US20260049374A1
2026-02-19
19/016,978
2025-01-10
Smart Summary: A new mixture combines a sulfidizing agent with an alkalizing agent for use in mineral flotation processes. This mixture is designed to prevent the production of hydrogen sulfide, which can be harmful. By preparing the mixture in this way, it can be used safely in mining operations, even in enclosed spaces like caves or near populated areas. The process ensures that workers and nearby communities are protected from toxic gases. Overall, this innovation enhances safety in mining activities. 🚀 TL;DR
The present invention relates to a process and mixture for the safe dosing of a sulfidizing agent in a mineral flotation process that comprises the prior preparation of a mixture of sulfidizing agent with at least one alkalizing agent. In this way, the production of hydrogen sulfide is prevented, allowing the mixture to be safely used in mining operations located in enclosed places such as caves or in operations close to populated areas.
Get notified when new applications in this technology area are published.
C22B15/0071 » CPC main
Obtaining copper; Hydrometallurgy; Leaching or slurrying with acids or salts thereof containing sulfur
C22B3/44 » CPC further
Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes; Treatment or purification of solutions, e.g. obtained by leaching by chemical processes
C22B15/00 IPC
Obtaining copper
The present invention relates to a process and mixture for the safe dosing of a sulfidizing agent in a mineral flotation process.
Traditionally, two methods have been employed for processing minerals in order to recover metals from their ores. In the case of ores composed of metal oxides, the recovery process has involved a sequence of steps that include leaching, followed by solvent extraction and finally electroextraction, generating pure metal cathodes as the final product.
In this methodology, the ore is initially subjected to a crushing stage to achieve an optimal size that allows for efficient processing operation. Subsequently, this crushed ore is placed in a specially designed heap, the base of which has been previously prepared to facilitate the collection and drainage of the resulting leaching solutions.
The heap composed of the previously crushed ore is then subjected to an irrigation process using a leaching solution, generally based on sulfuric acid. This leaching agent has the ability to dissolve the copper present in the ore, allowing for its separation and recovery.
In the case of ores composed of metal sulfides, the conventional approach for their recovery involves a process that includes initial crushing, followed by a froth flotation stage aimed at obtaining a sulfide concentrate. Subsequently, this concentrate undergoes a pyrometallurgical purification process.
In recent years, there have been significant advances in the development of hydrometallurgical processes that have allowed for the exploration of new pathways for processing sulfide minerals. In particular, there has been a focus on leaching and electroextraction of these minerals, highlighting bacterial leaching of copper sulfides and alkaline leaching of sulfide minerals.
In the case of bacterial leaching, the interaction with bacteria and the iron content present in the minerals plays a crucial role. These bacteria facilitate the oxidation of certain species of copper sulfides into soluble copper sulfate. Subsequently, this soluble copper sulfate can be recovered through solvent extraction and electroextraction, thus obtaining high-purity copper.
One of the complexities that certain mining operations must face throughout their activity cycle lies in the dual composition of the minerals, presenting as a combination of sulfides and oxides. This raises the dilemma of choosing between processing the mixture through flotation, which entails a potential loss of the oxides, or employing the hydrometallurgical leaching route, which may imply a decrease in the yield of the sulfides.
There are several mineral flotation processing plants that are fed with sulfide minerals mixed with oxides, or sulfides that have been oxidized on their surface and therefore cannot be recovered in normal flotation processes.
Altered or superficially oxidized sulfides behave in the flotation process like oxides, preventing the adsorption of collectors and, therefore, cannot be recovered in the flotation process.
In some cases, “sulfidization” is an important tool to improve the recovery of some oxides during the froth flotation of sulfides. In this case, a sulfidizing agent, such as sodium hydrosulfide, sodium sulfide, or polysulfides of different metals, is added. This incorporation is carried out during froth flotation or just before feeding the ground mineral pulp to the flotation cells. The purpose is to modify the surface of the oxides or sulfide minerals with superficial oxidation, allowing the sulfide collectors to adhere to the mineral surface and convert the mineral particles into hydrophobic ones, so that they can be recovered through normal sulfide flotation.
This methodology presents a notable advantage by enabling the recovery of significant amounts of metal that would otherwise be lost. Most notably, this improvement can be achieved without requiring investments in the acquisition of new infrastructure or equipment. In fact, the only distinction from the conventional flotation technique lies in the incorporation of the sulfidation agent into the process.
The implementation of sulfidization basically requires developing a product distribution system in the flotation circuit, in addition to adding safety controls, such as flow control and monitoring of hydrogen sulfide gas concentration in the environment, to ensure safe operation of the process.
Generally, in the specific case of sodium hydrosulfide, it is required to reach doses of approximately 80 grams per ton of ore. For example, copper flotation plants that use the addition of sodium hydrosulfide prior to or during flotation, where improvements in copper recovery can range from 2% to 8%.
In most copper ores, there are usually pyrite minerals. To obtain a clean concentrate free of iron contamination, lime is added to the flotation process. This raises the pH value to a level at which pyrite is depressed, meaning it does not float and is separated along with the tailings. Generally, this pH value is around 8 or 9.
To achieve the depression of pyrite, lime is normally incorporated during the grinding stage of the flotation process. In some cases, a new dosing is performed during the flotation stages.
Consequently, most plants carry out the flotation of their minerals in a pH range of approximately 8 to 9. Likewise, during the grinding stage, pH values range from 7 to 9.
Traditional sulfidization during the flotation process, where, for example, sodium hydrosulfide or another sulfidizing agent is added, manages to recover some minerals that oxidize on the surface and cannot be recovered with traditional collector reagents.
The Chilean patent application No. 201800471 discloses that it is possible to recover minerals that are easily soluble, even without the addition of an acid, by adding an ionizing agent in the grinding process.
It has been observed that minerals such as chalcanthite (CuSO4·5H2O) or brochantite (Cu4(SO4)(OH)6) are normally lost in traditional flotation circuits.
It has also been observed that atacamite minerals Cu2Cl(OH)3 dissolve easily during grinding. For example, in an ore from the Atacama Region in Chile, which contains 0.41% atacamite mineral prior to grinding, when analyzed after grinding, it was found that the atacamite content had decreased to only 0.18%.
Some other plant feedings, such as minerals coming from old tailings, which still have a high copper content, sufficient to be processed, have a natural pH value of approximately 5, a condition in which part of the metal is present as soluble metal sulfate.
In most copper processing plants, lime is added during the crushing stage to depress pyrite. If this occurs, the dissolved copper precipitates as metal hydroxide, and as metal hydroxide, this metal is not recovered later in the flotation process, even if a sulfidizing agent is added to the flotation after this precipitation occurs.
The patent application JP2010229542 describes a method for separating pyrite from a copper-containing ore. In this method, the flotation of the ore is carried out, adding a flotation agent to the pulp and adjusting the pH to an alkaline value, specifically to pH 10 or higher.
The U.S. Pat. No. 1,483,270 describes the sulfidation process to increase copper recovery by floating non-sulfide ores.
The Chilean patent CL201800471 describes a process to improve copper recovery in flotation operations of minerals containing sulfides and/or easily soluble copper oxides by adding an ionizing sulfide.
The U.S. Pat. No. 4,008,072 A describes a process in which an alkaline sulfide is added in a specially designed reactor to an acidic leaching pulp to precipitate sulfides and recover them by flotation. This patent also indicates that sulfidization is “highly successful in processing some ores, such as lead ores,” but that “sulfidation has been of limited utility concerning copper ores.”
The German patent DE3690783 describes a process for concentrating copper oxide ore by flotation that involves pre-sulfidation with molten sulfur.
Some sulfidizing agents, such as alkaline sulfides like sodium hydrosulfide, can under certain pH dosing conditions release hydrogen sulfide gas, especially if dosed in acidic environments. While the mining industry uses sodium hydrosulfide on a large scale to depress copper in selective copper-molybdenum flotation processes in doses much higher than those used in sulfidization, plants generally have safety concerns regarding the incorporation of a sulfidizing agent in their processes, since if for any reason the pH of the pulp were to become acidic, for example, due to changes in lime dosing or changes in the mineralogical composition of the ore fed to the plant, there could be a risk of hydrogen sulfide gas emission, which would affect the safety of the operation. To mitigate these risks, gas measurement systems are generally installed that stop the dosing of the sulfidizing agent in the presence of hydrogen sulfide gas.
Some mining operations have their processing plants located very close to populated centers, so they try to avoid any odor problems in their processes to not disturb the coexistence with nearby communities.
Other mining operations have their flotation processes installed underground in caverns or in closed buildings with little ventilation. In these cases, ensuring air quality inside the flotation cavern or building becomes very important, so finding a way to safely dose a sulfidizing agent, without the risk of hydrogen sulfide gas emission, represents a significant advancement in safety.
In some operations, it has been demonstrated that sulfidization would generate significant improvements in process efficiency, but given the characteristics of the plant, for example, its location near a populated center or its location within an underground cavern with few ventilation possibilities, these operations prefer to simply forgo copper recovery by not applying a sulfidizing agent to avoid exposing themselves to the risks that such a process could entail, either to their collaborators working in the flotation plant or by affecting nearby communities due to gas and odor emissions.
On the other hand, sulfidizing agents are generally sulfurated products in aqueous solution that have a relatively high crystallization point, such as sodium hydrosulfide at 42%, which has a crystallization point in its pure form of around 15° C. and therefore must be handled with great care to avoid crystallization in the dosing or storage process, especially in operations located at high altitudes, as is the case with the Chilean mining industry.
The problem of product crystallization is particularly exacerbated when there are other salts present or when the product is mixed with alkaline products such as sodium hydroxide, lime, etc., either generating a solid directly or a highly viscous pulp, depending on the mixing proportions.
Considering the above, there is a need to have a process that allows for the incorporation of sulfidizing agents to improve copper production, but that at the same time can be used in mining operations close to populated areas or underground operations, safely and without problems of crystallization and/or increased viscosity of the sulfidizing agent before being incorporated into the mineral mixture.
The present invention provides a process and a mixture for the safe dosing of a sulfidizing agent such as sodium hydrosulfide, sodium sulfide, potassium hydrosulfide, potassium sulfide, or calcium sulfide, polysulfides of the same in the flotation process, especially in operations where this type of reagents is normally not used due to safety restrictions to avoid the emission of hydrogen sulfide gas during the process.
The inventors developed a process where, instead of dosing the sulfidizing agent directly into the flotation process after grinding, as is traditionally done in the industry, this sulfidizing agent is mixed in a prior stage with lime slurry. In this way, lime is added, which allows for the depression of the present pyrite while maintaining the medium at an alkaline pH that prevents the formation of hydrogen sulfide.
Surprisingly, it was found that in the proportions that sulfidizing agents are usually dosed into the flotation process to recover altered or oxidized copper and the lime used to depress pyrite, and under the conditions of lime and water proportions of the lime slurry that are typically used in flotation plants, it is possible to mix the sulfidizing agent with the lime slurry without generating a crystallization problem or significant rheological change in the obtained lime slurry. Therefore, if an ionizing sulfide or a sulfidizing agent, such as sodium hydrosulfide, sodium sulfide, potassium hydrosulfide, potassium sulfide, ammonium hydrosulfide, or ammonium sulfide, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, or ammonium polysulfides are added to the lime slurry dosed to the flotation plant, instead of dosing the sulfidizing agent to the flotation process or to the mill as described in the literature, the risk of hydrogen sulfide gas emission in the process is completely eliminated, since the lime slurry, fed in a proportion much higher than that of the sulfidizing agent, ensures that the pulp and the sulfidizing agent are always at an appropriate pH to not release hydrogen sulfide gas. Thus, if the addition of lime to the process were to be accidentally stopped, the addition of the sulfidizing agent would also immediately stop, eliminating any possibility of dosing in an acidic environment.
In this way, by mixing the sulfidizing agent beforehand with lime slurry in proportions that avoid a rheological change in the lime slurry, a sulfidizing agent can be safely dosed into the flotation process without the risk of hydrogen sulfide gas emission and without the need to modify the existing plant.
Furthermore, the dosing of the sulfidizing agent over the lime slurry ensures that at all times, this dosing occurs over an alkaline pulp or solution, thus avoiding the formation of hydrogen sulfide gas in the process.
By sulfidizing in this manner, several advantages are visualized, some of which are listed below:
The described process eliminates the risk of hydrogen sulfide gas emission in the flotation process.
By dosing the sulfidizing agent in this way, there is no need to install reagent distribution pipes in the plant, as the existing lime dosing system is used.
It allows the sulfidization process to be applied in operations where, due to location characteristics, either near a populated center or within a poorly ventilated cavern, under normal conditions, a sulfidizing agent could not be directly applied to the process as is traditionally done.
There are no problems of increased viscosity or crystallization of the sulfidizing agent in plant operations where lime doses are approximately 10 times higher than the doses of the sulfidizing agent.
The studies conducted showed that a mixture of a sulfidizing agent, in this case sodium hydrosulfide, with calcium oxide in lime slurry at concentrations of between 5 and 25% CaO in proportions of 0.1 to 10 up to 1 is to 10 can be used without significantly affecting the viscosity of the slaked lime slurry, thus allowing for a joint dosing.
An 8% lime slurry in water was prepared, and sodium hydrosulfide was added in a proportion of one to ten in relation to the lime dose.
A flotation test was conducted in a 2-liter laboratory flotation cell with a mineral composed of 92% copper sulfide mineral and 8% oxidized mineral, with an overall grade of 0.7% copper.
Table 1 shows the results obtained.
| TABLE 1 | |
| Copper Recovery | |
| (15 minutes of flotation) | |
| Cal without sulfidizing agent | 80% | |
| Cal with sulfidizing agent (10:1) | 88% | |
Additionally, tests were conducted to evaluate the fluidity of the mixtures of [slaked lime slurry/NaSH] and [slaked lime slurry/sulfide mixture].
Slurries of lime were prepared at 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% using lime with 80% purity, which is commonly used in the plants.
Furthermore, two solutions of sulfiding agent were prepared, NaSH at 42% and a solution of a sulfide mixture at 38%.
Tables 2 and 3 show the results.
| TABLE 2 | |
| % dry base cal in water |
| Temperature 20° C. | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
| Weight ratio (NaSH solution | |||||
| dry base/calcium hydroxide | |||||
| dry base) | |||||
| 1:20 | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Thick |
| Pulp | Pulp | ||||
| 1:15 | Fluid | Fluid | Fluido | Fluid | Thick |
| Fluid | Pulp | Pulp | |||
| 1:10 | Fluid | Fluido | Fluid | Fluid | Thick |
| Fluid | Pulp | Pulp | |||
| 1:5 | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Thick | Thick |
| Pulp | Pulp | ||||
| TABLE 3 | |
| % Dry base cal in water |
| Temperature 20° C. | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
| Weight ratio (Dry base sulfide | |||||
| mixture/Dry base cal) | |||||
| 1:20 | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Thick |
| Pulp | Pulp | ||||
| 1:15 | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Thick |
| Pulp | pulp | ||||
| 1:10 | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Thick | Thick |
| Pulp | Pulp | ||||
| 1:5 | Fluid | Fluid | Fluid | Thick | Thick |
| pulp | pulp | ||||
In both cases, for concentrations and proportions greater than those indicated, the formed mixture begins to increase its viscosity until total solidification, which prevents its use and handling.
The pH of the slaked lime slurry is approximately 12.5 and that of the sulfidizing agent is around 13. Therefore, the formed mixture has a pH of at least 12. This value prevents the production of hydrogen sulfide, so the developed mixture allows for its safe use in mining operations located in enclosed places such as caves or in operations close to populated areas.
The preceding specification is considered solely illustrative of the principles of the invention. The scope of the claims should not be limited by the embodiments provided as examples in the previous section, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the descriptive memory as a whole.
1. Process for the dosing of a sulfidizing agent or ionizing sulfide in a mineral flotation process in a safe and manageable manner, CHARACTERIZED in that it comprises the prior preparation of a mixture of sulfidizing agent with at least one alkalizing agent.
2. The process according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED in that the ionizing sulfide or the sulfidizing agent is selected from the group consisting of sodium hydrosulfide, sodium sulfide, potassium hydrosulfide, potassium sulfide, ammonium hydrosulfide or ammonium sulfide, potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium or ammonium polysulfides or a mixture thereof.
3. The process according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED in that the alkalizing agent is slaked lime slurry.
4. The process according to claim 3, CHARACTERIZED in that the sulfidizing agent is added directly in the slaked lime slurry preparation plant.
5. The process according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED in that the slaked lime slurry is prepared first and then mixed with the sulfidizing agent.
6. The process according to claim 4, CHARACTERIZED in that the mixture of slaked lime slurry and the sulfidizing agent is carried out in the slaked lime dosing tank or just before dosing the lime to the flotation stage or to the grinding stage.
7. The process according to claim 4, CHARACTERIZED in that the mixture of slaked lime slurry and the sulfidizing agent is carried out outside the flotation zone in a ventilated environment.
8. The process according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED in that the slaked lime is prepared in a proportion between 5% and 30% lime with 95% to 70% water.
9. The process according to claim 4, CHARACTERIZED in that the mixture of the sulfidizing agent with slaked lime slurry can be dosed at different stages of the flotation process.
10. The process according to claim 8, CHARACTERIZED in that the mixture of the sulfidizing agent with the slaked lime slurry is dosed at the grinding stage.
11. The process according to claim 8, CHARACTERIZED in that the mixture of the sulfidizing agent with the slaked lime slurry is dosed at the flotation stage.
12. The process according to claim 8, CHARACTERIZED in that the mixture of the sulfidizing agent with the slaked lime slurry is dosed between the grinding stage and the flotation stage, in one or more additions.
13. The process according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED in that the dose of the sulfidizing agent must be less than a dose that generates depression of the sulfide to be recovered.
14. The process according to any of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED in that the sulfidizing agent is sodium hydrosulfide.
15. The process according to claim 13, CHARACTERIZED in that sodium hydrosulfide is added to the slaked lime slurry in a dose between 20 and 300 grams on a dry basis per ton of mineral fed to the process, preferably between 60 and 100 grams on a dry basis per ton of mineral.
16. The process according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED in that the metal to be recovered is copper.
17. The process according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED in that the sulfidizing agent is mixed with an alkaline compound other than lime, such as sodium hydroxide.
18. The process according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED in that the sulfidizing agent is mixed with an alkaline compound other than lime, such as sodium bicarbonate.
19. Mixture for a mineral flotation process, CHARACTERIZED in that it comprises a sulfidizing agent and an alkalizing agent.
20. The mixture for a mineral flotation process according to claim 19, CHARACTERIZED in that the alkalizing agent is selected from slaked lime slurry, sodium hydroxide, sodium bicarbonate or a mixture thereof.
21. The mixture for a mineral flotation process according to claim 20, CHARACTERIZED in that the alkalizing agent is slaked lime slurry.
22. The mixture for a mineral flotation process according to claim 21, CHARACTERIZED in that the mixture of slaked lime slurry with the sulfidizing agent is carried out in a proportion of (lime on a dry basis):(sulfidizing agent on a dry basis) between 22:1 and 4:1.
23. The mixture for a mineral flotation process according to claim 21, CHARACTERIZED in that the slaked lime slurry is prepared in a concentration of lime in water between 4% and 20% by weight.
24. The mixture for a mineral flotation process according to claim 21, CHARACTERIZED in that it has a pH of at least 12.
25. Use of the mixture according to claim 19, CHARACTERIZED in that it serves for the flotation of minerals safely avoiding the emission of hydrogen sulfide, keeping the sulfidizing agent in solution and without crystallizing.
26. The use according to claim 25, CHARACTERIZED in that it serves for the use of a sulfidizing agent in plants located in underground caves and/or near populated areas.