US20250389083A1
2025-12-25
18/879,456
2023-06-16
Smart Summary: A digestion accelerator helps break down materials like wood more quickly. It contains a special type of quaternary ammonium compound and one or more types of amine compounds. The ratio of these compounds is carefully controlled, ranging from 5:1 to 10,000:1. To make pulp, this accelerator is added during a digestion process that also includes an alkaline or sulfite-based agent. This method improves the efficiency of turning lignocellulose materials into pulp. 🚀 TL;DR
A digestion accelerator includes a specified quaternary ammonium compound, and at least one amine compound selected from the group consisting of a specified primary monoamine, a specified secondary monoamine, and a specified tertiary monoamine. A mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound is 5:1 to 10000:1. A method for producing pulp includes a digestion step of adding at least one main agent selected from the group consisting of an alkaline main agent and a sulfite-based main agent, and a digestion accelerator, to digest a material including lignocellulose, in which the digestion accelerator is the above digestion accelerator.
Get notified when new applications in this technology area are published.
D21C3/222 » CPC main
Pulping cellulose-containing materials; Other features of pulping processes Use of compounds accelerating the pulping processes
D21C3/022 » CPC further
Pulping cellulose-containing materials with inorganic bases or alkaline reacting compounds, e.g. sulfate processes in presence of S-containing compounds
D21C3/22 IPC
Pulping cellulose-containing materials Other features of pulping processes
D21C3/02 IPC
Pulping cellulose-containing materials with inorganic bases or alkaline reacting compounds, e.g. sulfate processes
The present disclosure relates to a digestion accelerator, and a method for producing pulp with the digestion accelerator.
Alkaline main agents are used for pulping materials including lignocellulose in digestion steps of methods for producing pulp. Digestion accelerators are used for efficiently performing digestion. As such a digestion accelerator, Patent Literature 1 discloses a digestion accelerator containing a quaternary ammonium compound. Patent Literature 2 discloses a digestion accelerator containing at least one of glucose and fructose.
In a case where an alkaline main agent and the digestion accelerator disclosed in Patent Literature 1 and Patent Literature 2 are used in a digestion step of a method for producing pulp, a material including lignocellulose can be efficiently digested as compared with digestion where only an alkaline main agent is used. However, there is a demand for a further increase in efficiency of digestion in order to efficiently produce pulp, from the viewpoint of price increase of wood according to the expansion of a demand for wood in recent years, suppression of deforestation according to global warming, and the like.
In view of the above circumstances, an objective of the present disclosure is to provide a digestion accelerator capable of efficiently digesting a material including lignocellulose in a digestion step of pulping a material including lignocellulose, and a method for producing pulp with the digestion accelerator.
The inventors of the present disclosure have made intensive studies for achieving the above objective, and as a result, have found that the above objective can be achieved by a digestion accelerator including a specified quaternary ammonium compound, and at least one amine compound selected from the group consisting of a specified primary monoamine, a specified secondary monoamine, and a specified tertiary monoamine, and a digestion accelerator including a specified quaternary ammonium compound, and a sulfur-containing compound that generates a sulfide ion, a polysulfide ion, or a hydrogen sulfide ion in the presence of the quaternary ammonium compound, thereby leading to completion of the present disclosure.
In order to achieve the above objective, [1] the digestion accelerator according to the present disclosure includes a quaternary ammonium compound represented by formula (1), and at least one amine compound selected from the group consisting of a primary monoamine represented by formula (2), a secondary monoamine represented by formula (3), and a tertiary monoamine represented by formula (4).
In formula (1), R1 is an alkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, or a hydroxyalkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms,
In formula (2), R5 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A2O)kZ group, A2O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and k is an integer of 1 to 6.
In formula (3), R6 and R7 are each independently an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)rZ group, A3O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and r is an integer of 1 to 12.
In formula (4), R8 and R9 are each independently an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)tZ group, A4O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and t is an integer of 1 to 12, and
In addition, [2] a mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound may be 5:1 to 10000:1.
In addition, [3] the digestion accelerator according to the present disclosure includes a quaternary ammonium compound represented by formula (1), and a sulfur-containing compound that generates a sulfide ion, a polysulfide ion, or a hydrogen sulfide ion in the presence of the quaternary ammonium compound.
In formula (1), R1 is an alkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, or a hydroxyalkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms,
In addition, [4] the sulfur-containing compound may include at least one compound selected from the group consisting of thiosulfate, hydrogen thiosulfate, sulfite, hydrogen sulfite, disulfite, dithionite, dithionate, disulfate, peroxosulfate, peroxodisulfate, and polythionate.
In addition, [5] a mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound may be 1:2 to 100:1.
In addition, in order to achieve the above objective, [6] the method for producing pulp according to the present disclosure includes a digestion step of adding at least one main agent selected from the group consisting of an alkaline main agent and a sulfite-based main agent, and a digestion accelerator, to digest a material including lignocellulose, wherein the digestion accelerator is the digestion accelerator according to [1] or [3].
In addition, [7] a content of the digestion accelerator may be 0.001% by mass to 1.0% by mass relative to the material including the lignocellulose.
According to the digestion accelerator and the method for producing pulp with the digestion accelerator of the present disclosure, a material including lignocellulose can be efficiently digested.
Hereinafter, each mode for carrying out the present disclosure (hereinafter, simply referred to as “Embodiment”.) is described in detail. The following Embodiments are illustrative for describing the present disclosure, and are not intended to limit the present disclosure to the following content. The present disclosure can be appropriately modified and carried out within the gist thereof.
A digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 includes a quaternary ammonium compound, and at least one amine compound selected from the group consisting of a primary monoamine, a secondary monoamine, and a tertiary monoamine. First, the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound are described. Next, the digestion accelerator including them is described.
The quaternary ammonium compound included in the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 is a compound represented by the following formula (1).
Furthermore, in a case where R2, R3, and R4 in formula (1) are each a hydroxyalkyl group, a hydroxyalkenyl group, or an alkyleneoxy group, these each preferably have the following structure from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
In a case where R2 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)nY group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, and n is preferably an integer of 1 to 15. The sum is more preferably 1 to 9, still more preferably 1 to 6.
In a case where R3 or R4 are each independently a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)mY group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, and m is preferably an integer of 1 to 15. The sum is more preferably 1 to 9, still more preferably 1 to 6.
In a case where, in R2 and R3 or R4, R2 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)nY group and R3 or R4 is each independently a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)mY group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, n, and m is preferably an integer of 2 to 15. The sum is more preferably 2 to 9, still more preferably 2 to 6.
In a case where, in R3 and R4, R3 and R4 are each independently a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)mY group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, and m is preferably an integer of 2 to 15. The sum is more preferably 2 to 9, still more preferably 2 to 6.
In a case where, in R2, R3, and R4, R2 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)nY group and R3 and R4 are each independently a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)mY group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, n, and m is preferably an integer of 3 to 15. The sum is more preferably 3 to 9, still more preferably 3 to 6.
Xp− in formula (1) represents a counterion. p represents the valence of an ion. p is 1 to 40, and is preferably 1 to 20, more preferably 1 to 3 from the viewpoint of productization, industrialization, and cost. The counterion is not limited as long as it is an anion capable of being taken with the quaternary ammonium compound to constitute a salt. Examples of the counterion include (i) an inorganic anion and (ii) an organic anion.
Examples of the inorganic anion (i) include halogen ions such as chloride ions and bromide ions, hydroxy ions, sulfate ions, nitrate ions, phosphate ions, borate ions, sulfonate ions, hypochlorite ions, nitrite ions, phosphite ions, diphosphite ions, sulfite ions, hydrogen sulfite ions, sulfide ions, hydrogen sulfide ions, polysulfide ions, thiol ions, thiosulfate ions, and thioglycollate.
Examples of the organic anion (ii) include i) an organic carboxylate ion, ii) phosphate ester ion, iii) a sulfonate ion, iv) an alkyl carbonate ion, v) a sulfate ester ion, and vi) an anionic polymer. Examples of the organic carboxylate ion i) include formate ions, acetate ions, propionate ions, gluconate ions, lactate ions, fumarate ions, maleate ions, and adipate ions. Examples of the phosphate ester ion ii) include polyoxyalkylene alkyl ether phosphate ester ions, alkyl phosphate monoester ions, alkyl phosphate diester ions, alkenyl phosphate ester ions, and aryl phosphate ester ions. Examples of the sulfonate ion iii) include alkylbenzenesulfonate ions and alkylsulfonate ions. Examples of the alkyl carbonate ion iv) include methyl carbonate ions and ethyl carbonate ions. Examples of the sulfate ester ion v) include alkyl sulfate ester ions and polyoxyalkylene alkyl ether sulfate ester ions. Examples of the anionic polymer vi) include polyacrylic acid, polymaleic acid, polyphosphoric acid, and polysulfuric acid compounds.
Among these counterions, the inorganic anion (i) is preferably a halogen ion such as a chloride ion or a bromide ion, a sulfate ion, a nitrate ion, a borate ion, or a phosphate ion from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion. The organic anion (ii) is preferably an alkyl phosphate monoester ion in which the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl group is 1 to 4, such as a butyl phosphate ester ion; an alkyl phosphate diester ion in which the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl group is 1 to 4, such as a dibutyl phosphate ester ion; an alkylbenzenesulfonate ion in which the number of carbon atoms in p-toluenesulfonate or the like is 1 to 4; or an alkyl sulfate ester ion in which the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl group is 1 to 4, such as a methyl sulfate ion (CH3SO4−) or an ethyl sulfate ion (C2H5SO4−).
The amine compound included in the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 includes at least one amine compound selected from the group consisting of a primary monoamine, a secondary monoamine, and a tertiary monoamine.
The primary monoamine is a compound represented by the following formula (2).
In formula (2), R5 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A2O)kZ group. Here, A2O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. k is an integer of 1 to 6.
R5 is preferably an alkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, or an (A2O)kZ group from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion. Here, A2O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. k is an integer of 1 to 2. R5 is more preferably an alkyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, or an (A2O)kZ group. Here, A2O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. k is 1.
The secondary monoamine is a compound represented by the following formula (3).
In formula (3), R6 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r1Z group. Here, A3O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. r1 is an integer of 1 to 12. In formula (3), R7 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r2Z group. Here, A3O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. r2 is an integer of 1 to 12. In addition, R6 and R7 may be the same as or different from each other.
Here, the (A3O)r1Z group of R6 and the (A3O)r2Z group of R7 may also be collectively designated as “(A3O)rZ group”.
R6 and R7 in formula (3) each preferably have the following structure from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
R6 is preferably an alkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r1Z group. Here, A3O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. r1 is an integer of 1 to 6. R6 is more preferably an alkyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r1Z group. Here, A3O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. r1 is an integer of 2 to 4.
R7 is preferably an alkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r2Z group. Here, A3O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. r2 is an integer of 1 to 6. R7 is more preferably an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 carbon atom, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r2Z group. Here, A3O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. r2 is an integer of 2 to 4.
Furthermore, in a case where R6 and R7 in formula (3) are each a hydroxyalkyl group, a hydroxyalkenyl group, or an alkyleneoxy group, R6 and R7 each preferably have the following structure from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
In a case where R6 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r1Y group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, and r1 is an integer of 1 to 12. The sum is preferably 1 to 6, more preferably 1 to 4.
In a case where R7 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r2Y group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, and r2 is an integer of 1 to 12. The sum is preferably 1 to 6, more preferably 1 to 4.
In a case where, in R6 and R7, R6 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r1Y group and R7 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)r2Y group, preferably the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, r1, and r2 is an integer of 2 to 12. The sum is preferably 2 to 6, more preferably 2 to 4. In addition, R6 and R7 may be mutually the same in structure or may be mutually different in structure.
The tertiary monoamine is a compound represented by the following formula (4).
In formula (4), R8 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t1Z group. A4O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. t1 is an integer of 1 to 12.
In formula (4), R9 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t2Z group. A4O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. t2 is an integer of 1 to 12. In addition, R8 and R9 may be mutually the same in structure or may be mutually different in structure.
Here, the (A4O)tZ group of R8 and the (A4O)t2Z group of R9 may also be collectively designated as “(A4O)tZ group”.
In formula (4), R10 is an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A5O)uZ group. A5O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. u is an integer of 1 to 12.
R8, R9 and R10 in formula (4) each preferably have the following structure from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
R8 is preferably an alkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t1Z group. A4O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. t1 is an integer of 1 to 6. R8 is more preferably an alkyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t1Z group. A4O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. t1 is an integer of 1 to 4.
R9 is preferably an alkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 18 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t2Z group. A4O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. t2 is an integer of 1 to 6. R9 is more preferably an alkyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 10 to 14 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t2Z group. A4O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. t2 is an integer of 1 to 4.
R10 is preferably an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A5O)uZ group. A5O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. u is an integer of 1 to 6. R10 is more preferably an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A5O)uZ group. A5O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group. u is an integer of 1 to 4.
Furthermore, in a case where R8, R9, and R10 in formula (4) are each a hydroxyalkyl group, a hydroxyalkenyl group, or an alkyleneoxy group, these each preferably have the following structure from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
In a case where R8 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)tZ group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, and t1 is an integer of 1 to 12. The sum is preferably 1 to 6, more preferably 1 to 4.
In a case where R9 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t2Z group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, and t2 is an integer of 1 to 12. The sum is preferably 1 to 6, more preferably 1 to 4.
In a case where R10 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A5O)uZ group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, and u is an integer of 1 to 12. The sum is preferably 1 to 6, more preferably 1 to 4.
In a case where, in R8 and R9, R8 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t1Z group and R9 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t2Z group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, t1, and t2 is an integer of 2 to 12. The sum is preferably 2 to 6, more preferably 2 to 4. In addition, R8, and R9 may be mutually the same in structure or may be mutually different in structure.
In a case where, in R8 and R10, R8 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t1Z group and R10 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A5O)uZ group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, t1, and u is an integer of 2 to 12. The sum is preferably 2 to 6, more preferably 2 to 4. In addition, R8 and R10 may be mutually the same in structure or may be mutually different in structure.
In a case where, in R9 and R10, R9 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t2Z group and R10 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A5O)uZ group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, t2, and u is an integer of 2 to 12. The sum is preferably 2 to 6, more preferably 2 to 4. In addition, R9 and R10 may be mutually the same in structure or may be mutually different in structure.
In a case where, in R8, R9, and R10, R8 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t1Z group, R9 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)t2Z group, and R10 is a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A5O)uZ group, the sum of the number of such hydroxyalkyl groups, the number of such hydroxyalkenyl groups, t1, t2, and u is an integer of 3 to 12. The sum is preferably 3 to 6, more preferably 3 to 4. In addition, R8, R9, and R10 may be the same as or different from each other.
The above amine compound is preferably the secondary monoamine, more preferably the primary monoamine, further preferably the tertiary monoamine from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 includes the above quaternary ammonium compound and amine compound. The mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound is 5:1 to 10000:1. The mass ratio is preferably 10:1 to 10000:1, more preferably 10:1 to 1000:1 from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
The content of the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 is 0.001% by mass to 1.0% by mass relative to a material including lignocellulose. For example, the content of the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 is 1.0 to 1000 mg based on 100 g of a material including lignocellulose, and is preferably 2 to 500 mg, more preferably 5 to 200 mg from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 may include two or more of such quaternary ammonium compounds different in structure. The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 may include two or more of such amine compounds.
The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 in which the specified quaternary ammonium compound and the specified amine compound are included, as described above, can be used in a digestion step, to efficiently digest a material including lignocellulose without any loss in activity of the quaternary ammonium compound.
Next, a digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 is described.
The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 includes a quaternary ammonium compound, and a sulfur-containing compound that generates a sulfide ion, a polysulfide ion, or a hydrogen sulfide ion in the presence of the quaternary ammonium compound. First, the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound are described. Next, the digestion accelerator including them is described.
The quaternary ammonium compound included in the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 is substantially the same as the quaternary ammonium compound described in Embodiment 1.
The sulfur-containing compound included in the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 is a compound that generates a sulfide ion, a polysulfide ion, or a hydrogen sulfide ion in the presence of the quaternary ammonium compound. The sulfur-containing compound include, for example, at least one compound selected from the group consisting of thiosulfate, hydrogen thiosulfate, sulfite, hydrogen sulfite, disulfite, dithionite, dithionate, disulfate, peroxosulfate, peroxodisulfate, and polythionate. The sulfur-containing compound preferably includes at least one compound selected from the group consisting of sodium thiosulfate, ammonium thiosulfate, sodium hydrogen sulfide, and sodium sulfide from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 includes the above quaternary ammonium compound and sulfur-containing compound. The mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound is 1:1 to 100:1. The mass ratio is preferably 1:1 to 50:1, more preferably 1:1 to 20:1 from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
The content of the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 is 0.001% by mass to 1.0% by mass relative to a material including lignocellulose. For example, the content of the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 is 1.0 to 1000 mg based on 100 g of a material including lignocellulose, and is preferably 2 to 500 mg, more preferably 5 to 200 mg from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 may include two or more of such quaternary ammonium compounds different in structure. The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1 may include two or more of such sulfur-containing compounds.
The digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 including the specified quaternary ammonium compound and the specified sulfur-containing compound as described above can be used in a digestion step, to efficiently digest a material including lignocellulose. In other words, the sulfur-containing compound is included in the digestion accelerator and thus a state is made in which a sulfide ion, a polysulfide ion, a hydrogen sulfide ion, or the like is much present around the quaternary ammonium compound. The digestion accelerator, when used in a digestion step, can digest lignocellulose by an irreversible reaction. For example, in the case of a digestion step in an alkaline digestion method, sodium sulfide or the like is separately used from such a digestion accelerator. A sulfide ion, a polysulfide ion, a hydrogen sulfide ion, or the like generated here is not much present around the quaternary ammonium compound, and it is thus difficult to generate an irreversible reaction. Therefore, it is difficult to efficiently digest lignocellulose.
[Solvent and Additive Capable of being Added in Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2]
The above digestion accelerator of each of Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2 may include water or an organic solvent. The digestion accelerator can be, for example, dissolved or emulsified in water or an organic solvent and then used. Examples of the organic solvent include lower alcohols in which the number of carbon chains is 1 to 6, such as methanol, ethanol, and propanol; alkylene glycols in which the number of carbon chains is 1 to 6, such as ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and propylene glycol; and 3-methyl-3-methoxybutanol.
The above digestion accelerator of each of Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2 may further include an additive from the viewpoint of allowing the digestion accelerator to efficiently penetrate into a material including lignocellulose.
Examples of the additive include a non-ionic surfactant, an anionic surfactant, a cationic surfactant, an amphoteric surfactant, mineral oil, natural oil such as orange oil, an alkaline agent, and acid. The digestion accelerator may further include, for example, a defoamer and/or a washing agent from the viewpoint of enhancing washing properties of pulp. Such an additive can be added to the digestion accelerator as long as the effects of the digestion accelerator are not impaired.
Examples of the above alkaline agent include inorganic alkali. Examples of the inorganic alkali include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, and ammonia.
Examples of the above acid include inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, and phosphoric acid, and organic acids such as acetic acid, formic acid, lactic acid, and oxalic acid.
The foregoing is the description of the compounds and the like included in the digestion accelerator of each of Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2. Next, a production method of the quaternary ammonium compound included in the digestion accelerator of each of Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2, and a production method of the amine compound in Embodiment 1 are described.
The quaternary ammonium compound can be synthesized by various methods. In such a synthesis method, for example, the quaternary ammonium compound is obtained by adding a quaternizing agent having R4 to a tertiary amine having R1, R2, and R3 to allow these to react at a temperature of 70 to 150° C.
In another synthesis method, in the case of a quaternary ammonium compound in which R4 is an (AO)H group, the quaternary ammonium compound is obtained by neutralizing a tertiary amine having R1, R2, and R3 with any acid and then adding an alkylene oxide in an equivalent amount to the amount of the tertiary amine, into the mixture after neutralization, to perform a quaternization reaction at a temperature of 70 to 120° C. Here, AO is an alkyleneoxy group.
In an example of still another synthesis method, in the case of a quaternary ammonium compound in which R2, R3, and R4 are substituents respectively represented by an (AO)nH group, an (AO)m1H group, and an (AO)m2H group, the quaternary ammonium compound is obtained by adding a predetermined amount of an alkylene oxide to trialkanolamine to add the above substituents at a temperature of 100 to 150° C., and then adding a quaternizing agent having R1, to the resulting mixture, to allow these to react at a temperature of 60 to 130° C. n, m1 and m2 are each, for example, an integer of 1 to 9.
The amine compound included in the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 1, and the sulfur-containing compound included in the digestion accelerator of Embodiment 2 can be each synthesized by a known method. For example, the tertiary monoamine is obtained by a polymerization reaction of an alkylene oxide with an alkylamine having 1 to 22 carbon atoms at a temperature of 70 to 150° C.
The digestion accelerator of each of Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2, described above, is used in a digestion step of a method for producing pulp. Next, a method for producing pulp, with such a digestion accelerator, is described.
The method for producing pulp includes a digestion step of digesting a material including lignocellulose, with at least one main agent selected from the group consisting of an alkaline main agent and a sulfite-based main agent, and the digestion accelerator, a washing step of washing pulp obtained by digestion, a screening step of removing dust from the pulp, and a bleaching step of bleaching the pulp.
In the digestion step, for example, the digestion accelerator of any Embodiment, a material including lignocellulose, and an alkaline main agent are added to a digestion oven, and digested under conditions of high temperature and high pressure. Such digestion is made to take out a fibrous content (pulp) from lignocellulose.
The temperature, pressure and time in the digestion step are appropriately set depending on the type, shape, and size of the material including lignocellulose. For example, in a case where the material including lignocellulose is a wood chip, the temperature is, for example, 50 to 300° C., and is preferably 80 to 250° C. from the viewpoint of a reduction in load on facilities such as a digestion oven. The pressure is, for example, ordinary pressure to 10 MPa, and is preferably ordinary pressure to 5 MPa from the viewpoint of a reduction in load on facilities such as a digestion oven. The time is, for example, 1 to 5 hours from the viewpoint of a reduction in load on facilities such as a digestion oven.
Examples of the digestion method adopted in this digestion step include an alkaline digestion method and a sulfite digestion method. Such an alkaline digestion method can be further classified into a kraft method, a soda method, a soda method, a polysulfide method, and the like. Such a sulfite digestion method can be further classified into an alkaline sulfite method, a neutral sulfite method, a bisulfite method, and the like. The digestion method is preferably an alkaline digestion method from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion. Among these alkaline digestion methods, a kraft method and a polysulfide method are preferred from the viewpoint of promotion of digestion.
Examples of the alkaline main agent used in the alkaline digestion method include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, and potassium carbonate. The amount of the alkaline main agent used in the digestion step differs depending on the type of the material including lignocellulose, and is 1 to 120 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the material including lignocellulose. The amount is preferably 3 to 60 parts by mass, more preferably 5 to 60 parts by mass from the viewpoint that the digestion is efficiently performed to allow the effects of the digestion accelerator to be exerted.
A kraft method as one alkaline digestion method is a method of digestion with an alkaline main agent and sodium sulfide. For example, in a case where the alkaline main agent is sodium hydroxide, the amount of sodium sulfide used is 1 to 200 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of sodium hydroxide, and is preferably 10 to 100 parts by mass from the viewpoint that the digestion is efficiently performed.
A polysulfide method as one alkaline digestion method is a method of digestion with an alkaline main agent, sodium sulfide, and sodium polysulfide (Na2Sx, x=2 to 5). For example, in a case where the alkaline main agent is sodium hydroxide, the amount of sodium sulfide used is 1 to 200 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of sodium hydroxide, and is preferably 10 to 100 parts by mass from the viewpoint that the digestion is efficiently performed. The amount of the sodium polysulfide used is 1 to 200 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the sodium hydroxide, and is preferably 10 to 100 parts by mass from the viewpoint that the digestion is efficiently performed.
A soda method as one alkaline digestion method is a method of digestion with an alkaline main agent. For example, sodium hydroxide is used as the alkaline main agent.
Examples of the material including lignocellulose include wood and vegetation. Examples of the wood include wood of Laubholz with hardwood as a raw material and wood of Nadelholz with softwood as a raw material. Examples of the vegetation include bacchus, reed, kenaf, mulberry tree, and bamboo. Such wood and vegetation are, for example, shaped into chips and then used.
The present disclosure is described in further detail with reference to the following Examples and Comparative Examples, but the present disclosure is not limited to the following Examples at all. In Examples and Comparative Examples, the following quaternary ammonium compound, amine compound, sulfur-containing compound, and material including lignocellulose were used.
R1, R2, R3, R4, and the counterion of each quaternary ammonium compound (E1 to E8, e9 to e10) used in Example and Comparative Example have a structure shown in Table 1. These quaternary ammonium compounds (E1 to E8, e9 to e10) were each synthesized.
| Quaternary |
| ammonium | Functional group |
| compound | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | Counterion |
| E1 | C12H25 | CH3 | CH3 | C2H5 | C2H5SO4− |
| (Lauryl) | |||||
| E2 | C12H25 | CH3 | CH3 | Benzyl | Cl− |
| (Stearyl) | |||||
| E3 | C12H25 | C2H4OH | C2H4OH | C2H5 | C2H5SO4− |
| (Lauryl) | |||||
| E4 | C12H25 | C2H4OH | C2H4OH | C2H4OH | NO3− |
| (Lauryl) | |||||
| E5 | C18H37 | CH3 | CH3 | CH3 | CH3SO4− |
| (Stearyl) | |||||
| E6 | C8H17 | CH3 | CH3 | C2H4OH | Phosphate ion |
| (Octyl) | (PO33−) |
| E7 | C12H25 | (EO)8H | C2H4OH | p-Toluene- |
| (Lauryl) | sulfonate ion | ||||
| (C6H4(CH3)SO3−) | |||||
| E8 | C10H21 | C10H21 | CH3 | CH3 | Cl− |
| (Decyl) | (Decyl) |
| e9 | C12H25 | (EO)32H | CH3 | CH3SO4− |
| (Lauryl) | |||||
| e10 | C6H13 | C2H4OH | C2H4OH | C2H5 | C2H5SO4− |
| (Hexyl) | |||||
To a four-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, 1 molar equivalent of lauryldimethylamine was added, and the resultant was heated to 85 to 95° C. Thereto was dropped and simultaneously stirred 1.1 molar equivalents of diethyl sulfate, to perform a quaternization reaction, and thus a quaternary ammonium compound E1 was obtained.
To a four-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, 1 molar equivalent of lauryldimethylamine and distilled water in an amount of two times the mass of lauryldimethylamine were added, and the resultant was heated to 85 to 95° C. Thereto was dropped and simultaneously stirred 1.1 molar equivalents of benzyl chloride, to perform a quaternization reaction, and thus E2 was obtained.
To a pressure-resistant reaction vessel, 1 molar equivalent of laurylamine was added, purged with nitrogen, and then heated to 120 to 130° C. Thereinto was blown 2 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide, and thus an adduct in which 2 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was added to laurylamine was obtained. Next, 1 molar equivalent of the adduct obtained was added to a four-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, and heated to 85 to 95° C. Thereto was dropped and simultaneously stirred 1.1 molar equivalents of diethyl sulfate, to perform a quaternization reaction, and thus a quaternary ammonium compound E3 was obtained.
To a pressure-resistant reaction vessel, 1 molar equivalent of laurylamine was added, purged with nitrogen, and then heated to 120 to 130° C. Thereinto was blown 2 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide, and thus an adduct in which 2 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was added to laurylamine was obtained. Next, distilled water in an amount of two times the mass of the adduct obtained was added to the pressure-resistant reaction vessel, and 1 molar equivalent of nitric acid was added for neutralization. Thereafter, the pressure-resistant reaction vessel was heated to 85 to 95° C., and 1.1 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was blown, to perform a quaternization reaction. Finally, water was removed under reduced pressure with an evaporator under a condition of 70° C., and a quaternary ammonium compound E4 was obtained.
To a four-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, 1 molar equivalent of stearyldimethylamine was added, and heated to 85 to 95° C. Thereto was dropped and simultaneously stirred 1.1 molar equivalents of dimethyl sulfate, to perform a quaternization reaction, and thus a quaternary ammonium compound E5 was obtained.
To a four-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, 1 molar equivalent of octyldimethylamine was added, distilled water in an amount of two times the mass of octylamine was added, and 0.7 molar equivalents of phosphoric acid was added. Thereafter, the pressure-resistant reaction vessel was heated to 85 to 95° C., 1.1 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was blown, to perform a quaternization reaction, and thus a quaternary ammonium compound E6 was obtained.
To a pressure-resistant reaction vessel, 1 molar equivalent of laurylamine was added, purged with nitrogen, and then heated to 120 to 130° C. Thereinto was blown 8 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide, and thus an adduct in which 8 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was added to laurylamine was obtained. Next, distilled water in an amount of two times the mass of the adduct obtained was added to the pressure-resistant reaction vessel, and 1.0 molar equivalent of para-toluenesulfonic acid was added for neutralization. Thereafter, the pressure-resistant reaction vessel was heated to 85 to 95° C., 1.1 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was blown, to perform a quaternization reaction, and thus a quaternary ammonium compound E7 was obtained.
Didecyldimethylammonium chloride (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) was used.
To a pressure-resistant reaction vessel, 1 molar equivalent of laurylamine was added, purged with nitrogen, and then heated to 120 to 130° C. Thereinto was blown 32 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide, and thus an adduct in which 32 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was added to laurylamine was obtained. To a four-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, 1 molar equivalent of the adduct obtained was added, and heated to 85 to 95° C. Thereto was dropped and simultaneously stirred 1.1 molar equivalents of dimethyl sulfate, to perform a quaternization reaction, and thus a quaternary ammonium compound E9 was obtained.
(Synthesis of Quaternary Ammonium Compound e10)
To a pressure-resistant reaction vessel, 1 molar equivalent of hexylamine was added, purged with nitrogen, and then heated to 120 to 130° C. Thereinto was blown 2 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide, and thus an adduct in which 2 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was added to laurylamine was obtained. Next, 1 molar equivalent of the adduct obtained was added to a four-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, and heated to 85 to 95° C. Thereto was dropped and simultaneously stirred 1.1 molar equivalents of diethyl sulfate, to perform a quaternization reaction, and thus a quaternary ammonium compound E10 was obtained.
The amine compounds used here were the following amine compounds.
A1 tetradecylamine was used as the primary monoamine.
A2 diethanolamine was used as the secondary monoamine.
A3 N,N-dimethyldecylamine, A4 N-lauryldiethanolamine, or A5 triethanolamine was used as the tertiary monoamine.
These amine compounds used here were those manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
Tertiary monoamines a6 and a7 were synthesized as follows.
To a pressure-resistant reaction vessel, 1 molar equivalent of laurylamine was added, purged with nitrogen, and then heated to 120 to 130° C. Thereinto was blown 30 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide, and thus an adduct a6 in which 30 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was added to laurylamine was obtained.
To a pressure-resistant reaction vessel, 1 molar equivalent of laurylamine was added, purged with nitrogen, and then heated to 120 to 130° C. Thereinto was blown 50 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide, and thus an adduct a7 in which 50 molar equivalents of ethylene oxide was added to laurylamine was obtained.
Sulfur-containing compounds used here were B1 sodium thiosulfate, B2 ammonium thiosulfate, B3 sodium hydrogen sulfide, B4 sodium sulfide, B5 sodium tetrasulfide, B6 potassium sulfite, B7 sodium hydrogen sulfite, and b8 sodium sulfate.
These sulfur-containing compounds of B1 to B4, B6 to B7, and b8 used here were those manufactured by FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation. The sulfur-containing compound of B5 used here was one manufactured by NAGAO Co., Ltd.
A wood chip was used as the material including lignocellulose.
Laubholz, wood chip with hardwood (acacia:eucalyptus=7:3) as a raw material,
Nadelholz, wood chip with softwood (Pinus densiflora) as a raw material.
The above quaternary ammonium compounds, amine compounds, sulfur-containing compounds, and materials including lignocellulose were each used and variously evaluated.
Laubholz as a wood chip, and a digestion accelerator including a quaternary ammonium compound and an amine compound were used to perform digestion by a kraft method. First, Laubholz was subjected to a stainless sieve having an aperture of 710 μm, and Laubholz remaining on the sieve was dried at 60° C. for 24 hours. The digestion accelerator was prepared so that the contents of the quaternary ammonium compound E4 (pure content) and the amine compound A1 (pure content) relative to Laubholz (wood chip) were each 0.03% by mass and the mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound E4 (pure content) and the amine compound A1 (pure content) was 100:1. Specifically, 14.85 mg of the quaternary ammonium compound E4 (pure content) and 0.15 mg of the amine compound A1 (pure content), with respect to 50.0 g of Laubholz (wood chip), were placed in a vessel, and dissolved in distilled water, and thus the digestion accelerator to be used in Example 1 was obtained.
Next, 6.9 g (3.2 g in terms of pure content of single sodium sulfide) of a sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt and 11.2 g of sodium hydroxide were added to a beaker and distilled water was added thereto so that the total mass was 145 g, thereby obtaining an alkaline aqueous solution. The digestion accelerator prepared in advance was added to this aqueous solution, distilled water was added thereto so that the total mass was 150 g, and the resultant was stirred to obtain a digestion liquid.
Into a pot (MINI COLOR, manufactured by Texam Giken Co., Ltd.) were placed 50.0 g of Laubholz and 150 g of the digestion liquid prepared, and digestion was performed at 150° C. for 50 minutes.
After the digestion, the wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number were evaluated with respect to Example 1, and the results were shown in Table 2. The wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number were evaluated respectively by the following procedures.
The degree of progression of digestion of a wood piece (wood chip) can be determined by examining the wood piece residual rate (wood chip residual ratio). The wood piece residual rate can also be called wood chip residual ratio.
The wood piece residual rate was determined from the following expression.
Wood piece residual rate (%)=(Mass (g) of residue object after digestion/Mass (g) of sample before digestion)×100
Here, one subjected to the following treatment was adopted as a residue object after digestion. First, the mixture obtained by digestion was sieved. Next, a residue remaining on a stainless sieve having an aperture of 710 μm was washed with water, and such washing was repeated until the water used in washing was colorless. Thereafter, the residue was dried at 105° C. for 10 hours, and the resultant was adopted as a residue object. The sample before digestion here corresponds to a wood chip sieved before digestion and dried. For example, the sample before digestion of Example 1 is Laubholz sieved before digestion.
The evaluation criteria of the wood piece residual rate in the case of use of a kraft method and Laubholz were as follows.
Excellent: a wood piece residual rate of less than 0.5%,
Good: a wood piece residual rate of 0.5% or more and less than 1.5%,
Poor: a wood piece residual rate of 1.5% or more and less than 2.5%,
Bad: a wood piece residual rate of 2.5% or more.
The yield is the yield of the pulp obtained after digestion. It was determined from the following expression.
Yield (%)=(((i) Mass (g) of pulp recovered+(ii) Mass (g) of wood piece residual×½)/(iii) Mass (g) of sample before digestion)×100
The evaluation criteria of the yield in the case of use of a kraft method and Laubholz were as follows.
Excellent: a yield of 52.5% or more,
Good: a yield of less than 52.5% and 52.0% or more,
Poor: a yield of less than 52.0% and 51.5% or more,
Bad: a yield of less than 51.5%.
The Kappa number indicates the content of the residual lignin. The Kappa number of the pulp obtained after digestion is small because the content of the residual lignin is low. The Kappa number of the pulp obtained after digestion can be examined to determine the degree of progression of digestion of the wood piece (wood chip).
One subjected to the following treatment was adopted as pulp obtained after digestion. First, the mixture obtained by digestion was subjected to a stainless sieve having an aperture of 710 μm, and the mixture passing through the sieve was subjected to a finer stainless sieve having an aperture of 75 μm. The remaining residue in this sieve was washed with water, and such washing was repeated until the water used in washing was colorless. Thereafter, the residue was dried at 105° C. for 10 hours. This was defined as pulp. The Kappa number was determined by a method described in JIS P 8211(2011).
The evaluation criteria of the Kappa number in the case of use of a kraft method and Laubholz were as follows.
Excellent: a Kappa number of less than 15.5,
Good: a Kappa number of 15.5 or more and less than 16.0,
Poor: a Kappa number of 16.0 or more and less than 16.5,
Bad: a Kappa number of 16.5 or more.
The same method as in Example 1 was used to perform digestion and evaluation in each of Examples 2 to 17 and Comparative Examples 1 to 17 except that the types, the amounts of use, and the mass ratios of the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound were changed as shown in Table 2 and Table 3. In Comparative Example 1, digestion was performed without any digestion accelerator, and evaluation was made.
| Digestion accelerator |
| Content | |||
| Mass ratio of | (% by mass) | ||
| quaternary | of digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | ammonium | accelerator | Wood piece | ||||
| ammonium | Amine | compound/amine | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa | |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 1 | E4 | A1 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.3 | 15.5 |
| Excellent | Good | Good | |||||
| 2 | E4 | A2 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.2 | 15.5 |
| Excellent | Good | Good | |||||
| 3 | E4 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.4 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 4 | E4 | A4 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.4 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 5 | E4 | A5 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.3 | 15.4 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 6 | E4 | A6 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.1 | 15.8 |
| Excellent | Good | Good | |||||
| 7 | E1 | A4 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 52.3 | 15.4 |
| Good | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 8 | E2 | A4 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 52.5 | 15.4 |
| Good | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 9 | E3 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.5 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 10 | E5 | A5 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 52.2 | 15.6 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 11 | E6 | A5 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 52.2 | 15.6 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 12 | E7 | A1 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 1.0 | 52.1 | 15.7 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 13 | E8 | A2 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 1.1 | 52.0 | 15.7 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 14 | E3 | A3 | 10/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.3 | 15.5 |
| Excellent | Good | Good | |||||
| 15 | E3 | A3 | 1000/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.3 | 15.5 |
| Excellent | Good | Good | |||||
| 16 | E3 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 52.6 | 15.2 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 17 | E3 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.01 | 1.2 | 52.0 | 15.6 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| Digestion accelerator |
| Content (% | |||
| Mass ratio | by mass) of | ||
| of quaternary | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | ammonium | accelerator | Wood piece | ||||
| Comparative | ammonium | Amine | compound/amine | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 1 | — | — | 0/0 | 0 | 3.1 | 49.8 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 2 | E1 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 51.3 | 16.1 |
| Good | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 3 | E2 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 51.3 | 16.1 |
| Good | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 4 | E3 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.3 | 16.1 |
| Excellent | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 5 | E4 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.3 | 16.0 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 6 | E5 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 51.2 | 16.2 |
| Good | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 7 | E7 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.9 | 51.1 | 16.3 |
| Good | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 8 | E8 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 1.3 | 51.2 | 16.3 |
| Good | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 9 | — | A1 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 2.9 | 49.9 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 10 | — | A2 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 49.9 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 11 | — | A3 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 49.9 | 16.4 |
| Bad | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 12 | — | A4 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 2.9 | 49.9 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 13 | — | A5 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 49.8 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 14 | e9 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 1.6 | 51.3 | 16.3 |
| Poor | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 15 | e10 | A4 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 1.8 | 51.3 | 16.4 |
| Poor | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 16 | E3 | a6 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | Bad | 16.2 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 17 | E3 | a7 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.5 | 16.2 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
Nadelholz as a wood chip, and a digestion accelerator including a quaternary ammonium compound and an amine compound were used to perform digestion by a kraft method.
In Example 18, substantially the same procedure as in Example 1 was performed for digestion and evaluation except that the quaternary ammonium compound was E1, the amine compound was A4, the wood chip was Nadelholz, and the amounts of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt and the sodium hydroxide added were changed. In Example 18, 7.75 g (3.6 g in terms of pure content of single sodium sulfide) of a sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt and 12.6 g of sodium hydroxide were added to the digestion liquid.
The evaluation criteria in the case of use of a kraft method and Nadelholz were as follows.
Excellent: a wood piece residual rate of less than 0.5%,
Good: a wood piece residual rate of 0.5% or more and less than 1.5%,
Poor: a wood piece residual rate of 1.5% or more and less than 2.5%,
Bad: a wood piece residual rate of 2.5% or more.
Excellent: a yield of 52.5% or more,
Good: a yield of less than 52.5% and 52.0% or more,
Poor: a yield of less than 52.0% and 51.5% or more,
Bad: a yield of less than 51.5%
Excellent: a Kappa number of less than 29.0,
Good: a Kappa number of 29.0 or more and less than 29.5,
Poor: a Kappa number of 29.5 or more and less than 30.0,
Bad: a Kappa number of 30.0 or more.
The same method as in Example 18 was used to perform digestion and evaluation in each of Examples 19 to 22, and Comparative Examples 18 to 26 except that the types, the amounts of use, and the mass ratios of the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound were changed as shown in Table 4 and Table 5. In Comparative Example 18, digestion was performed without any digestion accelerator, and evaluation was made.
| Digestion accelerator |
| Content (% | |||
| Mass ratio | by mass) of | ||
| of quaternary | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | ammonium | accelerator | Wood piece | ||||
| ammonium | Amine | compound/amine | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa | |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 18 | E1 | A4 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 52.7 | 28.9 |
| Good | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 19 | E3 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.8 | 28.8 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 20 | E4 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.8 | 28.8 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 21 | E4 | A2 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 52.4 | 29.1 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 22 | E7 | A1 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.9 | 52.2 | 29.3 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| Digestion accelerator |
| Content (% | |||
| Mass ratio | by mass) of | ||
| of quaternary | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | ammonium | accelerator | Wood piece | ||||
| Comparative | ammonium | Amine | compound/amine | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 18 | — | — | 0/0 | 0 | 3.2 | 51.3 | 30.8 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 19 | E1 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 51.7 | 30.2 |
| Good | Poor | Bad | |||||
| 20 | E3 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.7 | 30.2 |
| Excellent | Poor | Bad | |||||
| 21 | E7 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 1.0 | 51.5 | 30.6 |
| Good | Poor | Bad | |||||
| 22 | — | A1 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 2.9 | 51.4 | 30.8 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 23 | — | A2 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 51.3 | 30.7 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 24 | — | A3 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 51.4 | 30.7 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 25 | e9 | A3 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 1.8 | 51.9 | 30.0 |
| Poor | Poor | Bad | |||||
| 26 | e10 | A4 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 1.7 | 51.8 | 29.9 |
| Poor | Poor | Poor | |||||
Nadelholz as a wood chip, and a digestion accelerator including a quaternary ammonium compound and an amine compound were used to perform digestion by a polysulfide method.
In Example 23, substantially the same procedure as in Example 1 was performed for digestion and evaluation except that the quaternary ammonium compound was E1, the amine compound was A4, the wood chip was Nadelholz, the amounts of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt and the sodium hydroxide added were changed, and a sodium tetrasulfide solution (manufactured by NAGAO Co., Ltd.) was newly used. In Example 23, 6.2 g (2.88 g in terms of pure content of single sodium sulfide) of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt, 12.6 g of sodium hydroxide, and 2.4 g (0.72 g in terms of pure content of single sodium tetrasulfide) of the sodium tetrasulfide solution were added to the digestion liquid.
The evaluation criteria in the case of use of a polysulfide method and Nadelholz were as follows.
Excellent: a wood piece residual rate of less than 0.5%,
Good: a wood piece residual rate of 0.5% or more and less than 1.5%,
Poor: a wood piece residual rate of 1.5% or more and less than 2.5%,
Bad: a wood piece residual rate of 2.5% or more.
Excellent: a yield of 52.5% or more,
Good: a yield of less than 52.5% and 52.0% or more,
Poor: a yield of less than 52.0% and 51.5% or more,
Bad: a yield of less than 51.5%.
Excellent: a Kappa number of less than 29.0,
Good: a Kappa number of 29.0 or more and less than 29.5,
Poor: a Kappa number of 29.5 or more and less than 30.0,
Bad: a Kappa number of 30.0 or more.
The same method as in Example 23 was used to perform digestion and evaluation in each of Examples 24 and 25, and Comparative Examples 27 to 31 except that the types, the amounts of use, and the mass ratios of the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound were changed as shown in Table 6 and Table 7. In Comparative Example 27, digestion was performed without any digestion accelerator, and evaluation was made. Each evaluation was made according to the same evaluation criteria as the evaluation criteria in Example 23.
| Digestion accelerator |
| Content (% | |||
| Mass ratio | by mass) of | ||
| of quaternary | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | ammonium | accelerator | Wood piece | ||||
| ammonium | Amine | compound/amine | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa | |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 23 | E1 | A4 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.6 | 28.6 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 24 | E3 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 52.8 | 28.4 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 25 | E8 | A2 | 100/1 | 0.03 | 0.8 | 52.4 | 29.3 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| Digestion accelerator |
| Content (% | |||
| Mass ratio | by mass) of | ||
| of quaternary | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | ammonium | accelerator | Wood piece | ||||
| Comparative | ammonium | Amine | compound/amine | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 27 | — | — | 0/0 | 0 | 3.1 | 51.4 | 30.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 28 | E1 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.8 | 29.9 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 29 | E3 | — | 100/0 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.9 | 29.9 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 30 | — | A2 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 3.1 | 51.6 | 30.5 |
| Bad | Poor | Bad | |||||
| 31 | — | A3 | 0/100 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 51.6 | 30.5 |
| Bad | Poor | Bad | |||||
Laubholz as a wood chip, and a digestion accelerator including a quaternary ammonium compound and an amine compound were used to perform digestion by a soda method.
In Example 26, the quaternary ammonium compound was E1, the amine compound was A4, the wood chip was Laubholz, the alkaline main agent was only sodium hydroxide, and the amounts thereof added were changed. In addition, preparation was made so that the contents of the quaternary ammonium compound E1 (pure content) and the amine compound A4 (pure content) relative to Laubholz (wood chip) were each 0.06% by mass and the mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound E1 (pure content) and the amine compound A4 (pure content) was 100:1. Specifically, 29.7 mg of the quaternary ammonium compound E1 (pure content) and 0.3 mg of the amine compound A4 (pure content), with respect to 50.0 g of Laubholz (wood chip), were placed in a vessel, and dissolved in water, and thus the digestion accelerator to be used in Example 26 was obtained. Other procedure was substantially the same as the procedure in Example 1 to perform digestion and evaluation. In Example 26, 16.2 g of sodium hydroxide was added to the digestion liquid.
The evaluation criteria in the case of use of a soda method and Laubholz were as follows.
Excellent: a wood piece residual rate of less than 1.0%,
Good: a wood piece residual rate of 1.0% or more and less than 1.5%,
Poor: a wood piece residual rate of 1.5% or more and less than 2.5%,
Bad: a wood piece residual rate of 2.5% or more.
Excellent: a yield of 52.0% or more,
Good: a yield of less than 52.0% and 51.5% or more,
Poor: a yield of less than 51.5% and 51.0% or more,
Bad: a yield of less than 51.0%.
Excellent: a Kappa number of less than 18.5,
Good: a Kappa number of 18.5 or more and less than 19.0,
Poor: a Kappa number of 19.0 or more and less than 19.5,
Bad: a Kappa number of 19.5 or more.
The same method as in Example 26 was used to perform digestion and evaluation in each of Examples 27 and 28 and Comparative Examples 32 to 36 except that the types, the amounts of use, and the mass ratios of the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound were changed as shown in Table 8 and Table 9, and the evaluation was made according to the same evaluation criteria as the evaluation criteria in Example 26. In Comparative Example 32, digestion was performed without any digestion accelerator, and evaluation was made.
| Digestion accelerator |
| Content (% | |||
| Mass ratio | by mass) of | ||
| of quaternary | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | ammonium | accelerator | Wood piece | ||||
| ammonium | Amine | compound/amine | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa | |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 26 | E1 | A4 | 100/1 | 0.06 | 0.8 | 52.1 | 18.6 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Good | |||||
| 27 | E4 | A3 | 100/1 | 0.06 | 0.7 | 52.2 | 18.6 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Good | |||||
| 28 | E8 | A1 | 100/1 | 0.06 | 1.3 | 51.8 | 18.9 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| Digestion accelerator |
| Content (% | |||
| Mass ratio | by mass) of | ||
| of quaternary | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | ammonium | accelerator | Wood piece | ||||
| Comparative | ammonium | Amine | compound/amine | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 32 | — | — | 0/0 | 0 | 3.8 | 50.9 | 20.0 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 33 | E1 | — | 100/0 | 0.06 | 0.9 | 51.2 | 19.3 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 34 | E4 | — | 100/0 | 0.06 | 0.8 | 51.2 | 19.2 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 35 | — | A4 | 0/100 | 0.06 | 3.5 | 50.9 | 19.9 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 36 | — | A3 | 0/100 | 0.06 | 3.6 | 50.9 | 19.8 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
Laubholz as a wood chip, and a digestion accelerator including a quaternary ammonium compound and a sulfur-containing compound were used to perform digestion by a kraft method. Laubholz was subjected to a stainless sieve having an aperture of 710 μm, and Laubholz remaining on the sieve was dried at 60° C. for 24 hours. The digestion accelerator was prepared so that the contents of the quaternary ammonium compound E3 (pure content) and the amine compound B1 (pure content) relative to Laubholz (wood chip) were each 0.03% by mass and the mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound E3 (pure content) and the sulfur-containing compound B1 (pure content) was 6:1. Specifically, 12.86 mg of the quaternary ammonium compound E3 (pure content) and 2.14 mg of the sulfur-containing compound B1 (pure content), with respect to 50.0 g of Laubholz (wood chip), were placed in a vessel, and dissolved in distilled water, and thus the digestion accelerator to be used in Example 29 was obtained
Next, 6.9 g (3.2 g in terms of pure content of single sodium sulfide) of a sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt and 11.2 g of sodium hydroxide were added to a beaker and distilled water was added thereto so that the total mass was 145 g, thereby obtaining an alkaline aqueous solution. The digestion accelerator prepared in advance was added to this aqueous solution, distilled water was added thereto so that the total mass was 150 g, and the resultant was stirred to obtain a digestion liquid.
Into a pot (MINI COLOR, manufactured by Texam Giken Co., Ltd.), 50.0 g of Laubholz and 150 g of the digestion liquid prepared were placed, and digestion was performed at 150° C. for 50 minutes.
After digestion, the wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number were evaluated with respect to Example 29, and the results were shown in Table 10. The wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number in Example 29 were evaluated according to the same evaluation criteria as the evaluation criteria in Example 1.
The same method as in Example 29 was used to perform digestion and evaluation in each of Examples 30 to 44 and Comparative Examples 37 to 44 except that the types, the amounts of use, and the mass ratios of the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound were changed as shown in Table 10 and Table 11.
The digestion accelerator of Comparative Example 44 was obtained by separately using the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur compound, unlike the digestion accelerator of Example 29. Specifically, only 12.86 mg of the quaternary ammonium compound E3 (pure content) was placed in a vessel, and dissolved in distilled water, and thus the digestion accelerator to be used in Comparative Example 44 was obtained. Next, 2.14 mg of the sulfur-containing compound B1 (pure content) not used in preparation of the digestion accelerator, 6.9 g (3.2 g in terms of pure content of single sodium sulfide) of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt, and 11.2 g of sodium hydroxide were added to a beaker, distilled water was added so that the total mass was 145 g, and thus an alkaline aqueous solution was obtained. The digestion accelerator prepared in advance was added to this aqueous solution, distilled water was added thereto so that the total mass was 150 g, and the resultant was stirred to obtain a digestion liquid. Into a pot (MIN COLOR, manufactured by Texam Giken Co., Ltd.) were placed 50.0 g of Laubholz and 150 g of the digestion liquid, and digestion was performed at 150° C. for 50 minutes. As described above, Comparative Example 44 was different from Example 29 in that the sulfur-containing compound B1 (pure content) was not used in preparation of the digestion accelerator and was used in preparation of the digestion liquid. The evaluation criteria were the same as the evaluation criteria in Example 1, as in Example 29.
| Digestion accelerator |
| Mass ratio | Content (% | ||
| of quaternary | by mass) of | ||
| ammonium | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | Sulfur- | compound/sulfur- | accelerator | Wood piece | |||
| ammonium | containing | containing | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa | |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 29 | E3 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.3 | 15.2 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 30 | E3 | B3 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.2 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 31 | E3 | B4 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.1 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 32 | E3 | B5 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.2 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 33 | E3 | B7 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.0 | 15.4 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 34 | E1 | B2 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 52.2 | 15.3 |
| Good | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 35 | E2 | B3 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 52.3 | 15.3 |
| Good | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 36 | E4 | B5 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.2 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 37 | E5 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.7 | 52.2 | 15.4 |
| Good | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 38 | E6 | B3 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.8 | 52.0 | 15.5 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 39 | E7 | B4 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 1.0 | 52.0 | 15.6 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 40 | E8 | B6 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 1.1 | 52.0 | 15.7 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 41 | E3 | B1 | 15/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.2 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 42 | E3 | B1 | 2/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.2 | 15.3 |
| Excellent | Good | Excellent | |||||
| 43 | E3 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 52.5 | 15.1 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 44 | E3 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.01 | 1.4 | 52.0 | 15.7 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| Digestion accelerator |
| Mass ratio | Content (% | ||
| of quaternary | by mass) of | ||
| ammonium | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | Sulfur- | compound/sulfur- | accelerator | Wood piece | |||
| Comparative | ammonium | containing | containing | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 37 | — | B1 | 0/1 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 51.2 | 16.4 |
| Bad | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 38 | — | B3 | 0/1 | 0.03 | 2.9 | 51.1 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 39 | — | B4 | 0/1 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 51.1 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 40 | — | B5 | 0/1 | 0.03 | 3.0 | 51.0 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 41 | — | B7 | 0/1 | 0.03 | 2.9 | 51.1 | 16.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 42 | e10 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 1.9 | 51.3 | 16.2 |
| Poor | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 43 | E3 | b8 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.3 | 16.2 |
| Excellent | Bad | Poor | |||||
| 44 | E3 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.3 | 16.2 |
| Excellent | Bad | Poor | |||||
Nadelholz as a wood chip, and a digestion accelerator including a quaternary ammonium compound and a sulfur-containing compound were used to perform digestion by a kraft method.
In Example 45, substantially the same procedure as in Example 18 was performed for digestion and evaluation except that the quaternary ammonium compound was E2, the sulfur-containing compound was B1, the wood chip was Nadelholz, and the amounts of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt and the sodium hydroxide added were changed. In Example 45, 7.75 g (3.6 g in terms of pure content of single sodium sulfide) of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt, and 12.6 g of sodium hydroxide were added to the digestion liquid. The wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number in Example 45 were evaluated according to the same evaluation criteria as the evaluation criteria in Example 18.
The same method as in Example 45 was used to perform digestion and evaluation in each of Examples 46 to 49 and Comparative Examples 45 to 50 except that the types, the amounts of use, and the mass ratios of the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound were changed as shown in Table 12 and Table 13. In Comparative Example 50, the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur compound were separately used. This Comparative Example was different from Example 46 in that the sulfur-containing compound B2 (pure content) was not used in preparation of the digestion accelerator and the sulfur-containing compound B2 (pure content) was used in preparation of the digestion liquid.
| Digestion accelerator |
| Mass ratio | Content (% | ||
| of quaternary | by mass) of | ||
| ammonium | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | Sulfur- | compound/sulfur- | accelerator | Wood piece | |||
| ammonium | containing | containing | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa | |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 45 | E2 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 52.6 | 28.9 |
| Good | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 46 | E3 | B2 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.7 | 28.7 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 47 | E4 | B5 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 52.6 | 28.8 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 48 | E6 | B4 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 52.4 | 29.1 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| 49 | E8 | B7 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 1.0 | 52.3 | 29.3 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| Digestion accelerator |
| Mass ratio | Content (% | ||
| of quaternary | by mass) of | ||
| ammonium | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | Sulfur- | compound/sulfur- | accelerator | Wood piece | |||
| Comparative | ammonium | containing | containing | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 45 | — | B1 | 0/1 | 0.03 | 3.3 | 51.4 | 30.7 |
| Bad | Bad | Good | |||||
| 46 | — | B5 | 0/1 | 0.03 | 3.4 | 51.4 | 30.8 |
| Bad | Bad | Excellent | |||||
| 47 | e9 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 1.8 | 51.8 | 30.1 |
| Poor | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 48 | e10 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 1.7 | 51.7 | 30.0 |
| Poor | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 49 | E3 | b8 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 51.6 | 30.0 |
| Good | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 50 | E3 | B2 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.6 | 30.0 |
| Excellent | Poor | Good | |||||
Nadelholz as a wood chip, and a digestion accelerator including a quaternary ammonium compound and a sulfur-containing compound were used to perform digestion by a polysulfide method.
In Example 50, substantially the same procedure as in Example 23 was performed for digestion and evaluation except that the quaternary ammonium compound was E2, the sulfur-containing compound was B3, the wood chip was Nadelholz, the amounts of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt and the sodium hydroxide added were changed, and a sodium tetrasulfide solution (manufactured by NAGAO Co., Ltd.) was newly used. In Example 50, 6.2 g (2.88 g in terms of pure content of single sodium sulfide) of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt, 12.6 g of sodium hydroxide, and 2.4 g (0.72 g in terms of pure content of single sodium tetrasulfide) of the sodium tetrasulfide solution were added to the digestion liquid. The wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number in Example 50 were evaluated according to the same evaluation criteria as the evaluation criteria in Example 23.
The same method as in Example 50 was used to perform digestion and evaluation in each of Examples 51 and 52 and Comparative Examples 51 to 55 except that the types, the amounts of use, and the mass ratios of the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound were changed as shown in Table 14 and Table 15. The wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number were evaluated according to the same evaluation criteria as the evaluation criteria in Example 23.
The digestion accelerator of Comparative Example 55 was obtained by separately using the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur compound, unlike the digestion accelerator of Example 51. Specifically, only 12.86 mg of the quaternary ammonium compound E4 (pure content) was placed in a vessel, and dissolved in distilled water, and thus the digestion accelerator to be used in Comparative Example 55 was obtained. Next, 2.14 mg of the sulfur-containing compound B1 (pure content) not used in preparation of the digestion accelerator, 6.2 g (2.88 g in terms of pure content of single sodium sulfide) of the sodium sulfide pentahydrate salt, 12.6 g of sodium hydroxide, and 2.4 g (0.72 g in terms of pure content of single sodium tetrasulfide) of the sodium tetrasulfide solution were added to a beaker, distilled water was added so that the total mass was 145 g, and thus an alkaline aqueous solution was obtained. The digestion accelerator prepared in advance was added to this aqueous solution, distilled water was added thereto so that the total mass was 150 g, and the resultant was stirred to obtain a digestion liquid. Into a pot (MIN COLOR, manufactured by Texam Giken Co., Ltd.) were placed 50.0 g of Nadelholz and 150 g of the digestion liquid, and digestion was performed at 150° C. for 50 minutes. As described above, Comparative Example 45 was different from Example 51 in that the sulfur-containing compound B1 (pure content) was not used in preparation of the digestion accelerator, but used in preparation of the digestion liquid.
| Digestion accelerator |
| Mass ratio | Content (% | ||
| of quaternary | by mass) of | ||
| ammonium | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | Sulfur- | compound/sulfur- | accelerator | Wood piece | |||
| ammonium | containing | containing | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa | |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 50 | E2 | B3 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 52.6 | 28.6 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 51 | E4 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 52.7 | 28.4 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 52 | E7 | B6 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.8 | 52.3 | 29.4 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| Digestion accelerator |
| Mass ratio | Content (% | ||
| of quaternary | by mass) of | ||
| ammonium | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | Sulfur- | compound/sulfur- | accelerator | Wood piece | |||
| Comparative | ammonium | containing | containing | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 51 | E2 | — | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.9 | 30.0 |
| Excellent | Poor | Bad | |||||
| 52 | E4 | — | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.9 | 29.8 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 53 | — | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 3.1 | 51.6 | 30.5 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 54 | — | B3 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 3.1 | 51.6 | 30.4 |
| Bad | Poor | Bad | |||||
| 55 | E4 | B1 | 6/1 | 0.03 | 0.4 | 51.8 | 29.8 |
| Good | Poor | Poor | |||||
Laubholz as a wood chip, and a digestion accelerator including a quaternary ammonium compound and a sulfur-containing compound were used to perform digestion by a soda method. In Example 53, the quaternary ammonium compound was E2, the sulfur-containing compound was B4, the wood chip was Laubholz, the alkaline main agent was only sodium hydroxide, and the amounts thereof added were changed. In addition, preparation was made so that the contents of the quaternary ammonium compound E2 (pure content) and the sulfur-containing compound B4 (pure content) relative to Laubholz (wood chip) were each 0.06% by mass and the mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound E2 (pure content) and the sulfur-containing compound B4 (pure content) was 6:1. Specifically, 25.71 mg of the quaternary ammonium compound E2 (pure content) and 4.29 mg of the sulfur-containing compound B4 (pure content), with respect to 50.0 g of Laubholz (wood chip), were placed in a vessel, and dissolved in distilled water, and thus the digestion accelerator to be used in Example 53 was obtained. Other procedure was substantially the same as the procedure in Example 26 to perform digestion and evaluation. Here, 16.2 g of sodium hydroxide was added to the digestion liquid. The wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number were evaluated according to the same evaluation criteria as the evaluation criteria in Example 26.
The same method as in Example 53 was used to perform digestion and evaluation in each of Examples 54 and 55 and Comparative Examples 56 to 61 except that the types, the amounts of use, and the mass ratios of the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound a were changed as shown in Table 16 and Table 17. In Comparative Example 61, the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur compound were separately used. This Comparative Example was different from Example 54 in that the sulfur-containing compound B2 (pure content) was not used in preparation of the digestion accelerator and the sulfur-containing compound B2 (pure content) was used in preparation of the digestion liquid. The wood piece residual rate, the yield, and the Kappa number were evaluated according to the same evaluation criteria as the evaluation criteria in Example 26.
| Digestion accelerator |
| Mass ratio | Content (% | ||
| of quaternary | by mass) of | ||
| ammonium | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | Sulfur- | compound/sulfur- | accelerator | Wood piece | |||
| ammonium | containing | containing | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa | |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 53 | E2 | B4 | 6/1 | 0.06 | 0.9 | 52.1 | 18.6 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Good | |||||
| 54 | E3 | B2 | 6/1 | 0.06 | 0.7 | 52.0 | 18.4 |
| Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | |||||
| 55 | E7 | B2 | 6/1 | 0.06 | 1.4 | 51.5 | 18.9 |
| Good | Good | Good | |||||
| Digestion accelerator |
| Mass ratio | Content (% | ||
| of quaternary | by mass) of | ||
| ammonium | digestion | Evaluation item |
| Quaternary | Sulfur- | compound/sulfur- | accelerator | Wood piece | |||
| Comparative | ammonium | containing | containing | relative to | residual | Yield | Kappa |
| Example | compound | compound | compound | wood chip | rate (%) | (%) | number |
| 56 | E2 | — | — | 0.06 | 0.9 | 51.1 | 19.4 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 57 | E3 | — | — | 0.06 | 0.8 | 51.2 | 19.3 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 58 | — | B2 | — | 0.06 | 3.9 | 50.6 | 19.9 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 59 | — | B4 | — | 0.06 | 3.9 | 50.7 | 19.8 |
| Bad | Bad | Bad | |||||
| 60 | E3 | B2 | 6/1 | 0.06 | 0.9 | 51.2 | 19.3 |
| Excellent | Poor | Poor | |||||
| 61 | E3 | B2 | 6/1 | 0.06 | 0.9 | 51.3 | 19.3 |
| Excellent | Poor | Good | |||||
It was found that the digestion accelerators of Examples 1 to 55 each exhibited favorable wood piece residual rate, yield, and Kappa number in digestion by a kraft method, digestion by a polysulfide method, and digestion by a soda method.
As described above, the digestion accelerator of the present disclosure can efficiently digest a material including lignocellulose.
A digestion accelerator including:
The digestion accelerator according to Supplementary Note 1, wherein a mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound is 5:1 to 10000:1.
A digestion accelerator including:
The digestion accelerator according to Supplementary Note 3, wherein the sulfur-containing compound includes at least one compound selected from the group consisting of thiosulfate, hydrogen thiosulfate, sulfite, hydrogen sulfite, disulfite, dithionite, dithionate, disulfate, peroxosulfate, peroxodisulfate, and polythionate.
The digestion accelerator according to Supplementary Note 4, wherein a mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound is 1:2 to 100:1.
A method for producing pulp, the method including a digestion step of adding at least one main agent selected from the group consisting of an alkaline main agent and a sulfite-based main agent, and a digestion accelerator, to digest a material including lignocellulose, wherein
The method for producing pulp according to Supplementary Note 6, wherein a content of the digestion accelerator is 0.001% by mass to 1.0% by mass relative to the material including the lignocellulose.
The foregoing describes some example embodiments for explanatory purposes. Although the foregoing discussion has presented specific embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. This detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the invention is defined only by the included claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-106468, filed on Jun. 30, 2022, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
1. A digestion accelerator comprising:
a quaternary ammonium compound represented by formula (1); and
at least one amine compound selected from the group consisting of a primary monoamine represented by formula (2), a secondary monoamine represented by formula (3), and a tertiary monoamine represented by formula (4),
wherein, in formula (1),
R1 is an alkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, or a hydroxyalkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms,
R2 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)nY group,
R3 and R4 are each independently an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, an aryl group, a benzyl group optionally having an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a phenethyl group optionally having an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a glycidyl group, or an (A1O)mY group,
N represents a nitrogen atom,
Xp− represents a counterion, and is an inorganic anion or an organic anion, and p represents a valence of an ion,
A1O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Y is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and
n is an integer of 1 to 15 and m is an integer of 1 to 15;
in formula (2), R5 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A2O)kZ group, A2O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and k is an integer of 1 to 6;
in formula (3), R6 and R7 are each independently an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A3O)rZ group, A3O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and r is an integer of 1 to 12; and
in formula (4), R8 and R9 are each independently an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A4O)tZ group, A4O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and t is an integer of 1 to 12, and
R10 is an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, or an (A5O)uZ group, A5O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, Z is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and u is an integer of 1 to 12.
2. The digestion accelerator according to claim 1, wherein a mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the amine compound is 5:1 to 10000:1.
3. A digestion accelerator comprising:
a quaternary ammonium compound represented by formula (1); and
a sulfur-containing compound that generates a sulfide ion, a polysulfide ion, or a hydrogen sulfide ion in the presence of the quaternary ammonium compound,
wherein, in formula (1),
R1 is an alkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, or a hydroxyalkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms,
R2 is an alkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 22 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 22 carbon atoms, or an (A1O)nY group,
R3 and R4 are each independently an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an alkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, a hydroxyalkenyl group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, an aryl group, a benzyl group optionally having an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a phenethyl group optionally having an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, a glycidyl group, or an (A1O)mY group,
N represents a nitrogen atom,
Xp− represents a counterion, and is an inorganic anion or an organic anion, and p represents a valence of an ion,
A1O is an alkyleneoxy group having 2 to 4 carbon atoms, and Y is a hydrogen atom or an acyl group, and
n is an integer of 1 to 15 and m is an integer of 1 to 15.
4. The digestion accelerator according to claim 3, wherein the sulfur-containing compound comprises at least one compound selected from the group consisting of thiosulfate, hydrogen thiosulfate, sulfite, hydrogen sulfite, disulfite, dithionite, dithionate, disulfate, peroxosulfate, peroxodisulfate, and polythionate.
5. The digestion accelerator according to claim 3, wherein a mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound is 1:2 to 100:1.
6. A method for producing pulp, the method comprising a digestion step of adding at least one main agent selected from the group consisting of an alkaline main agent and a sulfite-based main agent, and a digestion accelerator, to digest a material including lignocellulose,
wherein the digestion accelerator is the digestion accelerator according to claim 1.
7. The method for producing pulp according to claim 6, wherein a content of the digestion accelerator is 0.001% by mass to 1.0% by mass relative to the material including the lignocellulose.
8. The digestion accelerator according to claim 4, wherein a mass ratio between the quaternary ammonium compound and the sulfur-containing compound is 1:2 to 100:1.
9. A method for producing pulp, the method comprising a digestion step of adding at least one main agent selected from the group consisting of an alkaline main agent and a sulfite-based main agent, and a digestion accelerator, to digest a material including lignocellulose,
wherein the digestion accelerator is the digestion accelerator according to claim 3.
10. The method for producing pulp according to claim 9, wherein a content of the digestion accelerator is 0.001% by mass to 1.0% by mass relative to the material including the lignocellulose.