Unified Resolution-as-Evidence Protocol and System for Policy-Enforced DNS Resolution with Knowledge Graph Injection, Global Identity and Object-Key Anchoring, and Time-Value Minting Based on a Pre-Established Identifier Reservoir.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED MATERIALS

This application is a continuation-in-part of the application(s) identified in the Application Data Sheet (ADS) filed herewith, and claims the benefit of domestic priority under 35 U.S.C. Section 120 and 37 C.F.R. Section 1.78 to such application(s), including any continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part chain properly identified in the ADS. The entire disclosure of each application identified in the ADS is incorporated herein by reference to the extent not inconsistent with the present disclosure. In the event of any inconsistency between this specification and the ADS regarding any claim for domestic benefit, the ADS shall control.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

Not applicable.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Overview. This specification describes a DNS-adjacent, policy-governed identifier resolution layer for BEI domain names and related identifiers. In exemplary implementations, standard DNS mechanisms are used for discovery (e.g., HTTPS/SVCB/URI records) to locate a resolver gateway endpoint, while governance, authorization, selective disclosure, and receipt issuance occur in the resolver gateway.

References to specific domain names (e.g., BEIDNS.org, BEIDNS.APP) are illustrative and non-limiting.

The disclosure relates to network name resolution, domain name system (DNS) security and policy enforcement, cryptographic attestation, decentralized and federated identity, object identification, auditability, and time-value accounting and settlement.

BACKGROUND

DNS was designed primarily to map human-readable names to resource records such as IP addresses. Modern Internet and intranet deployments increasingly require: (i) fine-grained, policy-driven access and disclosure controls; (ii) cryptographically verifiable evidence of resolution decisions; (iii) audit trails for compliance, dispute resolution, and incident response; and (iv) mechanisms that can bind resolution events to identity, objects, and value-transfer systems.

Existing DNS security mechanisms provide important primitives—e.g., DNSSEC for integrity and authenticity, and encrypted transports such as DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) and DNS-over-TLS (DOT)—but generally do not standardize a resolver output that functions as a portable, third-party-verifiable evidence receipt of the resolution decision.

Separately, decentralized identifiers (DIDs) and blockchains may provide identity and immutable anchoring, and knowledge graphs may provide entity semantics; however, these are typically external to DNS resolution. In addition, time-value representations (e.g., tokenizing verified time) exist but do not integrate a DNS-rooted, policy-enforced resolution pathway that produces a standardized evidence receipt and supports bounded corrective rollback.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, a resolver (or gateway) upgrades the DNS resolution process into a policy-enforced, evidence-producing protocol that outputs a standardized “Resolution Receipt” (RR). The RR includes (by way of example) a decision reason code, a policy-container version identifier, a signature chain, and one or more audit anchors. In some embodiments, the RR further includes: (i) time-duration and time-value fields that support minting or accounting of time-value units; (ii) knowledge-graph entity identifiers and confidence scores; (iii) global identity root identifiers (GI); and (iv) global object keys (GOK) for resources or events.

In another aspect, the system supports scope-based delegation via a Scope Token that encodes permitted audiences, time windows, field-level disclosure rules (minimum disclosure), purpose codes, and policy version constraints. In another aspect, the system supports lifecycle governance and bounded rollback, such as limiting rollback depth to three layers and the rollback window to seventy-two hours, while preserving immutable audit evidence.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an end-to-end resolution-as-evidence flow producing an RR and optional audit anchors.

FIG. 2 illustrates a policy-container versioning and enforcement pipeline at a TLD or basepoint scope.

FIG. 3 illustrates a Scope Token structure for range-based delegation and minimum disclosure.

FIG. 4 illustrates bounded rollback and correction, including receipt freezing, revocation references, and cache invalidation.

FIG. 5 illustrates optional time-value minting and index publication based on RR events.

FIG. 6 illustrates optional knowledge graph injection, GI identity verification, and GOK object-key binding.

DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY

The following terms are used for clarity; definitions are non-limiting.

• • Identifier (or Identifier String)—A resolvable string in one or more namespaces. An identifier may be a domain name, subdomain, URI, or other resolvable label.
  • Domain Name (as used herein)—Not limited to conventional DNS usage; may refer to any resolvable identifier that operates as a namespace entry and/or Basepoint node in the protocol.
  • Basepoint—A root node selected from the identifier reservoir that anchors policy execution, scope derivation, and receipt formation for a resolution event.
  • Parcel/Lot/Sub-Identifier—A scoped sub-identifier derived from a Basepoint (e.g., a subdomain) representing a subdivided namespace instance that can be bound to an entity, asset, user, or policy scope.
  • Policy Container—A versioned, machine-executable policy bundle (rules, coefficients, compliance toggles, reason codes) loaded by the resolver for a given Basepoint and scope.
  • Scope Token—A cryptographically verifiable token encoding scope, authorization, and compliance parameters that enables policy-governed resolution and selective disclosure.
  • Selective Disclosure—A policy-controlled disclosure mode that returns minimized or jurisdiction-appropriate subsets of RR fields while maintaining independent verifiability of the receipt.
  • Knowledge Graph (KG)—A semantic entity/relationship service used to enrich resolution context (e.g., Google Knowledge Graph or an equivalent KG service).
  • GI-DID (Global Identity Root)—A decentralized-identity anchor (e.g., W3C DID) binding a subject to resolution events and RR evidence.
  • GOK (Global Object Key)—A content-addressable object identifier derived from one or more of: KG entity IDs, Basepoint IDs, timestamps, and/or object hashes; used to bind physical/digital assets to RR evidence.
  • Resolution Receipt (RR)—A canonical, cryptographically signed, independently verifiable record emitted by the resolver, comprising policy metadata, reason codes, audit anchors, and metering/identity/object fields.

Term	Meaning (non-limiting)
Basepoint	A primary identifier node (e.g., a domain name)
	that acts as a governance and resolution
	anchor; may spawn parcels/subdomains.
Parcel	A subdivided identifier namespace under a
	basepoint (e.g., a subdomain) representing
	a delegated space.
Policy Container	A versioned, auditable policy package
	bound to a TLD/basepoint/parcel that governs
	resolution decisions and disclosure rules.
Scope Token	A cryptographically verifiable token encoding
	range-based delegation: audience, time window,
	allowed fields, purpose, and policy-version
	constraints.
Resolution Receipt (RR)	A structured, signed evidence object produced
	by the resolver describing the decision, policy
	version, reason code, proofs, and optional
	anchors.
ER/DR/SR	Exemplary resolution outputs: Evidence
	Response (ER), Direct Response (DR),
	Structured Response (SR), optionally combined
	with RR.
GI (Global Identity)	A global identity root or DID-compatible
	identifier bound to a subject and used in
	authorization and receipts.
GOK (Global Object Key)	A globally unique key for a resource/event/
	object (e.g., content-addressed identifier) bound
	to receipts for provenance and audit.
Bounded Rollback	A constrained correction mechanism limited by
	time (e.g., <=72 hours) and depth (e.g., <=3
	layers), producing correction recipts.

System Overview and Architecture

FIG. 1 depicts a system in which a resolver or gateway (e.g., hosted at ATMS.COM in one embodiment) processes a DNS-like query and produces both a resolution output and a standardized RR. The system may be implemented as an authoritative resolver, recursive resolver, enterprise DNS gateway, or application-level resolution service compatible with DNS/DoH/DOT transports.

Core Components

Component	Function	Notes/Examples
Genesis/Basepoint	Validates and	Appendix A inventory;
Registry	resolves	DNS zone files; registry
	basepoints/parcels;	DB.
	may consult a pre-
	established
	identifier
	reservoir.
Policy Engine +	Loads a versioned	TLD policy containers;
Policy	policy container	industry templates.
Containers	and evaluates
	decision logic.
Scope Delegation	Validates Scope	Selective disclosure rules.
Service	Tokens; enforces
	minimum
	disclosure.
Lifecycle	Freeze/revoke/	<=72 h, <=3 layers;
Governance	transfer/hold,	revocation lists.
Service	bounded rollback,
	recovery
	workflows.
Receipt Forge (RR	Generates RR	Protobuf/CBOR/JSON.
Generator)	including reason
	codes, policy
	versions, signature
	chain, anchors.
Audit Anchor Bus	Anchors hashes to	Public chain, consortium
	one or more	chain, transparency log.
	ledgers/logs;
	supports third-
	party verification.
Knowledge Graph	Resolves	External KG API; internal
Fusion Layer	domain/basepoint	KG.
	to entity IDs and
	relations.
GI Identity Root	Verifies subject	DID-compatible; eID;
	identity roots;	sign-in systems.
	issues/validates
	identity assertions.
GOK Object-Key	Generates object	CID-like identifiers; cloud
Generator	keys for resources/	object keys.
	events; binds to
	RR.
Time-Value Engine	Computes	Index-driven valuation
	duration/value;	(e.g., beiindex.com).
	optionally mints or
	accounts time-
	value units.
Index Publisher	Aggregates RR	Minute-level aggregates;
	events into	API feed.
	metrics/indices
	(e.g., minute-
	GDP).

Pre-Established Identifier Reservoir (1999 Inventory)

In some embodiments, the disclosed protocol uses a pre-established BEI identifier “Reservoir,” initiated circa 1999 by Furong BEI, as a scalable naming substrate for global, long-horizon identity and governance. The Reservoir allocates basepoints and hierarchical namespaces to persons, families, organizations, industries, and jurisdictions, functioning as a durable, expandable “Treasure Bowl/Virgin Land” digital parcel that can be indefinitely subdivided via derived identifiers (e.g., subdomains).

This application is a continuation-in-part of the applications listed in the Application Data Sheet (ADS) filed herewith, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

Data Structures

Resolution Receipt (RR)—Example Schema

The RR is a structured evidence object. Table 1 describes exemplary fields; implementations may include additional fields.

Field	Type (example)	Purpose	Notes
rr_version	string	Receipt	May include
		format/version	semantic version +
		identifier	hash suffix.
policy_	string	Policy container	May embed
version		version applied	container hash.
reason_code	uint16	Machine-readable	Industry ranges
		decision reason	reserved;
			extensible.
timestamp_	uint64	Decision time	Unix seconds or
utc			ms.
query_name	string	Resolved name	Domain/basepoint/
			parcel.
resolution_	bytes/struct	ER/DR/SR payload	DNS RRset or
output			structured object.
sig_chain	repeated Sig	Multi-signer proof	Resolver, policy
		chain	authority, operator.
audit_anchor	string/bytes	Anchor reference	Ledger tx hash;
			transparency log id.
bei_duration	uint32	Time duration	From verified event
		(minutes)	telemetry.
bei_value	decimal	Time-value units	May use index rate
			feed.
kg_entity_id	string	Knowledge graph	e.g., external KG
		entity id	id.
kg_	float	Entity confidence	Threshold gating
confidence		score	possible.
gi_did_root	string	Identity root	DID-compatible
		hash/DID	root.
gok_hash	string	Object key for	Content address or
		resource/event	object key.
status	enum	ACTIVE/FROZEN/	Used for
		ROLLBACK/etc.	governance and
			correction.
revocation_	string	Pointer to	Optional; supports
ref		revocation/rollback	cache invalidation.
		record

Exemplary deterministic data structures for the Resolution Receipt (RR or RRec), including signature-chain representation, are provided in Appendix B. Exemplary Scope Token (ST) templates, denial reason-code semantics, and remediation-step fields are provided in Appendix C. Canonicalization, hashing, signature verification, and rollback-impact reporting are described in the Detailed Description (e.g., receipt canonicalization and signature verification).

Scope Token—Example Structure

A Scope Token encodes range-based delegation, minimum disclosure, and policy-version constraints.

Program Listing Reference (Non-limiting): Illustrative program listings, encoding examples, and test vectors are provided in a separate Code Appendix/Computer Program Listing attachment. For written-description and enablement, the present specification defines (i) the Resolution Receipt (RRec) field set (e.g., result_set, reason_code, policy_hash, policy_version, audit_anchor, signature_chain, revocation_ref, rollback_ref, ttl, bei_duration, bei_value, gi_did_root, gok_hash, kg_entity_id, demand_code, industry_code, regulation_id, resource_type, exchange_coin, savings_rate, status), (ii) deterministic hashing and signing inputs, and (iii) independent verification and bounded rollback procedures.

Operational Flows

Resolution-as-Evidence Flow

A non-limiting flow includes: (1) receive query; (2) map query to basepoint/parcel; (3) load policy container; (4) validate Scope Token; (5) compute decision and output ER/DR/SR; (6) generate RR with reason code, policy version, signature chain, and audit anchors; (7) return response to the requester; (8) optionally anchor RR hash and publish index metrics.

Bounded Rollback and Correction

Upon a correction trigger (e.g., mis-binding, key compromise, policy error), a governance service may: (i) verify evidence; (ii) produce a rollback record within bounded constraints (e.g., <=72 hours, <=3 layers); (iii) freeze or revoke affected receipts and object keys; (iv) emit a correction RR referencing the prior RR; (v) invalidate caches based on revocation references; and (vi) preserve auditability via immutable anchors.

Security, Privacy, and Compliance Considerations

Encrypted transports such as DoH and DoT may be used for confidentiality in transit. Minimum disclosure is enforced by Scope Token field allowlists. Receipts may be designed for third-party verification by including a complete signature chain and stable hash canonicalization.

In some embodiments, sensitive data is not embedded directly in the RR; instead, the RR includes references (e.g., object keys) to encrypted payloads, with access controlled by policy and delegation.

Cryptographic Verification Test Vector (Non-Limiting, Deterministic Example)

To support independent verification and reproducibility, some embodiments define a canonical request payload and deterministic hashing procedure. The following test vector is non-limiting and is provided to enable third parties to reproduce identical bytes, hashes, and signature verification results.

Canonical JSON (UTF-8; keys sorted; no whitespace):
{“identifier”:“alice.medicalcenter.us”,“nonce”:“000102030405060708090A0B0C0D0E0
F”,“policy_version”:“1.0.0”,“scope”:{“identity_scope”:“subject”,“scene_scope”:“medical
_access”,“target_scope”:“record_read”},“time_window”:{“end_at”:“2026-01-
14T06:05:22Z”,“start_at”:“2026-01-14T05:05:22Z”}}
SHA-256 digest (hex) of canonical JSON:
d7bcb673a6a58bf778c9079d73b211b34e3219cecba96a4237f9d93b08205963
Ed25519 public key (base64, 32 bytes):
cSZR9FC6BbY4mLme9fe6RWMujiUn9/cVzWcexAJMxR4=
Ed25519 signature over canonical JSON (base64, 64 bytes):
0fJQhoQnezzu3J95MisGWuiw7dkUEhlnAgVgMG/dtpM2hQfZGFGzXtHDi9Q9nbqdew
bWZG0IdgnEwIG/m3VNDw==

Verification rule: verify (signature, canonical json, public_key) MUST return TRUE to accept the receipt chain; otherwise the client MUST treat the response as invalid and may emit a DR with RC-08 (INTEGRITY_FAIL).

Exemplary Embodiments

Medical Service (17-Minute Example)

A patient ‘Zhang San’ completes a medical consultation lasting 17 minutes. A client application submits a query for diabetes.zhangsan.beihealth.com. The resolver maps the basepoint to a medical policy container and validates a Scope Token issued to a clinician.

The policy authorizes minimum disclosure. The system optionally queries a knowledge graph to bind the request to a diabetes-related entity ID. The time-value engine records bei_duration=17 and computes bei_value using an index feed. An RR is generated and anchored. The RR serves as a verifiable evidence receipt for settlement, compliance, and audit.

Supply Chain Mis-Binding and Rollback

A supply-chain parcel is mis-bound to an incorrect operator. Evidence is submitted within 72 hours. The governance service performs bounded rollback, invalidates affected object keys, emits a correction RR (status=ROLLBACK or RECOVERED), and forces cache invalidation via revocation references.

Sovereignty Gateway and Regulatory Audit

A national or industry gateway operates policy containers at a TLD scope. Each resolution produces an RR that encodes policy version and reason codes. Auditors verify compliance by validating RR signature chains and anchors, without trusting the resolver operator.

Exemplary Central-Bank Portal and Rule Publication (Worldcentralbank.Us: Worldbankcentral.Com)

In one non-limiting embodiment, an operator publishes an authoritative portal for time-denominated settlement and policy discovery at a resolvable basepoint (e.g., worldcentralbank.us and/or worldbankcentral.com). The portal can expose (i) a signed, versioned policy-container manifest, (ii) a resolver endpoint for generating enhanced resolution receipts (RRs), and (iii) a public dashboard reflecting a minute-index snapshot (e.g., via beiindex.com and/or minuteindex.org).

In such embodiment, a client submits a resolution request that includes an asserted activity duration and a scoped identifier (e.g., a sub-identifier derived from a curated basepoint). The resolver returns an enhanced RR that is tamper-evident (e.g., by cryptographic signature and/or by anchoring a digest to an audit chain) and that includes, without limitation, (a) duration, (b) computed value, (c) an identity-root reference, and (d) a minute-index reference to a contemporaneous snapshot identifier.

Exemplary Time-Asset Dashboard and Wallet (Timeassets.Org; Timeassets.App)

In one non-limiting embodiment, a time-asset management interface is provided via a web endpoint and/or mobile endpoint (e.g., timeassets.org and timeassets.app). The interface can display balances of time-denominated units, pending receipts, lock states, and verification status, and can provide workflows to verify an RR by validating a signature and/or audit anchor digest.

In certain embodiments, the time-asset interface bridges settlement to one or more minting and exchange components (e.g., a minting basepoint such as beimint.com and an exchange/index basepoint such as beicx.com/bigx.com), while maintaining an immutable or append-only receipt history for auditability.

Exemplary Time Savings Account and Compounding (Savingsbank.App: Minutebank.Org)

In one non-limiting embodiment, a ‘time savings account’ (TSA) is implemented by a client application (e.g., savingsbank.app) interoperating with a retail banking gateway (e.g., minutebank.org). The TSA can support lock-up periods, withdrawal rules, and rate parameters derived at least in part from a minute-index reference. The lock state can be recorded in the RR (e.g., a status field such as SAVINGS_LOCKED) such that downstream verifiers can independently confirm that units are subject to restrictions and policy controls.

In certain embodiments, the TSA supports inheritance and escrow-like controls (e.g., time-locked releases, designated beneficiaries, or dead-man switch triggers), with corresponding conditions recorded as receipt metadata and validated by a resolver policy container.

Exemplary Global Minute Index and Time-Denominated GDP Snapshot (minuteindex.org)

In one non-limiting embodiment, a minute-index service (e.g., minuteindex.org) publishes periodic snapshots that quantify aggregates of time-denominated activity metrics. A snapshot identifier can be referenced within each RR to provide a consistent valuation context and to enable independent recomputation or audit of derived values.

In certain embodiments, the minute-index service exposes an API for retrieving signed snapshot data and historical time-series, enabling derivative analytics such as sector-weighted indices, regional indices, or policy-trigger thresholds.

Exemplary Global Identity Ingress Via GI Application (Beigi.App)

In one non-limiting embodiment, a client identity ingress application (e.g., beigi.app) is used to register or bind a subject to an identity root (e.g., a DID-compatible identifier) and to provision keys for receipt signing/verification.

In certain embodiments, the identity ingress supports multiple identity providers (e.g., W3C DID methods, federated sign-in, and/or national eID), while normalizing outputs to a common resolver interface and enabling privacy-preserving verification through scoped credentials.

Real-Estate Time Coordinate, IoT Anchor, and Title-as-Receipt Embodiment

In one embodiment, a physical real-estate unit (e.g., an apartment, building, land parcel, or infrastructure asset) is represented as a time-coordinate identifier that is resolvable via the basepoint namespace. The identifier operates as a persistent address, a policy scope, and a settlement endpoint.

Example identifier (non-limiting): apt-001.chaoyang.beilots.com (or an equivalent sub-identifier under a designated housing or banking basepoint). The basepoint policy container stores, for the real-estate unit, parameters such as a remaining-duration limit (e.g., 70-year or 999-year tenure), a minimum collateral floor expressed in time units, and an associated global object key (GOK) that binds the identifier to a canonical property content-address (e.g., CID) and/or title registry record.

IoT anchoring: the real-estate unit may include one or more attested sensors (e.g., energy meter, water meter, door lock, temperature/humidity, air quality). At each reporting interval (e.g., per minute, per hour, or event-driven), an attested measurement bundle is produced, hashed, and anchored into the audit ledger. The measurement bundle may be used to (i) compute maintenance or resource time units attributable to the asset, (ii) validate habitability and compliance, and/or (iii) update risk, insurance, or sustainability metrics referenced by the policy container.

Title-as-Receipt: for title transfer, lease, mortgage, or lien operations, the system generates a Resolution Receipt (RREC) that includes (a) the property identifier, (b) the current policy version, (c) the GOK hash binding, (d) an IoT data anchor hash (if applicable), (e) a state field (e.g., OWNED, LEASED, MORTGAGED, RELEASED), and (f) a cryptographic signature and/or DNSSEC chain-of-trust evidence. The RREC thereby operates as a machine-verifiable digital deed that can be presented, validated, and audited without reliance on paper records.

Non-limiting example flow: a purchaser acquires a unit; the system binds the unit to a sub-identifier and initializes a policy container with tenure and collateral rules. After IoT onboarding, periodic IoT anchors update the asset's condition metrics. If the owner elects to borrow against time-value, a time-collateral portion is locked (e.g., within savingsbank.app) and the RREC state transitions to MORTGAGED; upon settlement, the lock is released and the state transitions back to OWNED.

This embodiment provides a technical improvement over conventional title systems by enabling (i) verifiable, cryptographically signed, machine-readable title receipts; (ii) automated state transitions and settlement controls; and (iii) optional IoT-backed condition anchoring that reduces fraud and improves auditability.

Technical Effects and Advantages

Compared to conventional DNS resolution, the disclosed system can provide:

• • Standardized, portable evidence of resolution decisions (RR) with reason codes, policy versions, signatures, and anchors.
  • Range-based delegation and minimum disclosure enforced at resolution time via Scope Tokens.
  • Lifecycle governance with bounded rollback and auditable correction receipts.
  • Optional integration of knowledge-graph semantics, global identity roots, and object-key provenance.
  • Optional time-value accounting/minting tied to verified events, enabling minute-scale indices and settlement systems.

Patentability-Oriented Technical Review (Non-Legal)

This section provides a technical framing commonly used to support patentability. It is not legal advice.

Subject Matter Eligibility (35 U.S.C. Section 101)—Technical Improvement

The disclosure describes protocol-level and system-level improvements: new structured outputs (RR), policy-container versioning, scope-based delegation with minimum disclosure, cryptographic verification and audit anchoring, and bounded rollback mechanisms. These features can be implemented as concrete data structures and network-processing steps that improve the security, accountability, and governance of name resolution.

Enablement and Written Description (35 U.S.C. Section 112)—Support Strategy

Enablement is supported by: (i) explicit field definitions and schemas for RR and Scope Tokens; (ii) described modules and interactions; (iii) exemplary embodiments; and (iv) appendices containing identifier inventory and implementation artifacts. The specification emphasizes deterministic verification steps and bounded correction conditions to avoid ambiguity.

Novelty and Non-Obviousness (35 U.S.C. Section Section 102-103)—Differentiators

Prior approaches may include blockchain-based naming, DNS security extensions, identity systems, time-token protocols, and knowledge graphs. The differentiator is the integrated resolution-time closed loop that produces a standardized evidence receipt with policy versioning and reason codes, enforces scope-based minimum disclosure, supports bounded rollback, and optionally binds to knowledge entities, identity roots, and object keys.

Commercialization, Licensing, and Asset Packaging (Non-Financial)

This section presents non-binding commercialization frameworks; actual valuation depends on adoption, enforceability, competition, and regulatory conditions.

Typical Licensing Targets

		Potential Claim	Licensing Form
Target	Likely Use	Touchpoints	(examples)
DNS Resolver	Evidence-	Claims on RR	Per-QPS/per-
Operators/Public	producing policy-	generation, policy	domain annual
DNS	enforced resolution;	versioning,	license; SDK
	RR output	signature chain	license
Cloud DNS/	Compliance and	Claims on Scope	SaaS subscription;
Enterprise	audit, minimum	Tokens, rollback,	per-instance license
Gateways	disclosure,	cache invalidation
	revocation
Industry Platforms	Industry policy	Claims on industry	Vertical package
(health, supply	templates and	policy containers	license; revenue
chain)	governance	and field allowlists	share
Government/	TLD-level policy	Claims on TLD	High-value
Sovereignty	enforcement and	policy containers,	operational license;
Gateways	audit	audit anchors,	managed services
		correction receipts
Index/Exchange	Minute-scale	Claims on time-	Index licensing;
Operators	indices based on	value engine and	data feed licensing
	RR events	index publication

Asset Package Composition

An asset package may include: (i) patent family (US/CN/EP/PCT); (ii) RR and Scope Token schema standards; (iii) SDKs and reference implementations; (iv) pre-established identifier reservoir evidence (Appendix A); and (v) brand and operational domains used as deployment nodes.

Claim 1 Element	Specification Support	FIGS.
receive resolution request;	Sections 9, 11.1	FIG. 1
map to basepoint/parcel
pre-established identifier	Section 9.2; Appendix A	FIG. 1
reservoir
load versioned policy	Sections 9.1, 11.1	FIG. 2
container
validate Scope Token;	Sections 10.2, 11.1, 12	FIG. 3
minimum disclosure
generate RR with	Sections 10.1, 11.1	FIG. 1
reason/policy/sig/anchor
bounded rollback;	Section 11.2	FIG. 4
correction receipts
optional time-value; index	Sections 10.1, 11.1, 16	FIG. 5
publication
optional KG/GI/GOK	Sections 9.1, 10.1, 13	FIG. 6
bindings

Appendix A Reference and Inventory Integration

Appendix A (incorporated by reference) provides a non-limiting curated inventory of basepoint identifiers that may be used as resolvable namespace entries for the disclosed system. The inventory may be treated as a reusable and extensible resource reservoir (“Treasure-Bowl”) that can be expanded without departing from the scope of the claims.

For prosecution and enablement, Appendix A may be submitted as a separate attachment and referenced herein as disclosure support for exemplary basepoint naming, categorization, and namespace partitioning strategies.

Appendix B: Resolution Receipt Schema (Illustrative)

The RR schema referenced herein is provided in a separately filed Code Appendix as a non-limiting example. Alternative encodings (e.g., JSON, CBOR, ASN.1) and additional or fewer fields may be used without departing from the scope of the claims.

Appendix B is filed separately as a Code Appendix containing non-limiting exemplary serialization schemas and test vectors (e.g., a deterministic RR schema). The operative RR field set and semantics are defined in this Specification.

Appendix C: Scope Token Templates, Denial Reason Codes, and 2026 Activation Nodes

A Scope Token (ST) is a signed authorization object comprising, by way of example, an audience identifier, expiry, purpose/intent, one or more scopes (identity_scope, scene_scope, target_scope), a time_window (or a Time-Domain Coordinate (TDC) path), a privacy_level, a whitelist of fields permitted for disclosure, a policy_pack identifier and version, a nonce, and a cryptographic signature.

A Denial Receipt (DR) comprises at least a machine-readable reason_code and one or more remediation_steps that enable a client to correct inputs and retry, optionally under a retry_policy, while preserving selective disclosure.

Receipt verification may be performed by recomputing deterministic hashes (e.g., policy_hash and audit_anchor), verifying a signature_chain, and confirming that the referenced policy_pack version and time_window constraints are satisfied; an illustrative test vector is provided in the separately filed Code Appendix.

Non-limiting examples of activation nodes and portals registered and/or controlled by the Applicant include:

• • worldcentralbank.us—public portal for World Minute Central Bank routing and policy publication
  • worldbankcentral.com—governance and standards portal for time-based monetary policy containers
  • timeassets.org—time-asset dashboard and standards documentation portal
  • timeassets.app—client application endpoint for time-asset management and wallet functions
  • beigi app-global ID (GI) client entrypoint for identity registration and wallet binding
  • minutebank.org—public-facing retail-minute banking portal and routing entrypoint (non-limiting example)
  • minuteindex.org—publication endpoint for minute-grade economic aggregation (Global Minute GDP/index snapshots)
  • beiindex.com—computation endpoint for minute-index coefficients and aggregate streaming inputs
  • savingsbank.app—client application endpoint for time savings accounts, lockup, compounding, and trust/inheritance controls
  • beimint.com—minting contract namespace and reference endpoint for time-minting transactions
  • genesistimecoin.com—minting brand/entrypoint for time coin issuance (non-limiting example)
  • beitimeminting.com—distributed minting node namespace for modern execution and scaling (non-limiting example)

Appendix G: Centennial Impact Assessment (Non-Limiting)

This appendix is provided as a non-limiting, illustrative impact assessment intended for contextual disclosure. It summarizes possible civilizational, economic, and governance effects enabled by the disclosed technical mechanisms (policy-governed resolution, cryptographically verifiable RR evidence, minute-grade metering, identity/object anchoring, and real-time index aggregation). This appendix is not required for enablement and shall not be construed as limiting any claim.

• • Over a multi-decade horizon, time-denominated accounting can standardize cross-context settlement by referencing a common time unit and an index publication mechanism.
  • Resolution receipts and audit anchoring may reduce fraud and improve transparency in multi-party transactions by enabling machine-verifiable evidence of activity, policy, and settlement state.
  • Where implemented with privacy modes and bounded rollback procedures, the system can support controlled disclosure while retaining auditability under policy-defined conditions.
  • Infrastructure embodiments, including real-estate and IoT anchoring, can convert physical resource usage and condition measurements into verifiable, auditable settlement records.
  • Minute-grade indices may enable near-real-time macroeconomic instrumentation for governments and enterprises, reducing reliance on delayed batch GDP reporting.
  • Time-denominated settlement may support new benefit and subsidy models (e.g., education or healthcare time credits) while preserving auditability and privacy via selective disclosure.
  • A time savings account embodiment may support lockup, compounding, and inheritance controls, with receipt states (e.g., SAVINGS_LOCKED, TRUST, INHERITED) enforced by policy containers.
  • Real-estate and infrastructure embodiments may bind parcels to GOKs and IoT minute feeds, enabling verifiable lease/mortgage workflows via RR state transitions (e.g., OWNED->MORTGAGE->OWNED).
  • Cross-jurisdiction policy containers may allow machine-executable compliance (e.g., GDPR, PIPL, MiCA) to be evidenced by RR reason codes and regulation anchors.
  • Standardization of RR schemas may enable interoperable validation across institutions and chains, enabling licensing of a common verification layer without dependence on a single resolver.

Input Field	Meaning
domain	Identifier string, e.g.,
	alice.medicalcenter.us or
	device123.beinode.com
intent	Action intent: access/pay/authorize/
	read/call API/transfer/revoke/etc.
scopes	identity_scope, scene_scope,
	target_scope
	(scope-based delegation)
time_window	start_at/end_at, or a Time-Domain
	Coordinate (TDC) path
privacy_level	PUBLIC/MINIMAL_DISCLOSURE/
	ZK_PROOF (or equivalent)
auth_proof	Passkey/WebAuthn signature and/or
	VC/ZK evidence, as required by policy

		Core Fields (Non-
Receipt	When Emitted	Limiting)
ER (Evidence Receipt)	Allowed resolution/	policy_version,
	successful binding	reason_code, scope,
		time_window,
		payload_hash,
		signature_chain,
		audit_anchor
DR (Denial Receipt)	Denied resolution (missing	reason_code,
	auth/policy fail)	remediation_steps[ ],
		retry_policy,
		policy_version,
		audit_anchor
SR (Settlement Receipt)	Settlement/minting/locking	bei_duration,
	occurs	metering_coeff,
		exchange_rate,
		settlement_ref,
		audit_anchor
RR (Rollback Receipt)	Bounded rollback/	rollback_ref,
	correction/reversal	impact_report_hash,
		rollback_window,
		policy_version,
		audit_anchor

Field	Example value
rollback_ref	BRL:2026-01-
	10T12:00Z:sha256:9c2b...(truncated)
trigger	Theft/dispute claim on controller proof for
	device123.beinode.com
affected_time_range	2026-01-10T12:00Z to 2026-02-
	09T12:00Z
impact_set_hashes	sha256(device123.beinode.com)-b0e3fob
	0b334b6d3;
	sha256(.../api)=b85f1e6e1b1e4d7a;
	sha256(.../keys/1)=fd2ddbb30ec51b0c;
	sha256(tenantA....)=d7e9dfcc0a1ce39d;
	sha256(logs....)=fa083c791bbcd93b
terminal_rules	Block intents {SETTLE, TRANSFER,
	ROTATE_KEY} for impact_set during
	affected_time_range; allow
	READ_MINIMAL only.
signatures	signature_chain verifies under
	policy_version=1.2.0 (illustrative).

		Remediation Steps
Reason Code	Meaning	(Example)
DR-001	Missing authentication	Provide
	proof	WebAuthn/Passkey
		signature bound to GI-
		DID; retry
DR-002	Scope token	Request renewed Scope
	invalid/expired	Token with correct
		audience and time_window
DR-003	Policy PackSet mismatch	Select correct
		jurisdiction/industry
		PackSet; retry with
		packset_version
DR-004	Selective disclosure	Provide VC or ZK proof
	required	for requested field set;
		retry
DR-005	Controller proof revoked	Rotate controller key;
		publish revocation state;
		retry
DR-006	Confidence below	Provide higher-confidence
	threshold	KG evidence or manual
		attestation; retry
DR-007	Resource telemetry	Reconcile IoT hash feed;
	inconsistent	submit calibration receipt;
		retry
DR-008	Rollback window	Proceed with non-rollback
	exceeded	remediation path; generate
		corrective transfer receipt

Identifier
(Example)	Illustrative Role
ATMS.COM	Resolve Gateway/Genesis Resolver
minuteindex.org	Public minute-grade aggregation endpoint
	(index publisher)
beiindex.com	Index computation engine (internal)
minutebank.org	Public portal/access point for minute
	banking services
savingsbank.app	Client wallet/savings lock/trust
	interface
timeassets.org	Standards and metadata publication node
timeassets.app	User-facing asset wallet/dashboard
	distribution node
beigi.app	Global Identity quickstart gateway
beinode.com	IoT and device namespace example
beiedge.com	Edge compute and commerce namespace
	example
Field	Description
receipt_type	ER/DR/SR/RR
receipt_id	Unique identifier (hash of canonical body)
policy_version	Version of policy container used
packset_version	Version of PackSet bundle
	(jurisdiction/industry)
domain	Identifier being resolved
intent	Intent enumerator
time_window	Start/end bounds used in decision
reason_code	Success/denial/rollback reason
	enumerator
signature_chain	One or more signatures (gateway,
	optional controller, optional auditor)
audit_anchor	Digest anchor reference (local/BEI log
	and optional chain)

Item	Value
canonical_message	domain=alice.medicalcenter.us\npolicy_v
	ersion=1.2.0\nnonce=9f1c2e3a4b5c6d7e\n
	start=2026-01-13T00:00:00Z\nend=2026-
	01-13T00:15:00Z\n
sha256(canonical_message)	a2351c37b7edd874003fa2928735ad10862
	5b06ff73cfea201ae0bd69db41d76
ed25519_public_key (hex)	03a107bff3ce10be1d70dd18e74bc09967e
	4d6309ba50d5f1ddc8664125531b8
ed25519_signature (hex)	b088e9650a92e6c48b40d0c7ad9dea45ddc
	629ff35b0e4b083558dd92a918b04f72fc1
	77aab9155ac5d001dd52911ed701fda444a
	d1c25d0d653bd713867ea0b
verification_expected	TRUE
note	Keys shown are for test purposes only;
	production keys SHALL be generated
	securely.

Scope Token Field	Meaning
aud	Intended audience (gateway or service)
sub	Subject GI-DID
scopes	identity_scope/scene_scope/target_scope
time_window	Start/end bounds
nonce	Anti-replay
field_whitelist	Fields allowed to disclose
regulation_id	Regulatory profile hash
sig	Signature of issuer
KPI	Definition (Non-Limiting)
kpi_dispute_rate	count(RR where reason_code indicates
	refund)/count(SR)
kpi_denial_rate	count(DR)/count(total requests)
kpi_privacy_compliance	ratio of MINIMAL_DISCLOSURE/ZK to
	total sensitive intents
kpi_iot_integrity	ratio of accepted telemetry vs DR-007
kpi_rollback_latency	median time from rollback request to RR
	issuance
Threat	Mitigation (Non-Limiting)
Replay attack on auth_proof	Nonce + time_window binding; DR-002
	on replay; passkey sign-in binding
Downgrade attack on	Policy forces minimum privacy; DR-
privacy_level	003/DR-004 on violations
Key compromise of	Revocation/rotation state; ER references
controller	controller_proof_hash
Gateway compromise	Signature_chain includes auditor co-
	signature; external verification; multi-log
	anchoring
Telemetry spoofing	IoT signed measurements; calibration
	receipts; DR-007 on inconsistencies
Denial of service	Rate limits; cached PackSets; circuit
	breaker emits DR with retry_policy
Information leakage	Selective disclosure; ZK proofs; store
	hashes only on public anchors

Existing Technology	What It Provides	What GKOT-SP Adds
		(Non-Limiting)
DNS	Name resolution/records	No policy receipts, no
		denial semantics, no
		rollback, no metering
DNSSEC	Integrity of DNS records	Does not emit
		ER/DR/SR/RR or reason
		codes
DoH/DOT	Encrypted transport for	Transport security only; no
	DNS queries	governed receipts
DID	Decentralized identifier	Does not define receipt
	document model	ledgers, denial registries,
		rollback constraints
Blockchain receipts	Anchoring of event digests	Absent resolver policy
		execution + scope/time-
		window delegation

Code Range	Category
001-099	Identity, access, enrollment, consent,
	authentication
100-199	Education, training, credentialing,
	assessment
200-299	Mobility, logistics, travel, transit
300-399	Commerce, payments, disputes, escrow
400-499	Healthcare, clinical services, insurance
	claims
500-599	Utilities/resources: water, energy,
	environment, telecom
600-699	Government services, compliance,
	taxation, legal
700-799	Media/IP, communications, content
	licensing
800-899	Real estate, built environment,
	construction, facilities
900-999	Long-horizon/space/reserved for future
	domains

		Typical Intent/Trigger
Demand Code	Label (Illustrative)	(Illustrative)
001	Access/Resolve	Name discovery; fetch
		public endpoints
005	Medical Visit	Clinical encounter;
		eligibility/consent gate
020	Payment/Settlement	Initiate settlement; produce
		Settlement Receipt
033	Authorization Grant	Issue/update Scope Token;
		delegate fields/actions
050	Account Recovery	Key rotation; revocation
		lookup
070	Dispute/Claim	Open dispute; freeze
		lifecycle state
100	Learning/Study	Education minutes; accrual
		and/or credential request
120	Examination/Certification	Verification; QUALIFIED
		status
200	Bandwidth/Compute	Meter
		network/storage/compute
		minutes
210	Mobility/Transit	Trip settlement;
		TRIP_COMPLETED
		status
300	Real-Estate Lease	Lease lifecycle; LEASED
		status
310	Mortgage/Collateral	Collateral lock;
		MORTGAGE status
900	Administrative/System	Policy update; registry
		maintenance
001-999	Reserved range	Additional codes may be
		defined. Codes may be
		grouped by ranges (e.g.,
		001-099 access/identity;
		100-199 education; 200-
		299 compute/mobility;
		300-399 real-estate).

	Code Range	Industry Family
	001-040	Healthcare & Life Sciences
	041-080	Education & Research
	081-120	Finance, Banking, Insurance
	121-160	Retail, Commerce, Marketplaces
	161-200	Transportation, Logistics, Mobility
	201-240	Utilities, Energy, Water, Environment
	241-280	Manufacturing, Industrial, Supply Chain
	281-320	Government, Legal, Public Safety
	321-350	Media, Telecom, Internet Services
	351-365	Real Estate & Built Environment

		Typical Context
Industry Code	Industry (Illustrative)	(Illustrative)
001	General/Cross-Industry	Default when no
		specialization applies
007	Healthcare/Oncology	Clinical services and
		oncology workflows
010	Healthcare/General	General medical services
050	Education/K-12	Primary and secondary
		education
060	Education/Higher Ed	Universities and vocational
		programs
100	Finance/Banking	Retail and commercial
		banking
110	Insurance	Health/property/life
		insurance
150	Software/IT Services	Software development and
		managed services
170	Telecom/Network	Carrier and connectivity
		services
200	Energy/Utilities	Electricity generation and
		distribution
210	Water/Waste	Water supply and
		wastewater treatment
250	Real Estate	Property leasing, mortgage,
		titling
300	Government	Public administration,
		compliance, benefits
001-365	Reserved range	Additional codes may be
		defined. Codes may be
		grouped by ranges and/or
		mapped from standard
		industry classifications.

Factor	Example Range	Notes
w_industry(I)	0.5-3.0	Policy-set per industry
		family
w_demand(D)	0.5-5.0	Higher for scarce/high-
		impact demands
w_trust(T)	0.8-1.5	Higher for stronger proofs/
		attestations
w_quality(Q)	0.7-1.3	IoT integrity, audit grade,
		data completeness
w_region(R)	0.5-2.0	Jurisdictional or local
		index adjustments
Tier	Scope	Illustrative Pricing
		Structure
Sovereign	National platforms, central	Annual subscription + per-
	banks, regulators	event metering
		(negotiated)
Industry	Sector consortia (health,	One-time integration
	energy, finance)	license + maintenance
Enterprise	Single enterprise	Per-seat/per-node + receipt
	deployment	volume
Developer	SDK/verifier usage	Per-API call/open-core
		model

Term	Meaning
Basepoint	A root identifier entry used to derive
	scoped sub-identifiers and bind policy.
Resolve Gateway	A governance layer endpoint located via
	DNS discovery that emits receipts.
ER/DR/SR/RR	Evidence, Denial, Settlement, and
	Rollback Receipts.
PackSet	A signed bundle of versioned policy
	modules for a scope/jurisdiction/industry.
Selective	Return of only permitted fields based on
Disclosure	privacy_level and proofs.
Bounded Rollback	Constrained correction mechanism with
	an impact report, avoiding cascade
	effects.
GI-DID	Global identity root (decentralized
	identifier or equivalent).
GOK	Global object key (content-addressable
	object identifier).
TDC	Time Domain Coordinate (time-bounded
	delegation path).
Field	Meaning
rollback_ref	Receipt_id being rolled back
affected_	List of downstream receipt_ids impacted
receipts[ ]
affected_	Identifiers whose state transitions are
identifiers[ ]	affected
affected_indices[ ]	Index snapshots to recompute or annotate
remediation_	Receipts required to restore consistency
receipts[ ]
max_depth	Rollback depth constraint
time_window	Rollback time constraint
Category	Examples (Non-Limiting)
Identity	bei.app, beigi.app, beidid.com, . . .
Minting/	beimint.com, genesistimecoin.com, . . .
Settlement
Index/Analytics	beiindex.com, minuteindex.org,
	beikpi.com, . . .
Banking/Savings	minutebank.org, savingsbank.app,
	timeassets.app, . . .
IoT/Devices	beinode.com, beiedge.com,
	beihost.com, . . .

Status	Meaning	Typical Receipts
ACTIVE	Normal operation; binding	ER, SR
	valid
LEASED	Time-bounded delegated	ER, SR
	occupancy/usage
MORTGAGE	Collateral lock active	SR (lock), ER (state)
SAVINGS_	Minutes locked in	SR, ER
LOCKED	savings/trust
FROZEN	Administrative or fraud	DR, ER
	hold
REVOKED	Controller revoked;	DR, ER
	binding invalid
ETERNAL	Long-horizon inheritance	ER, SR
	mode (policy-governed)

				Emitted
From	To	Trigger	Guard	Receipts
ACTIVE	LEASED	lease_start	valid scope	ER + SR
			token +
			time_window
LEASED	ACTIVE	lease_end	time_window	ER
			expiry
ACTIVE	MORTGAGE	collateral_lock	credit policy	SR + ER
			satisfied
MORTGAGE	ACTIVE	unlock	repayment	SR + ER
			receipt verified
ANY	FROZEN	fraud_alert	policy	DR + ER
			authority
			signature
FROZEN	ACTIVE	release_hold	investigation	ER
			closure
ACTIVE	REVOKED	key_revocation	controller	DR + ER
			revocation
			published

Field	Meaning
duration_limit	e.g., 999 years or statutory lease term
value_floor	minimum collateral minutes
gok_hash	content-addressable object key for parcel
iot_feed_hash	rolling hash commitment of telemetry
energy_minutes	accumulated maintenance minutes
savings_rate	adjusted rate based on efficiency/quality

Consumer-Facing Minute Receipt Portals (Non-Limiting: BEIBILL.COM; BEIRECEIPT.COM)

Some embodiments include consumer-facing portals that expose resolution receipts as familiar “bills,” “receipts,” or “invoices” to enable rapid user comprehension and adoption without requiring protocol knowledge.

Example Portal A (Minute Bill). A portal hosted at an illustrative domain (e.g., BEIBILL.COM) receives a user identifier (email/phone) and a request to mint or retrieve a minute-grade bill. The portal invokes the resolver gateway to generate an RRec that includes bei_duration, bei_value, status, audit_anchor, and signature_chain, and transmits the RRec to the user (e.g., email/SMS) as an electronic bill statement.

Example Portal B (Resolution Receipt). A portal hosted at an illustrative domain (e.g., BEIRECEIPT.COM) issues a verifiable receipt for a resolution event (success or denial). The receipt may be rendered as a human-readable invoice and may include a machine-readable payload (e.g., QR encoding the RRec hash and verification endpoint).

These portals demonstrate that the same protocol layer can serve both machine integrations (API/SDK) and human-facing “receipting” experiences, and they provide evidence artifacts usable for disputes, refunds, chargeback-style remediation, compliance attestations, and user-controlled sharing.

Rollback Impact Report Example (Anti-Domino, Non-Limiting)

Some embodiments emit an Impact Report as part of a bounded rollback receipt (RR) to prevent cascade failures (“anti-domino”). The Impact Report may include a rollback_ref (snapshot pointer), an affected-set list (hashed identifiers), and client response rules.

Example: a disputed medical-access authorization is detected within a bounded rollback window. The governance service freezes the binding and emits RR+Impact Report:

• • rollback_ref: brl://snapshot/0a3211b6cc9257d8
  • Affected identifiers (SHA-256 prefix, 16 hex chars):
  • alice.medicalcenter.us->f8bc8e1f0c2275d9
  • alice.billing.beibill.com->5c7049ee82b2e54a
  • device123.beinode.com->1ef368a1e1f4ace0
  • clinic1.medicalcenter.us->3d1cce4638ae0b04
  • Impact time_window: 2026-01-14T05: 05:22Z to 2026-01-14T06: 05:22Z.

Client rule: upon receiving an Impact Report whose affected-set contains the subject identifier hash prefix, the client MUST block privileged operations, purge caches for the impacted identifiers, and require refreshed authorization proof (e.g., renewed ST) before reconnecting.

Reason-Code Pack and Remediation Hints (Examiner-Friendly Core Set)

In some embodiments, denial is not treated as a silent failure. Instead, the resolver gateway emits a Denial Receipt (DR) that includes a reason_code and remediation_steps, such that clients can programmatically guide recovery. The following non-limiting core set illustrates machine-readable denial semantics:

• • RC-00 OK: Resolution permitted.
  • RC-01 AUTH_DENIED: Authorization proof missing or invalid. Remediation: obtain a valid Scope Token (ST) or WebAuthn/Passkey proof.
  • RC-02 SCOPE_VIOLATION: Requested fields or actions exceed the authorized scope. Remediation: request narrower fields or obtain expanded scope.
  • RC-03 PRIVACY_MIN_DISCLOSURE: Sensitive subject; only challenge endpoint returned. Remediation: provide selective-disclosure VC or ZK proof.
  • RC-04 POLICY_BLOCKED: Policy Container rules prohibit requested intent. Remediation: change intent or satisfy additional prerequisites.
  • RC-05 REVOKED_OR FROZEN: Identifier or controller state revoked/frozen. Remediation: follow recovery/appeal workflow; check revocation_ref.
  • RC-06 STALE_OR_EXPIRED: Time window expired or TTL exceeded. Remediation: refresh request within a new time_window.
  • RC-07 ROLLBACK_IN PROGRESS: Identifier in dispute/rollback workflow. Remediation: wait or submit required dispute evidence; consult rollback ref.
  • RC-08 INTEGRITY_FAIL: Signature chain or audit anchor verification failed. Remediation: re-fetch from authoritative gateway; reject caches.
  • RC-09 RATE LIMITED: Governance throttling applied. Remediation: backoff and retry per retry policy.
  • RC-10 NOT_FOUND: No resolvable binding found under current policy. Remediation: register/claim basepoint or check correct namespace.

Standardization and Interoperability (Non-Limiting)

In non-limiting embodiments, the BEI TRD protocol (also referred to herein as BEIDNS) is designed to be standards-adjacent and interoperable with existing Internet, identity, and security specifications while introducing a new governance layer above discovery resolution. The disclosures below are provided to improve interoperability, repeatability, and third-party verification, and do not limit the scope of the claims.

A. Interoperability with Existing Resolution Standards

Discovery may be performed using conventional name-to-endpoint mechanisms (e.g., DNS resource records including HTTPS/SVCB/URI records and similar service-binding records), and encrypted transport mechanisms (e.g., DoH/DoT) may be used for confidentiality of the query transport. In all such cases, the governance, authorization, selective disclosure, and receipt issuance occur in the resolver gateway layer described in this specification.

B. Interoperability with Identity and Attestation Standards

For identity anchoring, the protocol may interoperate with decentralized identifier document formats and verifiable credential models (e.g., W3C DID and VC models) as non-limiting examples. Strong client authentication may interoperate with WebAuthn/Passkeys for proof-of-control and anti-phishing authentication. These are illustrative integration points; other identity and attestation schemes may be used.

C. Cryptographic Encodings and Receipt Canonicalization

Resolution Receipts (RRec) may be encoded in a deterministic form to enable third-party recomputation and verification. Non-limiting encodings include canonical JSON, CBOR, and/or deterministic protobuf. Signatures may be represented using standard signature containers (e.g., COSE and/or JOSE) with algorithm agility. Audit anchors may be represented as Merkle roots, content-addressable digests (e.g., CID-style digests), or other append-only log commitments.

D. Conformance Profiles and Registries

To support multi-vendor interoperability, implementations may publish conformance profiles for (i) receipt formats, (ii) reason-code vocabularies, (iii) scope-token claim sets, and (iv) policy-container versioning and migration. In non-limiting embodiments, a public or consortium registry may be maintained for reason codes, policy-pack identifiers, and receipt field semantics so that independent verifiers can validate receipts produced by different resolver gateways.

E. Technical Whitepaper/Bluepaper/Technical Review Attachments

A separate non-essential technical attachment entitled “BEI TRD (BEIDNS) Technical Whitepaper, Bluepaper, and Technical Review” may be submitted with this application as an informational appendix. Such attachment may include conformance guidance, deployment profiles, sample test vectors, and additional use-case packs. The present specification is complete without reliance on the technical attachment for compliance with 35 U.S.C. Section 112.