnosed Accident/injury; nos
873 Child diagnosed Abnormal weight gain
874 Mother count Triptorelin
875 Mother count Simvastatin
876 Mother count Sertraline
877 Mother count Seretide cd
878 Mother count Salbutamol
879 Child diagnosed Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
880 Mother count Choriogonadotropin alfa
881 Child diagnosed Hemangioma of unspecified site
882 Child diagnosed Tongue tie
883 Mother count Budesonide
884 Child diagnosed Nonsuppurative otitis media, not specified as
acute or chronic
885 Child diagnosed Open wound of face, without mention of
complication
886 Mother 12-24 weeks GLOBULIN
887 Child diagnosed Other serum reaction, not elsewhere classified
888 Child diagnosed Other specified erythematous conditions
889 Mother 12-24 weeks BILIRUBIN INDIRECT
890 Child diagnosed Other specified viral exanthemata
891 Child diagnosed Other symptoms involving digestive system
892 Father count Rosuvastatin
893 Father count Ramipril-hydrochlorothiazide cd
894 Father count Ramipril
895 Father count Propranolol
896 Father count Nifedipine-cd
897 Father count Nifedipine
898 Father count Metformin and sitagliptin cd
899 Mother 0-12 weeks GLOM.FILTR.RATE
900 Father count Insulin glargine
901 Child diagnosed Posttraumatic wound infection not elsewhere
classified
902 Father count Bisoprolol
903 Father count Atorvastatin
904 Father count Atenolol
905 Child diagnosed Premat/immature liveborn infant
906 Child diagnosed Seborrhea
907 Child diagnosed Seborrheic dermatitis, unspecified
908 Mother 12-24 weeks RUBELLA Ab IgG
909 Child diagnosed Sneezing/nasal congestion
910 Child diagnosed Stomatitis
911 Child diagnosed Strabismus and other disorders of binocular eye
movements
912 Mother Pre-pregnancy NORMOBLAST.abs
913 Child diagnosed Nervousness
914 Child diagnosed Laxity of ligament
915 Mother 0-12 weeks ESR
916 Child diagnosed Hypermetropia
917 Mother count Bethamethasone
918 Mother count Anti-d (rh) immunoglobulin
919 Mother count Aciclovir
920 Child diagnosed Herpangina
921 Mother 12-24 weeks BLOOD TYPE
922 Mother 24-40 weeks BLOOD TYPE
923 Child count Ranitidine
924 Child count Phenoxymethylpenicillin
925 Child count Mebendazole
926 Child count Loratadine
927 Child diagnosed Hip symptoms/complaints
928 Child diagnosed Hydrocele
929 Child diagnosed Hydronephrosis
930 Child count Cefaclor
931 Mother 12-24 weeks HCT/HGB Ratio
932 Child diagnosed Infectious mononucleosis
933 Child count Aciclovir
934 Father diagnosed Unspecified essential hypertension
935 Father diagnosed Overweight (bmi <30)
936 Father diagnosed Other abnormal glucose
937 Father diagnosed Lipid metabolism disorder
938 Father diagnosed Impaired fasting glucose
939 Father diagnosed Disorders of lipoid metabolism
940 Father diagnosed Diabetes mellitus without mention of
complication
941 Child diagnosed Inguinal hernia, without mention of obstruction or
gangrene
942 Father diagnosed Adult-onset type diabetes mellitus whithout
complication
943 Child diagnosed Insect bite, nonvenomous face, neck, scalp
without infection
944 Child diagnosed Jaundice, unspecified, not of newborn
945 Mother count Lamotrigine

Table 1.2 presents a list of 620 parameters from which parameters for feeing the machine learning procedure can be selected when the subject is when the subject is an unborn subject. The list is sorted according the significance of the respective feature for predicting the likelihood for childhood obesity, in descending order, so that from the standpoint of prediction accuracy it is more preferred to select a parameter that is listed higher in Table 1.2, than a parameter that is listed lower in Table 1.2. For example, when N parameters are used, it is preferred to select those parameters from lines 1 through M of Table 1.2, where N≤M≤620.

TABLE 1.2
No. Parameter
1 Siblings median BMI zscore mean
2 Siblings mean BMI zscore mean
3 Siblings max BMI zscore mean
4 Father BMI median
5 Father BMI max
6 Siblings at 5 years of age BMI zscore mean
7 Siblings min BMI zscore mean
8 Father BMI mean
9 Father BMI min
10 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI max
11 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI median
12 Mother 24-40 weeks MCV
13 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI mean
14 Mother 24-40 weeks MCH
15 Age of Father at birth
16 Siblings count BMI zscore std
17 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI min
18 Mother last BMI 24-40 weeks
19 Age of Mother at birth
20 Father Weight median
21 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight max
22 Mother last BMI 0-12 weeks
23 Father Height median
24 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight mean
25 Mother 12-24 weeks VITAMIN B12
26 Mother 0-12 weeks MCH
27 Father std Cholesterol
28 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight median
29 Siblings min BMI zscore std
30 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight min
31 Mother Pre-pregnancy CMV IgG
32 Mother Pre-pregnancy PDW
33 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE 50 g
34 Mother Pre-pregnancy GGT
35 Father Height mean
36 Siblings mean BMI zscore std
37 Father max Triglycerides
38 Mother 12-24 weeks RBC
39 Mother 0-12 weeks WBC
40 Siblings std BMI zscore mean
41 Mother last Diastolic Blood Pressure 24-40 weeks
42 Mother 12-24 weeks HB
43 Mother 12-24 weeks LUC %
44 Mother 0-12 weeks VITAMIN B12
45 Mother 0-12 weeks HCT
46 Mother Pre-pregnancy GLUCOSE 50 g
47 Father mean Cholesterol- hdl
48 Father mean Triglycerides
49 Father Height min
50 Siblings count BMI zscore mean
51 Mother 0-12 weeks LYMP.abs
52 Mother Pre-pregnancy GLUCOSE
53 Mother last BMI 12-24 weeks
54 Father std Glucose
55 Mother Pre-pregnancy CK—CREAT.KINASE(CPK)
56 Father std Cholesterol-ldl calc
57 Father min Cholesterol- hdl
58 Mother last BMI Pre-pregnancy
59 Mother Pre-pregnancy TSH
60 Mother last Weight Pre-pregnancy
61 Mother Pre-pregnancy MCHC
62 Mother Pre-pregnancy LYMP.abs
63 Siblings median BMI zscore std
64 Mother 12-24 weeks IRON
65 Mother count Roxithromycin
66 Mother last Weight 12-24 weeks
67 Mother 24-40 weeks MPV
68 Mother 12-24 weeks GLUCOSE
69 Mother Pre-pregnancy PT %
70 Mother 24-40 weeks VITAMIN B12
71 Father max Glucose
72 Father Weight max
73 Mother 24-40 weeks EOS %
74 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE (GTT) 0′
75 Mother Pre-pregnancy HCT
76 Mother Pre-pregnancy BILIRUBIN-DIRECT
77 Mother 0-12 weeks MPV
78 Siblings max BMI zscore std
79 Father mean Glucose
80 Mother 0-12 weeks NEUT.abs
81 Father Weight mean
82 Mother Pre-pregnancy T4- FREE
83 Mother 24-40 weeks RBC
84 Mother Pre-pregnancy LYM %
85 Mother 24-40 weeks ALK. PHOSPHATASE
86 Mother 0-12 weeks EOS.abs
87 Father min Triglycerides
88 Mother 0-12 weeks MONO.abs
89 Mother Pre-pregnancy MPV
90 Mother Pre-pregnancy NEUT %
91 Mother 24-40 weeks APTT-R
92 Siblings at 13 years of age BMI zscore mean
93 Mother Pre-pregnancy PHOSPHORUS
94 Father count Metformin
95 Mother Pre-pregnancy NEUT.abs
96 Mother 12-24 weeks MCHC
97 Mother 24-40 weeks HEMOGLOBIN A1C %
98 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHOLESTEROL-LDL calc
99 Mother last Systolic Blood Pressure 0-12 weeks
100 Father median Triglycerides
101 Mother 24-40 weeks MICRO %
102 Mother last Systolic Blood Pressure 12-24 weeks
103 Mother 24-40 weeks MONO.abs
104 Mother 12-24 weeks PLT
105 Mother Pre-pregnancy LDH
106 Mother 0-12 weeks HEPATITIS Bs Ab
107 Mother Pre-pregnancy PLT
108 Father min Glucose
109 Father max Non-hdl_cholesterol
110 Mother 12-24 weeks NEUT %
111 Mother 24-40 weeks HYPO %
112 Mother last Systolic Blood Pressure Pre-pregnancy
113 Father Height max
114 Mother last Systolic Blood Pressure 24-40 weeks
115 Father median Cholesterol- hdl
116 Mother 12-24 weeks T4- FREE
117 Mother Pre-pregnancy UREA
118 Mother Pre-pregnancy MAGNESIUM
119 Mother 0-12 weeks CHOLESTEROL/HDL
120 Mother 24-40 weeks LYM %
121 Mother 12-24 weeks MCV
122 Mother Pre-pregnancy MONO.abs
123 Mother Pre-pregnancy WBC
124 Mother 12-24 weeks MONO.abs
125 Mother 24-40 weeks HCT
126 Mother 0-12 weeks CMV IgG
127 Mother 24-40 weeks PLT
128 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROTEIN-TOTAL
129 Mother 12-24 weeks CMV IgG
130 Mother 24-40 weeks CMV IgG
131 Mother 0-12 weeks SODIUM
132 Mother 24-40 weeks NEUT %
133 Mother 24-40 weeks MCHC
134 Father Weight min
135 Mother count Amoxicillin
136 Father mean Cholesterol
137 Father median Glucose
138 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHOLESTEROL
139 Mother 0-12 weeks MONO %
140 Mother 24-40 weeks LYMP.abs
141 Mother 12-24 weeks NEUT.abs
142 Mother Pre-pregnancy HYPER %
143 Mother 12-24 weeks TSH
144 Mother count Cabergoline
145 Mother last Weight 0-12 weeks
146 Mother Pre-pregnancy PCT
147 Father Height std
148 Mother 0-12 weeks TRIGLYCERIDES
149 Mother 0-12 weeks GLUCOSE
150 Father std Cholesterol/hdl
151 Mother Pre-pregnancy HYPO %
152 Mother 24-40 weeks FERRITIN
153 Father BMI std
154 Mother Pre-pregnancy BASO %
155 Mother 24-40 weeks SODIUM
156 Mother Pre-pregnancy VITAMIN B12
157 Mother 0-12 weeks ESTRADIOL (E-2)
158 Mother 0-12 weeks LYM %
159 Mother 12-24 weeks EOS %
160 Mother 24-40 weeks NEUT.abs
161 Mother 24-40 weeks NEUTROPHILS abs-DIF
162 Father diagnosed Diabetes mellitus
163 Mother Pre-pregnancy CREATININE
164 Father Weight std
165 Mother 24-40 weeks HB
166 Mother BMI delta 12-24 weeks to 24-40 weeks
167 Mother 0-12 weeks GGT
168 Mother 0-12 weeks LH
169 Mother 24-40 weeks RDW
170 Mother 12-24 weeks HbA2
171 Mother 0-12 weeks MCV
172 Mother Pre-pregnancy MONO %
173 Mother Pre-pregnancy HB
174 Mother 24-40 weeks LUC %
175 Mother count Enoxaparin
176 Mother 24-40 weeks MONO %
177 Mother 0-12 weeks NEUT %
178 Mother 24-40 weeks WBC
179 Father mean Non-hdl_cholesterol
180 Mother 0-12 weeks EOS %
181 Mother 0-12 weeks RDW
182 Mother Pre-pregnancy RDW
183 Mother 12-24 weeks LYM %
184 Mother Pre-pregnancy SHBG
185 Mother Pre-pregnancy FOLIC ACID
186 Mother 0-12 weeks HYPO %
187 Mother Pre-pregnancy MICRO %
188 Mother 24-40 weeks BILIRUBIN TOTAL
189 Mother Pre-pregnancy SODIUM
190 Mother Pre-pregnancy RBC
191 Mother 24-40 weeks BASO %
192 Mother 24-40 weeks LYMPHOCYTES abs-DIF
193 Mother 0-12 weeks PROGESTERONE
194 Father BMI count
195 Mother Pre-pregnancy TRIGLYCERIDES
196 Father max Cholesterol
197 Mother 12-24 weeks LYMP.abs
198 Mother last Diastolic Blood Pressure 0-12 weeks
199 Mother Pre-pregnancy GLOBULIN
200 Mother 24-40 weeks CREATININE
201 Father max Cholesterol-ldl calc
202 Father max Cholesterol- hdl
203 Mother Pre-pregnancy ESR
204 Mother 12-24 weeks PT-SEC
205 Mother 24-40 weeks LUC abs
206 Mother 24-40 weeks MPXI
207 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI std
208 Mother 12-24 weeks FERRITIN
209 Mother 0-12 weeks MPXI
210 Mother 0-12 weeks TSH
211 Mother 24-40 weeks GOT (AST)
212 Mother 24-40 weeks HYPER %
213 Mother 24-40 weeks EOSINOPHILS abs-DIF
214 Mother 12-24 weeks WBC
215 Father mean Cholesterol-ldl calc
216 Father std Triglycerides
217 Mother Pre-pregnancy HDW
218 Mother 0-12 weeks UREA
219 Mother 12-24 weeks HCT
220 Mother Pre-pregnancy HEPATITIS Bs Ab
221 Mother 0-12 weeks LDH
222 Mother 12-24 weeks POTASSIUM
223 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight std
224 Mother 12-24 weeks MICRO %
225 Mother Pre-pregnancy BILIRUBIN TOTAL
226 Mother 0-12 weeks HB
227 Mother Pre-pregnancy C-REACTIVE PROTEIN
228 Mother Pre-pregnancy MCV
229 Mother Pre-pregnancy DHEA SULPHATE
230 Father min Cholesterol
231 Mother Pre-pregnancy EOS %
232 Father median Cholesterol
233 Mother 24-40 weeks BILIRUBIN-DIRECT
234 Mother 24-40 weeks STABS %-DIF
235 Siblings at 5 years of age BMI zscore std
236 Father std Cholesterol- hdl
237 Mother 12-24 weeks HYPO %
238 Mother 24-40 weeks STABS abs-DIF
239 Mother 0-12 weeks LUC %
240 Mother 12-24 weeks SODIUM
241 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE (GTT) 60′
242 Mother 24-40 weeks CHOLESTEROL
243 No. of Siblings with BMI data
244 Mother 12-24 weeks CREATININE
245 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE (GTT) 180′
246 Mother 12-24 weeks EOS.abs
247 Mother Pre-pregnancy COMPLEMENT C3
248 Mother Pre-pregnancy EOS.abs
249 Mother 24-40 weeks T3- FREE
250 Mother Pre-pregnancy FERRITIN
251 Mother Pre-pregnancy AMYLASE
252 Father count Pravastatin
253 Mother 24-40 weeks MONOCYTES abs-DIF
254 Mother 24-40 weeks GPT (ALT)
255 Mother Pre-pregnancy URIC ACID
256 Father diagnosed Obesity, unspecified
257 Mother 24-40 weeks NEUTROPHILS %-DIF
258 Mother 0-12 weeks MCHC
259 Mother 12-24 weeks MONO %
260 Mother Pre-pregnancy FIBRINOGEN CALCU
261 Mother Pre-pregnancy MPXI
262 Mother 0-12 weeks URIC ACID
263 Mother Pre-pregnancy LH
264 Mother 24-40 weeks MACRO %
265 Mother Pre-pregnancy MCH
266 Mother 24-40 weeks BASO abs
267 Father count Cholesterol-ldl calc
268 Mother 0-12 weeks MICRO %
269 Mother Weight delta Pre-pregnancy to 0-12 weeks
270 Siblings std BMI zscore std
271 Mother 24-40 weeks LDH
272 Mother 0-12 weeks PLT
273 Siblings at 13 years of age BMI zscore std
274 Father count Glucose
275 Mother Pre-pregnancy BILIRUBIN INDIRECT
276 Mother 24-40 weeks URIC ACID
277 Mother BMI delta Pre-pregnancy to 0-12 weeks
278 Mother 12-24 weeks GGT
279 Mother 0-12 weeks GPT (ALT)
280 Mother 0-12 weeks PHOSPHORUS
281 Mother Pre-pregnancy LUC %
282 Mother 0-12 weeks HYPER %
283 Mother 0-12 weeks CREATININE
284 Mother 12-24 weeks MICRO %/HYPO %
285 Mother 0-12 weeks MACRO %
286 Mother 12-24 weeks RDW
287 Mother Pre-pregnancy POTASSIUM
288 Mother 0-12 weeks RBC
289 Mother Pre-pregnancy ALK. PHOSPHATASE
290 Mother Pre-pregnancy ALBUMIN
291 Mother 12-24 weeks TRIGLYCERIDES
292 Mother 0-12 weeks AMYLASE
293 Father min Cholesterol-ldl calc
294 Mother 0-12 weeks ALK. PHOSPHATASE
295 Mother Pre-pregnancy PT-SEC
296 Mother 0-12 weeks VITAMIN D (25-OH)
297 Mother 12-24 weeks MCH
298 Mother Pre-pregnancy CALCIUM
299 Father count Cholesterol- hdl
300 Father median Cholesterol-ldl calc
301 Mother Pre-pregnancy COMPLEMENT C4
302 Mother count Ofloxacin
303 Mother last Weight 24-40 weeks
304 Mother 0-12 weeks CHOLESTEROL-LDL calc
305 Mother Pre-pregnancy MACRO %
306 Mother count Phenoxymethylpenicillin
307 Mother 0-12 weeks HDW
308 Mother 24-40 weeks TRIGLYCERIDES
309 Mother Pre-pregnancy TESTOSTERONE- TOTAL
310 Father std Non-hdl_cholesterol
311 Mother 0-12 weeks NON-HDL_CHOLESTEROL
312 Mother last Diastolic Blood Pressure Pre-pregnancy
313 Mother 0-12 weeks APTT-sec
314 Mother 24-40 weeks MICRO %/HYPO %
315 Mother 12-24 weeks MPXI
316 Mother 0-12 weeks BASO %
317 Father min Non-hdl_cholesterol
318 Mother Pre-pregnancy NON-HDL_CHOLESTEROL
319 Mother 0-12 weeks GLOBULIN
320 Mother 12-24 weeks MACRO %
321 Father count Simvastatin
322 Mother 12-24 weeks LUC abs
323 Mother 12-24 weeks PT-INR
324 Mother 0-12 weeks GOT (AST)
325 Father min Cholesterol/hdl
326 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE
327 Mother 24-40 weeks EOS.abs
328 Mother 12-24 weeks UREA
329 Mother 0-12 weeks PROTEIN-TOTAL
330 Mother Pre-pregnancy ALY
331 Mother Pre-pregnancy FREE ANDROGEN INDEX
332 Mother 0-12 weeks POTASSIUM
333 Mother 12-24 weeks AMYLASE
334 Mother 12-24 weeks CK—CREAT.KINASE(CPK)
335 Mother Pre-pregnancy GPT (ALT)
336 Mother 0-12 weeks CHOLESTEROL
337 Mother 12-24 weeks BASO %
338 Mother Pre-pregnancy CORTISOL-BLOOD
339 Mother 24-40 weeks RDW-CV
340 Mother Pre-pregnancy ESTRADIOL (E-2)
341 Mother 12-24 weeks MPV
342 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROLACTIN
343 Mother 24-40 weeks TSH
344 is Male
345 Mother 0-12 weeks CK—CREAT.KINASE(CPK)
346 Father median Non-hdl_cholesterol
347 Father mean Cholesterol/hdl
348 Mother 0-12 weeks FOLIC ACID
349 Mother 24-40 weeks IRON
350 Mother 0-12 weeks LUC abs
351 Mother Pre-pregnancy RUBELLA Ab IgG
352 Mother 0-12 weeks ALBUMIN
353 Mother 0-12 weeks IRON
354 Mother 0-12 weeks RUBELLA Ab IgG
355 Mother 24-40 weeks AMYLASE
356 Number of twin siblings
357 Mother Pre-pregnancy ANDROSTENEDIONE
358 Father count Enalapril
359 Mother count Mebendazole
360 Mother 24-40 weeks CHLORIDE
361 Mother 24-40 weeks HDW
362 Mother 24-40 weeks GLUCOSE (GTT) 120′
363 Father count Cholesterol
364 Mother 12-24 weeks PCT
365 Mother 24-40 weeks UREA
366 Mother 0-12 weeks TOXOPLASMA IgG
367 Mother Pre-pregnancy MICRO %/HYPO %
368 Mother 24-40 weeks PROTEIN-TOTAL
369 Mother 12-24 weeks TOXOPLASMA IgG
370 Mother 0-12 weeks FSH
371 Father count Non-hdl_cholesterol
372 Mother 24-40 weeks CHOLESTEROL- HDL
373 Mother 24-40 weeks PT-SEC
374 Mother Pre-pregnancy ANTI CARDIOLIPIN IgG
375 Mother Pre-Pregnancy BMI count
376 Mother 24-40 weeks PDW
377 Mother 24-40 weeks MONOCYTES %-DIF
378 Mother 0-12 weeks MICRO %/HYPO %
379 Mother Pre-pregnancy TRANSFERRIN
380 Mother Pre-pregnancy GOT (AST)
381 Mother Pre-pregnancy PT-INR
382 Mother 24-40 weeks CALCIUM
383 Mother 0-12 weeks HEMOGLOBIN A
384 Mother Pre-pregnancy LUC abs
385 Father count Amlodipine
386 Mother 12-24 weeks ALK. PHOSPHATASE
387 Father count Triglycerides
388 Mother 0-12 weeks CALCIUM
389 Mother 12-24 weeks FOLIC ACID
390 Mother Pre-pregnancy FSH
391 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHOLESTEROL- HDL
392 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROGESTERONE
393 Mother 0-12 weeks T4- FREE
394 Mother 12-24 weeks BASO abs
395 Mother Pre-pregnancy ANTITHROMBIN-III
396 Mother 24-40 weeks TOXOPLASMA IgG
397 Mother 0-12 weeks PT-SEC
398 Mother Pre-pregnancy CONTROL PTT
399 Mother 24-40 weeks EOSINOPHILS %-DIF
400 Mother Pre-pregnancy 17-OH-PROGESTERONE
401 Father count Cholesterol/hdl
402 Mother Pre-pregnancy IRON
403 Mother Pre-pregnancy HEMOGLOBIN A1C %
404 Mother 12-24 weeks HYPER %
405 Mother 0-12 weeks BASO abs
406 Mother Pre-pregnancy APTT-sec
407 Mother count Fluticasone
408 Mother 24-40 weeks HCT/HGB Ratio
409 Father count Bezafibrate
410 Father diagnosed Obesity (bmi >30)
411 Mother count Omeprazole
412 Mother 24-40 weeks PT-INR
413 Mother Pre-pregnancy HCT/HGB Ratio
414 Mother Pre-Pregnancy Weight count
415 Mother count Estradiol
416 Mother 24-40 weeks PCT
417 Mother Pre-pregnancy T3-TOTAL
418 Mother count Follitropin alfa
419 Mother 24-40 weeks PT %
420 Mother Pre-pregnancy VLDL
421 Mother 24-40 weeks POTASSIUM
422 Mother 12-24 weeks HbF
423 Mother 24-40 weeks BILIRUBIN INDIRECT
424 Mother 24-40 weeks GLOM.FILTR.RATE
425 Mother 24-40 weeks PHOSPHORUS
426 Father max Cholesterol/hdl
427 Mother Pre-pregnancy ALY %
428 Mother 0-12 weeks PT %
429 Mother 12-24 weeks PT %
430 Mother 24-40 weeks TRANSFERRIN
431 Father Weight count
432 Mother Pre-pregnancy T3- FREE
433 Mother 12-24 weeks PROTEIN-TOTAL
434 Mother Pre-pregnancy BASO abs
435 Mother 0-12 weeks T3- FREE
436 Mother Pre-pregnancy RDW-CV
437 Mother count Levothyroxine sodium
438 Mother 12-24 weeks ALBUMIN
439 Mother 12-24 weeks CHOLESTEROL
440 Mother 24-40 weeks MAGNESIUM
441 Mother 0-12 weeks PDW
442 Mother 0-12 weeks TRANSFERRIN
443 Mother 24-40 weeks HbA2
444 Mother 12-24 weeks T3- FREE
445 Mother count Aspirin
446 Mother 0-12 weeks BLOOD TYPE
447 Mother count Human menopausal gonadotrophin
448 Mother count Co-amoxiclav cd
449 Mother 24-40 weeks T4- FREE
450 Mother 0-12 weeks DHEA SULPHATE
451 Mother 0-12 weeks PROLACTIN
452 Mother 24-40 weeks LYMPHOCYTES %-DIF
453 Mother 0-12 weeks FERRITIN
454 Mother count Symbicort/duoresp
455 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROTEIN C ACTIVITY
456 Mother 0-12 weeks HCT/HGB Ratio
457 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHOLESTEROL/HDL
458 Mother 12-24 weeks NORMOBLAST.abs
459 Father median Cholesterol/hdl
460 Mother 24-40 weeks ALBUMIN
461 Mother last Diastolic Blood Pressure 12-24 weeks
462 Mother 0-12 weeks RDW-CV
463 Mother 12-24 weeks URIC ACID
464 Apidoral given at birth
465 Mother 12-24 weeks BILIRUBIN TOTAL
466 Mother 0-12 weeks BILIRUBIN TOTAL
467 Father diagnosed Other and unspecified hyperlipidemia
468 Mother Pre-pregnancy ANTI CARDIOLIPIN IgM
469 Mother 24-40 weeks APTT-sec
470 Mother 24-40 weeks VITAMIN D (25-OH)
471 Mother 24-40 weeks GLOBULIN
472 Mother Pre-pregnancy CA-125
473 Mother count Cetirizine
474 Mother 12-24 weeks APTT-sec
475 Mother 12-24 weeks LDH
476 Mother 24-40 weeks CK—CREAT.KINASE(CPK)
477 Mother 0-12 weeks BILIRUBIN-DIRECT
478 Mother 12-24 weeks GPT (ALT)
479 Mother Pre-pregnancy APTT-R
480 Mother 24-40 weeks FIBRINOGEN CALCU
481 Mother 12-24 weeks NORMOBLAST.%
482 Mother 0-12 weeks CHOLESTEROL- HDL
483 Mother count Desogestrel
484 Mother Pre-pregnancy EOSINOPHILS %-DIF
485 Mother 24-40 weeks FOLIC ACID
486 Mother Pre-pregnancy IgA
487 Mother Pre-pregnancy PROT-S ANTIGEN (FREE
488 Mother count Lansoprazole
489 Mother 12-24 weeks CHOLESTEROL-LDL calc
490 Mother 12-24 weeks ALPHA FETOPROTEIN TM
491 Mother 12-24 weeks GLUCOSE 50 g
492 Mother 0-12 weeks HbF
493 Mother BMI delta 0-12 weeks to 12-24 weeks
494 Mother 0-12 weeks BILIRUBIN INDIRECT
495 Mother Weight delta 12-24 weeks to 24-40 weeks
496 Mother count Cefuroxime
497 Mother 12-24 weeks CALCIUM
498 Father diagnosed Essential hypertension
499 Mother Pre-pregnancy MONOCYTES abs-DIF
500 Mother 12-24 weeks RDW-CV
501 Mother 0-12 weeks PCT
502 Mother Pre-pregnancy LYMPHOCYTES %-DIF
503 Mother 24-40 weeks NORMOBLAST.abs
504 Mother Pre-pregnancy FIBRINOGEN
505 Mother count Cefalexin
506 Mother Pre-pregnancy CHLORIDE
507 Mother count Progesterone
508 Mother 12-24 weeks GOT (AST)
509 Mother 12-24 weeks PDW
510 Father diagnosed Morbid obesity
511 Mother Pre-pregnancy BLOOD TYPE
512 Mother 0-12 weeks HbA2
513 Mother Weight delta 0-12 weeks to 12-24 weeks
514 Mother 24-40 weeks NON-HDL_CHOLESTEROL
515 Mother 12-24 weeks HDW
516 Mother Pre-pregnancy GLOM.FILTR.RATE
517 Premature birth
518 Mother Pre-pregnancy VITAMIN D (25-OH)
519 Mother 24-40 weeks CHOLESTEROL-LDL calc
520 Mother 12-24 weeks CHLORIDE
521 Born in Israel
522 Mother 12-24 weeks CHOLESTEROL- HDL
523 Mother Pre-pregnancy HbA2
524 Mother 0-12 weeks CHLORIDE
525 Mother Pre-pregnancy LIC
526 Mother 24-40 weeks NORMOBLAST.%
527 Mother 0-12 weeks NORMOBLAST.%
528 Mother Pre-pregnancy NORMOBLAST.%
529 Mother Pre-pregnancy LIC %
530 Mother 24-40 weeks LI
531 Mother Pre-pregnancy NEUTROPHILS abs-DIF
532 Mother Pre-pregnancy TOXOPLASMA IgG
533 Mother 24-40 weeks CONTROL PTT
534 Mother 12-24 weeks NON-HDL_CHOLESTEROL
535 Mother Pre-pregnancy HbF
536 Mother Pre-pregnancy NEUTROPHILS %-DIF
537 Father Height count
538 Mother Pre-pregnancy MONOCYTES %-DIF
539 Mother Pre-pregnancy LYMPHOCYTES abs-DIF
540 Mother 12-24 weeks PHOSPHORUS
541 Mother 12-24 weeks HbA
542 Mother Pre-pregnancy HEMOGLOBIN A
543 Mother 24-40 weeks GGT
544 Mother 12-24 weeks BILIRUBIN-DIRECT
545 Mother 0-12 weeks HbA
546 Mother 24-40 weeks FIBRINOGEN
547 Mother 0-12 weeks NORMOBLAST.abs
548 Mother count Carbamazepine
549 Mother count Norgestimate and ethinylestradiol
550 Mother count Norethisterone
551 Mother count Nitrofurantoin
552 Mother count Metronidazole
553 Mother count Methylphenidate
554 Mother count Medroxyprogesterone
555 Mother count Loratadine
556 Mother count Ipratropium bromide
557 Mother count Gestodene and ethinylestradiol
558 Mother count Follitropin beta
559 Mother count Fluoxetine
560 Mother count Fluconazole
561 Mother count Fexofenadine
562 Mother count Famotidine
563 Mother count Escitalopram
564 Mother 0-12 weeks PT-INR
565 Mother count Dydrogesterone
566 Mother count Drospirenone and ethinylestradiol
567 Mother count Doxycycline
568 Mother count Dexamethasone
569 Mother count Desogestrel and ethinylestradiol
570 Mother count Desloratadine
571 Mother count Colchicine
572 Mother count Clonazepam
573 Mother count Clomifene
574 Mother count Clarithromycin
575 Mother count Citalopram
576 Mother count Ciprofloxacin
577 Mother count Chorionic gonadotrophin
578 Mother count Paroxetine
579 Mother count Prednisone
580 Mother 12-24 weeks TRANSFERRIN
581 Mother count Progyluton cd
582 Mother count Triptorelin
583 Mother count Simvastatin
584 Mother count Sertraline
585 Mother count Seretide cd
586 Mother count Salbutamol
587 Mother count Choriogonadotropin alfa
588 Mother count Budesonide
589 Mother 12-24 weeks GLOBULIN
590 Mother 12-24 weeks BILIRUBIN INDIRECT
591 Father count Rosuvastatin
592 Father count Ramipril-hydrochlorothiazide cd
593 Father count Ramipril
594 Father count Propranolol
595 Father count Nifedipine-cd
596 Father count Nifedipine
597 Father count Metformin and sitagliptin cd
598 Mother 0-12 weeks GLOM.FILTR.RATE
599 Father count Insulin glargine
600 Father count Bisoprolol
601 Father count Atorvastatin
602 Father count Atenolol
603 Mother 12-24 weeks RUBELLA Ab IgG
604 Mother Pre-pregnancy NORMOBLAST.abs
605 Mother 0-12 weeks ESR
606 Mother count Bethamethasone
607 Mother count Anti-d (rh) immunoglobulin
608 Mother count Aciclovir
609 Mother 12-24 weeks BLOOD TYPE
610 Mother 24-40 weeks BLOOD TYPE
611 Mother 12-24 weeks HCT/HGB Ratio
612 Father diagnosed Unspecified essential hypertension
613 Father diagnosed Overweight (bmi <30)
614 Father diagnosed Other abnormal glucose
615 Father diagnosed Lipid metabolism disorder
616 Father diagnosed Impaired fasting glucose
617 Father diagnosed Disorders of lipoid metabolism
618 Father diagnosed Diabetes mellitus without mention of
complication
619 Father diagnosed Adult-onset type diabetes mellitus whithout
complication
620 Mother count Lamotrigine

Table 1.3 presents a list of 66 response parameters from which parameter to be included in questionnaire can be selected when the subject is an infant or toddler subject. The questionnaire can presented to a person on behalf of the subject, and can provide response parameters for feeing the machine learning procedure. The list is sorted according the significance of the respective feature for predicting the likelihood for childhood obesity, in descending order, so that from the standpoint of prediction accuracy it is more preferred to select a parameter that is listed higher in Table 1.3, than a parameter that is listed lower in Table 1.3. For example, when N parameters are used, it is preferred to select those parameters from lines 1 through M of Table 1.3, where N≤M≤66.

TABLE 1.3
No. Parameter
1 Last WFL zscore
2 Siblings mean BMI zscore mean
3 Father BMI mean
4 Weight Routine checkup - 18-22 months
5 Weight Routine checkup - 12-16 months
6 Weight Routine checkup - 4-6 months
7 Ethnicity: North Africa
8 Weight Routine checkup - 9-12 months
9 WFL Routine checkup - 18-22 months
10 WFL Routine checkup - 12-16 months
11 WFL Routine checkup - 1-2 months
12 Mother last BMI Pre-pregnancy
13 Date of Birth
14 WFL Routine checkup - 9-12 months
15 Age of Father at birth
16 Siblings mean BMI zscore std
17 Age of Mother at birth
18 Ethnicity: West Europe
19 Weight Routine checkup - 6-9 months
20 WFL Routine checkup - 4-6 months
21 Father Weight mean
22 WFL Routine checkup - 2-3 months
23 Mother last BMI 0-12 weeks
24 Mother last Weight Pre-pregnancy
25 Ethnicity: North America
26 Mother last BMI 24-40 weeks
27 No. of Siblings with BMI data
28 Weight Routine checkup - 2-3 months
29 Ethnicity: Unknown
30 WFL Routine checkup - 6-9 months
31 Height Routine checkup - 12-16 months
32 Ethnicity: Ethiopia
33 Height Routine checkup - 18-22 months
34 Ethnicity: East Europe
35 Week of year bom
36 Birth weight
37 Mother last BMI 12-24 weeks
38 Weight Routine checkup - 1-2 months
39 Height Routine checkup - 9-12 months
40 Age at last WFL
41 Age at Target measurement
42 Mother last Weight 12-24 weeks
43 Height Routine checkup - 2-3 months
44 Height Routine checkup - 6-9 months
45 Ethnicity: Iraq
46 Ethnicity: Muslim Arab
47 Height Routine checkup - 4-6 months
48 Mother BMI delta 12-24 weeks to 24-40 weeks
49 Height Routine checkup - 1-2 months
50 Mother last Weight 0-12 weeks
51 Ethnicity: Iran
52 Mother BMI delta Pre-pregnancy to 0-12 weeks
53 Mother last Weight 24-40 weeks
54 Mother Weight delta Pre-pregnancy to 0-12 weeks
55 Ethnicity: Asian
56 Ethnicity: Yemen
57 is Male
58 Mother Weight delta 0-12 weeks to 12-24 weeks
59 Ethnicity: USSR
60 Ethnicity: Mediterranean
61 Mother Weight delta 12-24 weeks to 24-40 weeks
62 Mother BMI delta 0-12 weeks to 12-24 weeks
63 Ethnicity: Latin America
64 Born in Israel
65 Premature birth
66 Ethnicity: Africa

Table 1.4 presents a list of 21 response parameters from which parameter to be included in questionnaire can be selected when the subject is an unborn subject. The questionnaire can presented to a person on behalf of the subject, and can provide response parameters for feeing the machine learning procedure. The list is sorted according the significance of the respective feature for predicting the likelihood for childhood obesity, in descending order, so that from the standpoint of prediction accuracy it is more preferred to select a parameter that is listed higher in Table 1.4, than a parameter that is listed lower in Table 1.4. For example, when N parameters are used, it is preferred to select those parameters from lines 1 through M of Table 1.4, where N≤M≤21.

TABLE 1.4
No. Parameter
1 Siblings mean BMI zscore mean
2 Father BMI mean
3 Mother last BMI Pre-pregnancy
4 Age of Father at birth
5 Siblings mean BMI zscore std
6 Age of Mother at birth
7 Father Weight mean
8 Mother last BMI 0-12 weeks
9 Mother last Weight Pre-pregnancy
10 Mother last BMI 24-40 weeks
11 No. of Siblings with BMI data
12 Mother last BMI 12-24 weeks
13 Mother last Weight 12-24 weeks
14 Mother BMI delta 12-24 weeks to 24-40 weeks
15 Mother last Weight 0-12 weeks
16 Mother BMI delta Pre-pregnancy to 0-12 weeks
17 Mother last Weight 24-40 weeks
18 Mother Weight delta Pre-pregnancy to 0-12 weeks
19 Mother Weight delta 0-12 weeks to 12-24 weeks
20 Mother Weight delta 12-24 weeks to 24-40 weeks
21 Mother BMI delta 0-12 weeks to 12-24 weeks

Example 2

This Example describes analysis of data collected over a decade from Israel's largest healthcare provider, to assess risk factors for pediatric obesity and to develop a model for assessing children's obesity risk in order to inform and target interventions. The inventors analyzed nationwide electronic health records of children from 2006 to 2018 for whom sequential anthropometric data were available. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI)≥95th percentile for age and gender. Data of children and their families included anthropometric measurements, drug prescriptions, medical diagnoses, demographic data and laboratory tests.

Analysis of BMI trajectories among 382,132 adolescents revealed that among obese adolescents, the largest annual increase in BMI percentile occurs at 2-5 years of age. Therefore, the inventors devised a computational model based on data of 136,196 children from birth up to 2 years of age for predicting obesity at 5-6 years of age and from birth and up to 2 years of age. Most (51%) obese children in our cohort had a normal weight at infancy. As will be shown below, the model predicted obesity with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auROC) and 95% CI of 0.803 [0.796−0.812]. Discrimination results on different subpopulations demonstrated its robustness across a clinically heterogeneous pediatric population. The most influential features included anthropometric measurements of the child and the family. Other impactful features included ethnicity and maternal pregnancy glucose measurements. A model based solely on features that are available pre-birth had similar performance to a model based on the child's last available weight and length measurements.

Methods

Study Design and Population

Extracted features included maternal, paternal and siblings' data. FIG. 3 illustrates the dataset used in the present Example. The dataset contained 1,449,442 children who have at least one measurement in a routine medical infant checkup which is scheduled for all Israeli infants at ages 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. Of them, 643,463 children have an additional measurement between 5 and 6 years of age, which was defined as the outcome for the machine learning procedure. 136,196 children who have at least 2 different routine checkup measurements in addition to the 5-6 years old outcome measurement were included in the cohort. 90,270 children included in the cohort have maternal data, 92,152 have paternal data and 70,735 have data of at least one sibling.

Features

All EHR data available were binned into time periods and statistical measures (e.g., median, max, slope) were taken as features for each period. Pharmaceutical prescriptions and clinical diagnoses were categorized by ATC codes (Anon n.d.) and ICD9 diagnosis codes, respectively, and counts in different time periods were taken as features. Weight, height, Weight-for-Length (WFL) and BMI data were converted to reference z-scores provided by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Barlow and Expert Committee 2007). Valid measurements were defined as being in the range of 5 CDC standard deviation scores for weight and height. Features from maternal pregnancy were binned in alignment with the routine pregnancy tests schedule in Israel. Specific features of interest such as antibiotic prescriptions, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status surrogates were devised manually based on domain knowledge. Altogether, 943 features were devised for each child.

The characteristics of the Study Cohort and features used are summarized in Table 2.1, below.

TABLE 2.1
Train set Temporal test set
(n = 108,416) (n = 27,780)
aged 5 before 2017 aged 5 at 2017 All
Children (n = 136,196)
Obesity status at 5-6 years Underweight 13,635 3,304 16,939
of age Normal weight 75,648 19,867 95,515
Overweight 19,133 4,609 23,742
Obese 8,120 1,941 10,061
Sex Female 52,733 13,458 66,191
Male 55,683 14,322 70,005
Children with maternal data (n = 90,270)
Maternal age at childbirth mean (std) 30.1 (5.2) 30.5 (5.2) 30.1 (5.2)
[years]
Pre-pregnancy BMI mean (std) 23.6 (4.7) 23.3 (4.4) 23.5 (4.6)
[m/kg2]
Children with paternal data (n = 92,152)
Paternal age [years] mean (std) 33.1 (5.9) 33.3 (5.7) 33.2 (5.9)
Paternal BMI [m/kg2] mean (std) 25.9 (4.4) 25.6 (4.2) 25.9 (4.3)
Children with Siblings data (n = 70,735)
Number of children with count 55070 15665 70735
siblings data
Number of siblings per mean (std)  1.1 (1.3)  1.3 (1.4)  1.2 (1.3)
child
Sibling BMI CDC z-score mean (std)  0.0 (1.1) −0.1 (1.1)  0.0 (1.1)

Outcome

The outcome for the models was the obesity status of children at 5 to 6 years of age. Obesity status was defined in accordance with health care professionals in Israel, using the CDC BMI reference percentiles. Cutoffs for normal weight, overweight, and obesity were determined using the CDC's standard thresholds of the 85th percentile for overweight and 95th percentile for obesity. Using other percentiles curves such as, but not limited to, the World Health Organization (WHO) WFL, and WHO BMI provided similar estimates of obesity risk as the CDC percentiles at 5 years of age.

Statistical Analysis

Childhood Obesity Prediction Model

In this Example, Gradient Boosting trees were trained for providing the prediction. Trees allow nonlinear and multiple feature interactions to be captured, which may be important in obtaining an accurate prediction model. The parameters of the model were tuned using cross-validation on the training set. As stringent tests, both temporal and geographical validations were used, thus testing the performance of the model for distribution shifts over time and geographic location. The temporal validation set contained the most recent year in which the data were available. The geographical validation set contained all the clinics in the most populated and multiethnic city in Israel, Jerusalem. Unless stated otherwise, the reported results are on the temporal validation sets. Full results on both validation sets are available in Table 2.2, below.

As a baseline model for comparison the last WFL percentile routine checkup measurement available before 2 years of age was used, as current guidelines recommend that clinicians assess a child's current nutritional and obesity status by calculating WFL percentile or BMI percentile in children 0 to 2 years of age, or older than 2 years of age, respectively (Daniels et al. 2015). The WFL percentile thus emulates the information a caregiver has today to assess the current obesity status and future obesity risk of children younger than 2 years of age (Taveras et al. 2009). This variable also contains information of sex and age, as it standardizes by them. This variable itself is a predictor of the outcome, achieving an auROC of 0.749 and auPR of 0.223, and acts as a baseline to compare and improve upon.

Risk Factors Analysis from the Prediction Model

Risk factors were investigated by analyzing which features attribute to the model's prediction. To this end, the recently introduced SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanation) method (Lundberg and Lee 2017; Lundberg et al. 2018) was used. The SHAP interprets the output of a machine learning model. A feature's Shapley value represents the average change in the model's output by conditioning on that feature when introducing features one at a time over all feature orderings. Shapley values were calculated individually for every child's feature. A property of Shapley values is that they are additive, meaning that the Shapley values of a child's features add up to the predicted log-odds of obesity for that child. In this Example, this value was transformed for each feature and each child to obtain a relative risk score.

Feature attributions were thus analyzed at the individual level, by examining plots of the Shapley value as a function of the feature value for all individuals. This method allowed capturing non-linear and continuous relations between a feature's impact on the prediction and the feature's value. A vertical spread in such a plot implies interaction with other features in the model, which would not have been attainable using a linear model. Building a model with many correlated features (e.g., a child's weight measurement at adjacent time points) is bound to suffer from severe collinearity of the features, and consequently the feature attributions will be spread across these related features. To tackle this, the additive property of Shapley values was used. Adding up the Shapely values of related features provided an analysis on this group of features. This provided better estimates of relevant risk scores. Another use of the additive property allows adding features according to groups and analyzing the model globally by taking the mean over absolute Shapely values of all children in each group of features. This gives insight on the impact of a feature group.

Results

Acceleration of BMI in Early Childhood

BMI trajectories were first analyzed in early childhood in relation to obesity status at 13-14 years of age. A total of 382,132 children with 1,401,803 measurements were included in the analysis (FIGS. 4A and 4B). The mean change in BMI z-score of children who were not obese at 13 years of age remained close to 0 from 1 year of age, with an annual change of less than 0.1 z-scores. However, for obese children at 13 years of age, the BMI z-score incremented throughout infancy and early childhood with the largest annual increase in BMI percentile observed at 2-5 years of age. A model has therefore been developed in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention to identify children at high risk for obesity within the subsequent 3-4 years at 2 years of age, prior to this critical time period.

The transition of obesity status over the first 6 years of life for the 136,196 children that were included in our cohort was analyzed. Obesity status was defined for each child at two time-points: the last available routine checkup before 2 years of age and at 5-6 years of age (FIG. 4C). This analysis revealed that most obese children at 5-6 years of age had normal weight at infancy (51%) (FIG. 4D).

Prediction of Childhood Obesity at 5-6 Years of Age

In accordance with some embodiments of the present invention, a model was constructed for predicting the likelihood for children at 0-2 years of age to develop childhood obesity at 5 to 6 years of age. The discrimination performance of the model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating (auROC) and precision-recall (auPR) curves (FIGS. 5A and 5C). As shown, the technique of the present embodiments outperforms the baseline model based on the child's last WFL percentile. Both temporal and geographical validation results are summarized in Table 2.2, below.

The model of the present embodiments outputs calibrated continuous risk probabilities. Applying a clinical decision thereafter (for example, a nutritional intervention) can vary between individuals and depend on the costs and benefits of the action, both clinically and economically. Decision curves (Vickers and Elkin 2006) offer a graphical tool to analyze clinical utility of adopting a new risk prediction model. The curves contain information that can guide clinicians to make decisions based on the risk thresholds, and based on the tradeoffs (costs and benefits) of their decision to treat. The costs and benefits can be translated into a function of the optimal threshold probability. In this Example, clinical utility was analyzed by constructing decision curves (FIG. 5D). As shown, the model of the present embodiments dominates over other strategies in net benefit over all threshold probabilities, with significant margins in the lower threshold probability regime. A summary of the effect of applying different decision thresholds on the model performance is presented in Table 2.2, below.

The discrimination results (auPR) of the model of the present embodiments were further analyzed on different subpopulations of children (FIGS. 6A-C). The effect of gender on the performance of the model was evaluated. Similar results for boys and girls were found. Children who had at least one diagnosis of a complex chronic condition were evaluated using a previously defined classification system (Feudtner et al. 2014). The discrimination of the model was similar in this group, demonstrating the robustness of the model of the present embodiments across a clinically heterogeneous pediatric population. Discrimination performance was also evaluated by obesity status as defined by the last available child percentile prior to 2 years of age. The model of the present embodiments had the highest auPR in children who were obese at infancy, followed by overweight and normal weight at infancy. The model of the present embodiments outperformed the baseline model in predicting future obesity in all infants, regardless of obesity status at baseline (FIG. 6B). An increase in the number of documented anthropometric measurements during routine checkups improved the discrimination performance of the model.

As earlier detection of childhood obesity may be more beneficial and allow earlier interventions, the ability to construct a prediction model for childhood obesity at the age 5-6 years of age was analyzed in the following time points: pre-birth, birth, 6 months, 1 year and 1.5 years of age. The effect of the child's age at prediction and the model discrimination performance is presented in FIG. 8A. As shown, the model performance improved when the prediction is done at an older age, which is closer to the target age of the predictor. Note that a prediction model constructed pre-birth has an auROC of 0.708 and auPR of 0.176, very similar to the performance of the baseline model based on the child's own weight and length measurements at 1 years of age which has an auROC of 0.709 and auPR of 0.166. The model of the present embodiments thus outperformed the baseline model in the entire age range.

Features Attribution

An analysis of feature attributions was performed using Shapley values. The results of the analysis are shown in FIGS. 7A-H. FIG. 7A presents a global analysis of the model's features attributions. The mean of absolute summation of Shapley values for different groups of features is presented for the entire cohort. Feature importance dependence plots of the Shapley value were also examined as a function of the feature value for all individuals. Most of the influential features were previous anthropometric measurements of the child, with the last measured WFL percentile being the most impactful feature (FIG. 7C). Anthropometric features of parents and siblings and North African Jewish descendancy also had a significant impact on the prediction (FIGS. 7A, 7D, 7E and 7H). Interestingly, maternal blood glucose on 50 g glucose tolerance tests (GTT) were also influential for the prediction of obesity at 5-6 years of age (FIG. 7F). Relative risk for obesity has increased monotonically across all the maternal glucose spectrum and increased above 1 in values above 100 mg/dL.

Analysis of the relative importance of different groups of features at different ages of applying the predictor revealed that the most influential features at birth are anthropometric measurements of the siblings, mother and father. Following these, the influence of the child's own anthropometrics measurements becomes more substantial and is roughly equal to the contribution of all other features in 1 years of age. Laboratory tests, drugs prescriptions and diagnoses have smaller relative influence, which decreases as the data on the child's anthropometrics accumulates (FIG. 8B).

Using information on pharmaceutical prescriptions, the effect of in utero and early life antibiotic exposure was also analyzed. 83,627 children (80%) had at least one antibiotic prescription in the first 2 years of life. The analysis revealed that antibiotic exposure in utero and in the first two years of life and age of first exposure to antibiotic had no effect on obesity risk at 5-6 years of age (FIG. 7G).

Prediction Model Based on a Smaller Number of Parameters

Based on the observation that infant routine checkups, family anthropometric measurements, and ethnicity contribute most to the predictive power of the model, a simple prediction model was established based on a set of self-assessed questions that parents can easily fill out at different time points up to 2 years of age in order to assess their child's risk of obesity. This model achieved an auROC of 0.798 and auPR of 0.296, compared to 0.749 and 0.223, respectively, for the baseline model.

Discussion

This Example demonstrates a diagnostic prediction model for pediatric obesity at 5-6 years of age based on a comprehensive nationwide EHR encompassing over 10 years of children and familial data. Overweight 5-year-olds are four times more likely to become obese later in life compared to normal-weight children, and weight in this age is considered to be a good indicator of the child's future metabolic health. The target age of prediction model presented in this Example is also supported by a recently published observation on children BMI trajectories (Geserick et al. 2018), which was also replicated in our cohort, showing 2 to 6 years of age as the maximal BMI acceleration time period. The model is therefore designed to identify children at risk prior to this critical time window, in which mature eating patterns become more developed as children reduce breast milk or formula consumption. In addition, the analysis of the transition in obesity status in the first 6 years of life revealed that most obese children had normal weight at infancy, underscoring the importance of building a tool that allows clinicians to identify high risk infants that are considered to have a normal weight at infancy but will develop obesity, as they will constitute the majority of obese children in the future.

The model presented in this Example achieved an auROC of 0.803 and auPR of 0.304. Further Analysis of prediction performance on subpopulations of the cohort demonstrated robustness in discrimination performance across the entire pediatric population, including children with complex chronic diseases. Unlike previous studies (Hammond et al. 2019), the results presented in this Example were similar for boys and girls. Additional models were further devised for predicting obesity prior to two years of age. High impact of family anthropometric measurements in determining future obesity risk of the child was demonstrated. This Example showed that a prediction model constructed pre-birth, which is mainly based on family anthropometric measurements has very similar performance of predicting at 1 years of age based on the child's last available weight and length measurements. A simple self-assessed questionnaire for childhood obesity prediction pre-birth achieved an auROC of 0.798 and auPR of 0.296.

The technique presented in this Example has several advantages over previous studies. The technique presented in this Example include full data on both the child, from pregnancy to 5-6 years of age, and his family, and is the first to be validated both temporally and geographically at different clinics on a national level, thus representing a wide target population. The technique presented in this Example is the first to assess clinical utility by constructing decision curves. To date, there are no clinical guidelines defining the risk threshold for obesity prediction. The definition of this threshold may be influenced by many factors, including the characteristics of the proposed intervention, the availability of resources for intervention and the prevalence of obesity in the target population, and will impact the sensitivity and specificity of the prediction model. The decision curve analysis presented in this Example may thus help in determining risk thresholds and the clinical usefulness of the model for different interventions.

The mechanisms involved in the development of obesity in children are complex and include genetic, environmental, and developmental factors. The large cohort of Israeli children represents a diverse and multi-ethnic population with genetic heterogeneity. Not surprisingly, many of the variables found to be important in the model were directly related to the child's previous anthropometric measurements. Familial anthropometric measurements, including paternal, maternal and sibling's BMI were also important, in line with previous studies showing associations between these variables and childhood obesity. Among familial data, sibling's BMI had the highest impact on the prediction model, most likely due to both genetic and environmental influences.

There is evidence that uterine environment may cause a permanent influence on fetus future health, and may lead to enhanced susceptibility to diseases later in life. This concept is defined as ‘gestational programming’ of the fetus, and is thought to be mediated by Epigenetic mechanisms (Desai et al. 2015; Desai and Hales 1997). The data on maternal pregnancy, including lab tests, diagnoses and medications was used to analyze associations of these features to obesity status of the offspring at 5-6 years of age. One of the most prominent features in pregnancy was maternal blood glucose values (FIG. 7F). An increase in maternal blood glucose levels during pregnancy, adjusted for other features incorporated in the model (such as maternal BMI), was associated with a higher risk for childhood obesity. This association, which was apparent even in glucose values which are considered in the normal range, demonstrates that exposure to higher glucose levels in utero throughout the entire maternal glucose spectrum is significantly associated with childhood glucose and insulin resistance of the offspring and is independently associated with childhood adiposity. Ethnicity as a risk factor has previously been studied in the UK and USA populations, in which a higher prevalence of obesity was found among children of African descent (Brophy et al. 2009). The analysis presented in This Example concentrated on the Israeli population, and revealed North African Jewish descendancy as a strong contributor for predicting obesity.

The role of the gut microbiota in obesity has been vastly studied in recent years (Castaner et al. 2018). Microbiome composition undergoes many changes during the first years of life (Stewart et al. 2018). Antibiotics, which are frequently prescribed in the pediatric population (Chai et al. 2012), can significantly alter the microbiome composition (Robinson and Young 2010). Therefore, several recent studies assessed the relationship between antibiotic usage in early life and childhood obesity. These resulted in conflicting findings (Shao et al. 2017). The large sample size and the data on antibiotic prescriptions in pregnancy and infancy used in this Example allowed to explore this association. The analysis presented in this Example revealed that while the vast majority (80%) of the cohort received antibiotics at least once by the age of 2 years of age, antibiotic exposure in utero and in the first two years of life, and age of first exposure to antibiotic, had no observed impact on the obesity risk at 5-6 years of age.

The data used in This Example is from a retrospective observational EHR. These may suffer from potential biases and are affected by a variety of healthcare processes. Sampling bias was minimized by choosing children based on the schedule of routine measurements of weight and height, which includes both measurements at 0-2 years of age and a measurement at 5-6 years of age.

It is noted that while the prediction model presented in this Example is based on data of Israeli children, the validation process, which included both a temporal and a geographical validation, the well-known universal risk factors for childhood obesity that were found in the analysis of the model, and the striking similarity of the analysis on BMI trajectories to an independent, recently published German cohort (Geserick et al. 2018), indicates that the results may be generalized to other populations as well.

TABLE 2.2
Prediction Results
Temporal test set Geographical test set
Model auPR auROC auPR auROC
Baseline 0.223 0.749 0.177 0.736
(0.209-0.235) (0.739-0.758) (0.162-0.201) (0.712-0.755)
Full 0.304 0.803 0.251 0.789
Model (0.286-0.321) (0.796-0.812) (0.230-0.280) (0.771-0.805)
Abbreviations: auPR/auROC—Area under the PR/ROC curve, PR—Precision-Recall, ROC—Receiver-Operator-Characteristic

TABLE 2.3
Effects of varying decision threshold on model performance
Predicted probability threshold
2% 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% Baseline
Sensitivity 0.962 0.794 0.585 0.364 0.236 0.142 0.281
Specificity 0.257 0.651 0.840 0.946 0.977 0.991 0.949
PPV 0.089 0.146 0.215 0.334 0.435 0.533 0.291
NPV 0.989 0.977 0.964 0.952 0.945 0.939 0.946
Net Benefit 0.053 0.038 0.024 0.013 0.007 0.004
Abbreviations: NPV—Negative predictive value, PPV—positive predictive value

TABLE 2.4
Prediction of obesity at 5-6 years of age prior to 2 years of age
Age of applying Temporal test set Geographical test set
prediction auPR auROC auPR auROC
Pre-birth Full 0.176 0.708 0.134 0.680
Model (0.168-0.188) (0.689-0.723) (0.125-0.153) (0.660-0.704)
Birth Full 0.177 0.711 0.134 0.684
Model (0.169-0.189) (0.701-0.726) (0.124-0.153) (0.666-0.708)
 6 months Baseline 0.133 0.671 0.099 0.641
(0.126-0.144) (0.666-0.681) (0.085-0.117) (0.620-0.669)
Full 0.230 0.759 0.174 0.728
Model (0.216-0.249) (0.751-0.769) (0.153-0.200) (0.713-0.747)
12 months Baseline 0.166 0.709 0.130 0.684
(0.159-0.178) (0.700-0.716) (0.117-0.147) (0.667-0.703)
Full 0.249 0.777 0.204 0.755
Model (0.233-0.267) (0.769-0.787) (0.187-0.229) (0.739-0.775)
18 months Baseline 0.190 0.732 0.162 0.716
(0.179-0.201) (0.726-0.742) (0.147-0.184) (0.693-0.740)
Full 0.278 0.791 0.230 0.775
Model (0.262-0.297) (0.783-0.800) (0.215-0.255) (0.759-0.792)
 2 years Baseline 0.223 0.749 0.177 0.736
(0.209-0.235) (0.739-0.758) (0.162-0.201) (0.712-0.755)
Full 0.304 0.803 0.251 0.789
Model (0.286-0.321) (0.796-0.812) (0.230-0.280) (0.771-0.805)
Abbreviations: auPR/auROC—Area under the PR/ROC curve, PR—Precision-Recall, ROC—Receiver-Operator-Characteristic

Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.

All publications, patents and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference into the specification, to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated herein by reference. In addition, citation or identification of any reference in this application shall not be construed as an admission that such reference is available as prior art to the present invention. To the extent that section headings are used, they should not be construed as necessarily limiting. In addition, any priority document(s) of this application is/are hereby incorporated herein by reference in its/their entirety.

REFERENCES

  • [1] NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) (2017). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 390, 2627-2642.
  • [2] Ebbeling, C. B., Pawlak, D. B., and Ludwig, D. S. (2002). Childhood obesity: public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet 360, 473-482.
  • [3] Karnik, S., and Kanekar, A. (2012). Childhood obesity: a global public health crisis. Int. J. Prev. Med. 3, 1-7.
  • [4] Young-Hyman, D., Schlundt, D. G., Herman, L., De Luca, F., and Counts, D. (2001). Evaluation of the insulin resistance syndrome in 5- to 10-year-old overweight/obese African-American children. Diabetes Care 24, 1359-1364.
  • [5] Molnár, D. (2004). The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 28 Suppl 3, S70-4.
  • [6] Sawyer, M. G., Harchak, T., Wake, M., and Lynch, J. (2011). Four-year prospective study of BMI and mental health problems in young children. Pediatrics 128, 677-684.
  • [7] Jeffery, R. W., Drewnowski, A., Epstein, L. H., Stunkard, A. J., Wilson, G. T., Wing, R. R., and Hill, D. R. (2000). Long-term maintenance of weight loss: current status. Health Psychol. 19, 5-16.
  • [8] Reinehr, T., Kleber, M., Lass, N., and Toschke, A. M. (2010). Body mass index patterns over 5 y in obese children motivated to participate in a 1-y lifestyle intervention: age as a predictor of long-term success. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 91, 1165-1171.
  • [9] He, M., and Evans, A. (2007). Are parents aware that their children are overweight or obese? Do they care? Can. Fam. Physician 53, 1493-1499.
  • [10] Patel, A. I., Madsen, K. A., Maselli, J. H., Cabana, M. D., Stafford, R. S., and Hersh, A. L. (2010). Underdiagnosis of pediatric obesity during outpatient preventive care visits. Acad. Pediatr. 10, 405-409.
  • [11] Riley, M. R., Bass, N. M., Rosenthal, P., and Merriman, R. B. (2005). Underdiagnosis of pediatric obesity and underscreening for fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome by pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists. J. Pediatr. 147, 839-842.
  • [12] Redsell, S. A., Atkinson, P. J., Nathan, D., Siriwardena, A. N., Swift, J. A., and Glazebrook, C. (2011). Preventing childhood obesity during infancy in UK primary care: a mixed-methods study of HCPs' knowledge, beliefs and practice. BMC Fam. Pract. 12, 54.
  • [13] Barlow, S. E., and Expert Committee (2007). Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics 120 Suppl 4, S164-92.
  • [14] Cunningham, S. A., Kramer, M. R., and Narayan, K. M. V. (2014). Incidence of childhood obesity in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 403-411.
  • [15] Gardner, D. S. L., Hosking, J., Metcalf, B. S., Jeffery, A. N., Voss, L. D., and Wilkin, T. J. (2009). Contribution of early weight gain to childhood overweight and metabolic health: a longitudinal study (EarlyBird 36). Pediatrics 123, e67-73.
  • [16] Geserick, M., Vogel, M., Gausche, R., Lipek, T., Spielau, U., Keller, E., Pfäffle, R., Kiess, W., and Körner, A. (2018). Acceleration of BMI in early childhood and risk of sustained obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 1303-1312.
  • [17] Data—Clalit Research Institute Available at: http://clalitresearch(dot)org/about-us/our-data/ [Accessed Oct. 7, 2018].
  • [18] Daniels, S. R., Hassink, S. G., and COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION (2015). The role of the pediatrician in primary prevention of obesity. Pediatrics 136, e275-92.
  • [19] WHOCC—Structure and principles Available at: https://www(dot)whocc(dot)no/atc/structure_and_principles/ [Accessed Oct. 12, 2018].
  • [20] Fedorov, V., Mannino, F., and Zhang, R. (2009). Consequences of dichotomization. Pharm. Stat. 8, 50-61.
  • [21] Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. undefined.
  • [22] Saito, T., and Rehmsmeier, M. (2015). The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets. PLoS ONE 10, e0118432.
  • [23] Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., Gerds, T., Gonen, M., Obuchowski, N., Pencina, M. J., and Kattan, M. W. (2010). Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 21, 128-138.
  • [24] Gerds, T. A., Cai, T., and Schumacher, M. (2008). The performance of risk prediction models. Biom. J. 50, 457-479.
  • [25] Niculescu-Mizil, A., and Caruana, R. (2005). Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning—ICML '05 (New York, N.Y., USA: ACM Press), pp. 625-632.
  • [26] Aggarwal, C. C. ed. (2015). Data Classification: Algorithms and Applications illustrated. (CRC Press).
  • [27] Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., and Collins, G. S. (2015). Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 162, W1-73.
  • [28] Vickers, A. J., and Elkin, E. B. (2006). Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med. Decis. Making 26, 565-574.
  • [29] Vickers, A. J., Van Calster, B., and Steyerberg, E. W. (2016). Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests. BMJ 352, i6.
  • [30] Lundberg, S. M., and Lee, S.-I. (2017). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions.
  • [31] Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G. G., and Lee, S.-I. (2018). Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles. arXiv.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A method of predicting likelihood for childhood obesity, comprising:

obtaining a plurality of parameters, wherein at least a few of said parameters characterize an infant or toddler subject;

accessing a computer readable medium storing a machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity;

feeding said procedure with said plurality of parameters; and

receiving from said procedure an output indicative of a likelihood that said infant or toddler subject is expected to develop childhood obesity, wherein said output is related non-linearly to said parameters.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from an electronic health record associated with said infant or toddler subject.

3. The method according to claim 1, comprising presenting to a user, by a user interface, a questionnaire and a set of questionnaire controls, receiving a set of response parameters entered by said user using said questionnaire controls, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises said response parameters.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from a body liquid test applied to said infant or toddler subject.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter characterizing a parent or a sibling of said infant or toddler subject.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein said at least one parameter characterizing said parent comprise a parameter extracted from a body liquid test applied to said parent or sibling.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from a diagnosis previously recorded for said subject.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter indicative of a pharmaceutical prescribed for said infant or toddler subject.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein said infant or toddler subject is less than two years of age.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein said infant or toddler subject is not obese.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein said infant or toddler subject has a normal weight.

12. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises a weight-for-length score of said infant or toddler subject.

13. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprise a weight of said infant or toddler subject at age of from about 4 to about 6 months, a weight of said infant or toddler subject at age of from about 12 to about 16 months, and a weight of said infant or toddler subject at age of from about 18 to about 22 months.

14. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises a parameter pertaining to a body-mass-index of a sibling of said infant or toddler subject.

15. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises a parameter pertaining to a body-mass-index of a father of said infant or toddler subject.

16. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises a result of a hemoglobin concentration test applied to said infant or toddler subject.

17. The method according to claim 1, wherein said wherein said plurality of parameters comprises a result of a mean platelet volume test applied to said infant or toddler subject.

18. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least 10 of the parameters listed in Table 1.1.

19. A method of predicting likelihood for childhood obesity, comprising:

obtaining a plurality of parameters characterizing at least one of a parent and a sibling of an unborn subject;

accessing a computer readable medium storing a machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity;

feeding said procedure with said plurality of parameters; and

receiving from said procedure an output indicative of a likelihood that said unborn subject is expected to develop childhood obesity after birth, wherein said output is related non-linearly to said parameters.

20. The method according to claim 19, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from an electronic health record associated with said at least one of said parent and said sibling.

21. The method according to claim 19, comprising presenting to a user, by a user interface, a questionnaire and a set of questionnaire controls, receiving a set of response parameters entered by said user using said questionnaire controls, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises said response parameters.

22. The method according to claim 19, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least one parameter extracted from a body liquid test applied to said at least one of said parent and said sibling.

23. The method according to claim 19, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises a parameter pertaining to a body-mass-index of said sibling.

24. The method according to claim 19, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises a parameter pertaining to a body-mass-index of a father of said unborn subject.

25. The method according to claim 19, wherein said plurality of parameters comprises at least 10 of the parameters listed in Table 1.2.

26. A method of predicting likelihood for childhood obesity, comprising:

presenting on a user interface a questionnaire and a set of questionnaire controls, and receiving from said user interface a set of response parameters entered using said questionnaire controls, wherein said set of response parameters characterizes an infant or toddler subject;

accessing a computer readable medium storing a machine learning procedure trained for predicting likelihoods for childhood obesity;

feeding said procedure with said set of parameters; and

receiving from said procedure an output indicative of a likelihood that said infant or toddler subject is expected to develop childhood obesity, wherein said output is related non-linearly to said parameters.

Resources

Images & Drawings included:

Sources:

Recent applications in this class:

Recent applications for this Assignee: